TPMDC Morning Roundup
Panetta: Cheney Almost Wishing For America To Be Attacked
CIA Director Leon Panetta told the New Yorker that former Vice President Dick Cheney may be hoping for America to be attacked by terrorists. "It's almost, a little bit, gallows politics," Panetta said of Cheney's recent speeches. "When you read behind it, it's almost as if he's wishing that this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point. I think that's dangerous politics."
Obama's Day Ahead: Pitching Health Care To AMA
President Obama will be speaking today, at the annual meeting of the American Medical Association, at 12:15 p.m. ET in Chicago. The AMA has come out against a public option, so expect Obama's remarks on health care to rebut potential objections. He will then go back to Washington, where he will meet with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi at 4:15 p.m. ET in the Oval Office.
Biden's Day Ahead
Vice President Biden will be having private meetings today in Wilmington, Delaware. He does not have any scheduled public events.
WaPo: White House Supervising Liberal Groups On Sotomayor
The Washington Post reports that the Obama Administration is coordinating with liberal groups on the Sotomayor confirmation process -- and to a large degree is urging people to remain calm and not be too active. Said progressive legal activist Doug Kendall: "What he wants, and what I think the progressive community has done pretty well, is to stand back a bit and let the president and Judge Sotomayor present their case and explain for themselves."
Former AMA Head Predicts Tough Crowd For Obama
Dr. Donald Palmisano, a former president of the American Medical Association, told The Hill that President Obama will likely get a tough reception at the AMA today. "Our policy is clear: We're opposed to government involvement in medicine," said Palmisano, a registered Republican. He added: "If he says again: 'We want to level the playing field,' everybody's going to say: 'So what does that mean?'"
Obama Open To Limiting Malpractice Suits
The New York Times reports that President Obama is open to the idea of limiting medical malpractice suits, as a means of both lowering costs and winning support among doctors for wider health care reform. Dr. James Rohack, incoming president of the AMA, said he told Obama, "if we as physicians are going to say, 'Here's our guidelines, we will follow them,' then we need to have some protections. He listened and he said, 'Clearly, that concept is worthy of discussion.'"
Dean Pitching Public Option In New Book
CQ reports that Howard Dean is throwing himself into the health care debate with his new book, which staunchly advocates for a public option. Dean also adds a twist of having the government supply medical care to everyone under 30, in lieu of a burdensome individual mandate, and subsidizing it for older adults who can't afford it. "The reason I got involved in politics in the first place was to make sure we have universal health care," said Dean.


















I will say this again. It's not a generalization because the facts support a public option so heavily I think every single politician against a public option is corrupt. If you look in that camera and tell me the reason you are against a public option is because it would work TOO WELL, you are a corrupt stooge and I want nothing to do with you. I can't wait for the Pres to come to NY for a townhall so I can tell him that.
June 15, 2009 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, I think you should revise that a little bit.
If you get to ask the President anything it should be what is he doing to convince Dems in Congress to back the public option. Or when are we going to see more Dems on tv pushing back on the GOP who are clearly lying to the American people.
Or you could give a testimonial about yourself or someone you knew that went bankrupt or was unable to get medical help because you/they could not afford insurance. Follow that with how you and millions of Americans are depending on him and Congress to get the public option passed.
If you make it on the news you want the story to be about the American people who are hurting not angry supporter blasting the president - trust me that's exactly how you will be portrayed in your version.
June 15, 2009 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hate asking a question where I know what the answer will be. "That's why I've told congress we need health reform this year, I do support a public option blah blah blah" I don't want to hear that shit. I want to ear him say he will fight for a public option because it is the RIGHT thing to fight for, it's not something to be compromised away.
June 15, 2009 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
You hate asking a question where you already know the answer? What do you think he is going to say when you demand he fight for public option? - No? Of course he is going to say he'll fight for public option.
I'm just saying that if you get face time with the President I wouldn't waste it going on a rant when you can use it to put a human face on the health care crisis, get some tears going if you want dramatic.
June 15, 2009 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Then I will ask him "You looked in that camera during your weekly address and said "you are ready to fight" so will you FIGHT for this public option, the facts show it would DRASTICALLY lower costs and is much more efficient than private insurance, will you FIGHT for the right plan or compromise it away when a fight is what is needed. Will you allow a bill to go to your desk without a public option? This is a referendum on YOUR leadership, on YOUR presidency on YOUR administration. Will you allow the American people to win, or the insurance industry and their political cronies?." Something dramatic like that.
June 15, 2009 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
If I've learned anything from this President (and from watching the blunders of the last two), it is to always keep in mind that there are usually multiple ways to FIGHT for something. I'd be curious to hear more about what you expect (or rather, would advise) President Obama to do to FIGHT for the public option.
(I should also state here that while I'm no expert, I haven't seen any indication that the inclusion of a public option shouldn't be the Dems line in the sand on this. Nor have I seen any indication that those on the left who are standing in opposition to a public option are doing so out of princple; they seem to be in the pocket of the industry. As for the GOP, they are the Party of No, so I don't do a lot of legwork looking into why they're obstructing THIS piece of Obama's agenda as separate from the next piece or the previous one...)
June 15, 2009 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's Even Worse!: Dick Cheney Hatching New Iran-Contra Plot
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=7456
June 15, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dr. Donald Palmisano says: "If he says again: 'We want to level the playing field,' everybody's going to say: 'So what does that mean?'" I think the president has been pretty clear that this means that some form of a public option needs to be on the table in this debate. What I think the AMA needs to answer is specifically why they are opposed to a public option. I don't know about anyone else, but I don't have sympathy for any organization that simply opposes something because they are worried that it might hurt their profit margins.
June 15, 2009 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
The US is in the bizarre position of having a "debate" about health care financing that pits a center-right (public) plan against the status quo with the addition of some magical thinking about cost savings. In Britain, even the Tories defend the national health care system as central to the idea of equality and democracy, but in the US, out perverted individualism (I guess) prevents us from thinking clearly about health care.
I predict that a plan will pass and that it will have a "public option" so watered down as to be meaningless and ineffective. It will also probably have a mandate, which people will resist furiously once they realize they have been cheated of anything like real reform. The question is, will President Obama have the political courage to send the bill back to Congress with a veto.
June 15, 2009 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
"it's almost as if he's wishing that this country would be attacked again"
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, right Dick?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/
June 15, 2009 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink