Sessions: I'm Very Glad Gingrich Backed Off (Note: Gingrich Didn't Back Off)
The GOP seems to be consolidating around a message of contrition for calling Sonia Sotomayor a racist, recognizing just how politically self-defeating it's been -- even if the retractions aren't exactly genuine.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) spoke to CNN's Dana Bash, who asked him about the alleged walk-back by Newt Gingrich:
"I'm very glad he backed off. I think that's unusual, that commentators do that, and I think it was very good that he did," said Sessions. "I think that will help - help us. I think that will help us have a real good discussion about the serious issues that the nation faces and that the court faces. And there's some disagreements about that."
The thing is, as I've pointed out, Gingrich is very clearly not backing off, if one simply reads his new post beyond the first few paragraphs. Instead, he's talking out of both sides of his mouth by saying he shouldn't have called Sotomayor a racist -- and then haranguing her for making decisions based on race, and repeating this refrain: "You Read, You Decide."


















He "backed off," but he didn't apologize, something that Sessions wants Sotomayor to do for using inflammatory language. Different strokes, and all that....
June 3, 2009 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Correction: Graham demanded the apology. I guess he expects the same of Newt....right?
June 3, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
This:
The Central Question: Is American Justice No Longer Blindfolded?
on the Newster's blog is the talking point of the right. Jeff Jacoby, Cornyn--expect a bunch of handwringing and "concern" that Sotomayor doesn't want Lady Justice Blindfolded!
June 3, 2009 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only in the Republican Fantasy World can someone like Gingrich still have opinions that matter.
June 3, 2009 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Limbaugh just backed down
"I might support Sotomayor"
June 3, 2009 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
This should please the President and Sen Leahy
It is NEVER a good thing to have to deal with the representatives of adversaries who have neither power nor authority nor control of their wacky clients
It is always a nightmare
June 3, 2009 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink