« Randall Terry: George Tiller Reaped What He Sowed... Now Let's Go Have Some Hot Wings And Beer | Home | Leahy Meets With Sotomayor Tomorrow »
Pfotenhauer: I Don't Believe Cheney Would Say Things He Knew To Be Inaccurate
Check out this appearance today on MSNBC by former McCain campaign spokesperson Nancy Pfotenhauer, saying how her candidate of course disagreed with Dick Cheney on "harsh interrogation" -- but she doesn't believe Cheney would say things he knew to be inaccurate:
"I don't believe, however, that the former Vice President would be making statements that he knew to be inaccurate," said Pfotenhauer -- spurring open laughter and ridicule from Bill Press and David Shuster.
Advertisement


















I've missed her.
June 1, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Credibility gap, y'think?
June 1, 2009 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
No credibility gap!
Translation: Cheney is delusional.
June 2, 2009 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's got a future in stand-up!
June 1, 2009 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I assume that virtually everything dark Sith Lord CHEE-NEEE would bark up from his cyborg craw to be a lie . . . SOOOO he could start speaking truth and I would find myself totally throw by his improbable candor.
June 1, 2009 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't be so hard on her. She meant to say "accurate".
June 1, 2009 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty careful wording there, "statements that he knew to be inaccurate." It's entirely possible that Cheney avoid statements he knows to be inaccurate by avoiding any information that contradicts what he wants to believe.
It says nothing at all about whether any of it is true, of course...
June 1, 2009 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ms Pfotenhauer, I thought you had left the building. Long time no hear. Taking a peek above the parapet, are you? Testing the waters? Take a little more time off, if you want.
June 1, 2009 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cheney plays a much more sinister role with the truth than is suggested by the terms used abovve.
When he couldn't confirm the fantasised Prague meeting of a supposed Iraqi agent with Al Qaeda and indeed the idea was widely discredited in intelligence circles, what language did he use to report the failure to make any link despite his lengthy, passionate, relentless, bullying efforts?
He called it a "report" that is "pretty much confirmed now." And in his malevolent mind, even if he says it's "pretty much confirmed" 500 times however forcefully, menacingly, belittling the people who found it to be clearly not true, this "pretty much confirmed now" game-playing still gives him room to later snarl, "I said NEVER those reports were confirmed as true! You can go back and check and I hope you do -- I absolutely *NEVER* stated that!" When he speaks to us, this is what he is engaging in, calculated but very forceful disinformation with deniability.
How does absolutely-unconfirmed-and-becoming-more-unlikely-every-time-we-try-to-look- at-it, become "pretty much confirmed now? He just has to have a felon like Scooter Libby keeping after it, and as long as, say, Scooter keeps digging (despite being told repeatedly that it's discredited), the "investigation" is ongoing for Cheney, and while not confirmed it's "pretty much" so, cause when he looks at the lack of any evidence, he still gets a good feeling the link is almost surely there.
In this thoroughly deceitful way, definitely yes, Cheney is meticulous in intentionally, continuously, sharply misleading in a bullying and cocksure manner, without ever "saying something he knows to be inaccurate." The lady's statement is true to that extent.
June 2, 2009 2:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Even is that Prague story were true, it would have been a ridiculously tentative connection, meaning next to nothing. If there was a country with a clear and unambiguous connection to 9/11, it was Saudi Arabia.
June 2, 2009 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to come on her face.
June 3, 2009 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink