Alpha Dogs: A List Of Some Of The Most Prominent Health Care Slow-Walkers In The House
By now you're probably at least somewhat familiar with the cast of characters in the Senate Democratic caucus--Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman, etc.--who pop up every time a major Obama agenda item is making its way through the legislative process to say, "not so fast!"
But right now, in the House, a group of Blue Dog Democrats is stifling its own party's health care reform proposal, and, for the most part, Americans don't really know who they are. They might know what a "Blue Dog" is, generally speaking--a conservative Democrat from a Republican district, primarily concerned with shrinking the federal deficit (unless the deficit is created by defense and war spending, or tax cuts for the wealthy) and the well-being of big business.
For their pro-corporate positions, and willingness to throw their weight around Congress, the Blue Dogs are richly rewarded. And this year--with energy, financial, and, yes, health industry interests trying desperately to weaken reform legislation--they're on a record pace. But within the Blue Dog caucus there are a range of personalities and animating forces, and it's worth taking a moment to review who the key players are.
Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR): Though not listed as a Blue Dog caucus leader, Ross has, perhaps more than any other Blue Dog, taken the health care reins out of the hands of party leaders. As a member of the Energy and Commerce committee, Ross led six other committee Democrats in a push to stall the legislation, and they've largely succeeded. The fifth-term congressman is a former small business owner, representing the southern half of Arkansas (not including Little Rock). As a Blue Dog, he's insisting that health care costs decrease, but as a representative of a rural district, he's seeking to increase Medicare reimbursement rates to rural doctors--goals that are in fundamental tension with each other. Often, conservative Democrats insist that they're voting their districts which tilt to the right, but though Ross' district does indeed tilt right, the peculiarities of Arkansas politics mean that he often does not face a Republican opponent.
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI): Serving alongside Ross on the Energy and Commerce Committee are six other Blue Dogs--including Reps. Bart Gordon (D-TX), Jim Matheson (D-UT), Charlie Melancon (D-LA), John Barrow (D-GA), Baron Hill (D-IN), and Zack Space (D-OH). Stupak, though, has been an unusually vocal critic of the health care reform process. For him, the key seems to be abortion--specifically, he's seeking to assure that the House health care bill contains a provision ban the use of federal funds for abortion. Stupak recently lost a bid to ban federal funds for abortion in the District of Columbia, and at least part of his intransigence on health care appears to be rooted in frustrations stemming from that defeat.
Rep. Dan Boren (D-OK): Boren is one of the House's most conservative Democrats. He represents the eastern third of Oklahoma, and has since 2005. Last election season he whipped his Republican opponent by a 40 point margin. That might indicate a bit of flexibility--that or that Boren might be able to at least lay low on some issues and vote with his party. But no. Down the line, Boren demonstrates a fealty to big business interests in his state. Concerned with the loss of federal funds (and, perhaps, jobs) in his district, he was a vocal and early opponent of the administration's defense spending overhaul. Along the same lines, he has a weak environmental record. Since being elected, he's received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the oil and gas industry and electric utilities, and, about $200,000 alone from health industry professionals--which may at least partially explain his opposition to swift reform.
Rep. Charlie Melancon (D-LA): Like Boren, Melancon has been a member since early 2005. Unlike Boren, though, Melancon is a member of Blue Dog leadership. And he serves on the House committee--Energy and Commerce--where Blue Dogs are holding health care reform hostage. He was re-elected in 2008 without a Republican opponent and may run for Senate in 2010. He's a one-time small business owner, a Roman Catholic, and bristles at being called a liberal.
Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN): Given his prominent role helping to kill Clinton care in 1994, it's sort of surprising how small a part he's played in these negotiations. You might say he's the Blue Dog that didn't bark. Except that, today, he sort of did. He said that an agreement on health care reform was still "months away," and criticized Obama for giving Congress too much latitude in drafting reform legislation. "I hope that doesn't turn out to be a mistake." The ironies abound--in 1994, conservative Democrats and Republicans lambasted the White House for just the opposite, charging that one of Clinton's chief mistakes was drafting his reform proposal behind closed doors, when it should've been written by legislators.


















What exactly does the American people have to be going through for Congress to decide to work through recess?
As far as I'm concerned, this is the Democratic Congress' Katrina moment. Let's all party and relax while people drown.
July 23, 2009 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pitch perfect.
My mom suffered for 15 years from a disease that saw her lose her job, lose her insurance, lose her savings, and lose her dignity. Finally, last month, she lost her life.
Enjoy your vacations, assholes.
July 23, 2009 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Orlando -- I'm so sorry. Take care.
July 23, 2009 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have been so angry will Congress to use a universal crisis for all American people to fight while others suffered and when I read your comment, well, it was more than I could stand. I broke down and cried. I lost my mother October, last year and I always had the sneaky suspicion the physicians let her die because she was too old to save and would cost a lot of money to let her live. Obviously, Congress do not care about the American people so I have asked God to step in and take control of this health care crisis.
July 24, 2009 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the rundown on the Lap Dogs, Brian.
Tell me again why they're "Democrats"?
July 23, 2009 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
was wondering the same thing, myself.
July 24, 2009 6:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank goodness the Democrats have shown their ability to run Washington efficiently by cutting the voters out of the process completely. All they need is to declare their obesience to the right DC leaders and take the right bribes... and they're IN, baby! No honor or accountability required!
July 23, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Business Week
http://www.businessweek.com/blogs/money_politics/archives/2009/07/study_links_ris.htmlJuly 23, 2009 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good find.
WaPo noted that business is divided. Perhaps because these costs are a burden on them.
Ironically, the GOP claims to be the party of business and capitalism, but health care will bury us. GM cars are 15% more expensive than they should be, meanwhile Toyota doesn't pay health care costs -- Japan has national health care.
Health care is America's competitive disadvantage.
July 23, 2009 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
This really needs to get more play. It should be a no-brainer that, if American business is suffering under the cost of providing health care to workers, then pooling all workers together (the basic idea underlying insurance) would be an excellent solution to the problem. And, since America exists to support business (at least in the eyes of the Washington establishment), there should be a unanimous consensus to reform health care.
Also, isn't it odd how every major study shows that every industrialized country gets the same or better health outcomes than America, yet this factoid NEVER enters the mainstream debate?
July 24, 2009 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
My abortion policy: Anyone not in jeopardy of having to endure labor pains should just STFU.
July 23, 2009 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would be in progressive interest to assist republican challengers in these districts, or getting these guys to go repub. We can afford the lost seats but we can't afford these types heading committees and stalling the agenda.
July 23, 2009 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
They must be so proud of having offered their integrity to the highest bidder.
July 23, 2009 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Boren's constituents are yellow-dog Democrats and bigots of the first order. I'm virtually certain that 99% of them voted for mccain, their yellow dog, rather than vote for a black man. Boren is a coward of the first order.
July 23, 2009 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm 99% certain (not just virtually) that you're a jerk that insults thousands of people you don't know.
July 23, 2009 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
You must be in Boren's district. Right? I'm right next door and know your kind well.
July 26, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
This gang should be proud, I'm sure DeMint will send them all a case of beer since he can now strut with his chest out taking credit for delaying (killing?) health care reform.
Do we need the Blue dogs to pass a good reform bill in the House or can we just run over them and pass a good bill?
July 23, 2009 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
for those of you who support this president and want health care reform with a public option, i strongly urge you to email each of these blue dog democrat coalition members and copy and paste: "Inhofe: Blocking Health Care 'A Huge Gain' For GOP In 2010"
if health care reform fails, americans and america fails and we the voters will hold them accountable. while i do not vote in any of these states, i have told each of them, not only did i work hard to get this president elected but contributed to more than several democratic candidates in states other than my own. they face the ire of the american voters and lose their precious positions.
July 23, 2009 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
We can do without these 5 morons. Let's get them out of the democratic caucus.
July 23, 2009 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew Yglesias had a really astute comment.
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/07/inhofe-killing-health-reform-will-lead-to-a-huge-gain-in-2010.php
What this means is that the Blue Dogs and other 'vulnerable' pols, who fear the 2010 election, would actually be harmed if Obama is seen as failing. It would give tremendous momentum to the GOP in every race.
So ironically, if these Dem cowards hurt Obama sufficiently, they will suffer. (And he will likely still win in 2012, just like Clinton).
It's a little counter intuitive, but it is what actually occured in 1994.
Perhaps someone should tell these Dems that a unified Democratic party is their best insurance.
July 23, 2009 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's doubtful. These guys will survive their elections unless they have some sort of personal meltdown. The Republicans have fielded decent candidates against Ross and Boren both, but such is the power of incumbency in a state small enough for a representative to have paid the freight with almost every constituency of significance. I mean, they don't even run against Ross, and Boren beat his last competitor by forty points. After a while, your name is more important than your party; see also, Robert C. Byrd.
Something has to be done to bridge the gap to these guys. Threatening them is pretty counterproductive, because I suspect most would be primary-proof as well as general-proof. As annoying as it is, their toll will have to be paid.
July 23, 2009 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's not the lesson of 1994. Clinton's defeat mean that the House Dems got pummeled. I'm not sure if these 5 or 6 guys are personally vulnerable, but I bet that most of the other conservative Dems in the House are.
And what they don't get is that a vote against Obama puts them MORE at risk! If a district is very conservative, why not vote out a conservative Dem and pick a GOP anyway?
If Obama is defeated, mark my words, the Congressional Dems are going to pay for it.
July 23, 2009 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton's defeat mean that the House Dems got pummeled. I'm not sure if these 5 or 6 guys are personally vulnerable, but I bet that most of the other conservative Dems in the House are.
That's my point, though. At some point, it's every representative for himself, and these guys will forever be more conservative-than-thou if they can be seen to obstruct and bend the health care legislation to their will. In their districts, they will have shored themselves up against any damage done to Democrats' national reputation by the negotiation and passage of this bill, while still being able to take credit for the final product when they decide it satisfies them.
These guys need to be paid off, in some way, if you want this to move out of committee. I don't know if it can be done without gutting the bill, but there's only so long to cut a deal before we possibly lose one of our sixty filibuster-closing votes in the Senate.
July 24, 2009 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or does this and the other debates going on now presage a split in the parties? It seems to me that the Blue Dogs and the sane Republicans have more in common with each other than they do with either the loony Repubs who dominate the party or the liberal Democrats. People end up voting on party affiliation now, but it seems we would have a system that's much more representative of the public's views if the two main parties were the Blue Dogs and liberals. Granted, it'd be hard to actually do such a major overhaul, but with the Republicans dwindling it might happen.
July 23, 2009 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really think that all of these crazy GOP talking points are taking their toll.
Here is Bill O'Reilly unveiling the newest.
http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=2266
July 23, 2009 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are these guys really this stupid? If health care reform doesn't pass...they are the first ones that are going to get their butts booted out of office.
Guess what...health care didn't pass, and that's part of why Republicans cleaned y'alls clock in the 90's. You'd think they would have realized that doing the EXACT SAME THING wouldn't be the smartest of moves.
Trying to be too cute by half, and failing miserably. Mark my words - if health care reform dies - every single person on this list will be beaten in the midterms. Every, single, one.
And they'll deserve it.
July 23, 2009 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
We need to make a big sign with this written on it and mail it to these dumbasses:
"If health care reform doesn't pass...they are the first ones that are going to get their butts booted out of office."
July 23, 2009 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody send these guys their "I Am Jim DeMint's Bitch!" T-shirts. They earned them.
July 23, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Christian magazine Worldmag.com had reported that Shuler does currently live there(C Street), along with Sens. Jim DeMint and Tom Coburn, and Reps. Zach Wamp, Mike Doyle, and Bart Stupak.
Maybe just send them T-shirts with their address on them.
July 23, 2009 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
www.cafepress.com
For very little money, you can customize your message and put it on a t-shirt, hat, coffee cup, beer stein, jacket, hoodie, bookbag, etc.
I think "I am Jim DeMint's Bitch" has a nice ring to it.
I'm also partial to "My Senator Went on Vacation and All I Got Was This Disqualification Letter from Blue Cross."
The possibilities are endless.
July 23, 2009 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I blame ourselves for voting and supporting these assholes.
July 23, 2009 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody needs to remind jackass Stupak that Michigan's unemployment rate is something like 15% and most of those unemployed have NO HEALTHCARE. It is probably even higher in the UP where he is from.
These southern guys, well, there really isn't much hope for them because they are from the south. But Stupak? What a fucking jackass.
July 23, 2009 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why do Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer not punish these people? Surely there's a way of making sure they don't get money for something.
July 23, 2009 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really don't get what's so hard for people to understand about this concept: Reid, Durban, Pelosi and Hoyer are not elected to their leadership positions by a popular vote of the people. They're elected by the members of their caucus. Leaders who are too punitive and heavy handed have a way of triggering coups the first time they stumble.
Happens to the supposedly disciplined leader-worshipping Republicans when
July 24, 2009 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
If we step back for a minute from the far left and far right, we see the majority of Americans. Polls are trending against Obama’s Universal Health Insurance plan overall for citizens. I think what many liberals and progressives forget is that alot of the democrats that voted for Obama are “died-in-the-wool” democrats from the large baby-boomer block. Most of these people are older democrats that don’t even know that “progressive” is an ideology. I personally know alot of folks that are long-time/die-hard union supporters, and therefore voted for Obama, yet don’t agree with his progressive agendas. Quite frankly, alot of these “democrats” are shocked to see that he is now pushing agenda’s that favor minorities with quota systems (politically correct term is affirmative-action), going on a world apology tour, and stifling middle America with Cap and Trade taxes-based on a Kyoto protocol that is NOT being honored by China, India, Russia, and Mexico. I predict that as more and more baby-boomer democrats across American catch on to Obama’s progressive agenda, they will be turned off, and realize that he, along with the rest of the progressives in Congress, are not like Bill Clinton at all. Obama makes Bill Clinton look conservative. Another point is that most Americans don’t understand the “progressive” philosophies that have been taught in our universities for the last several decades. They don’t have a clue! They are starting to catch on because of Fox News. If the progressive democrats want to hold Congress in 2010, they will need to face reality and become more like the fiscally conservative blue dog democrats. Ordinary citizens are starting to see the basic differences in the worldviews of the conservative republicans, and progressive democrats. Just my 2 cents worth.
July 24, 2009 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
My hope is that the middle and lower economic will come to realize that they have little power in the Democratic Party, and none in the Republican Party.
Then maybe we could start toward building toward a politcal party that does represent us. Bailing out wall street and corporate interests. Unnecessary wars for oil interests. The government has unlimited money for that.
But basic health care seems to be too expensive. Is it possible to be so delusional that you can possibly believe government works for its citizens?
Thanks for trying Mr. Obama, by the corporations won again.
July 24, 2009 7:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who has the power to change committee assignments? Could Harry Reid replace enough of them with health-care friendly Democrats to break their block?
July 24, 2009 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe that attempting to reform healthcare is just a well planned out means for the Repubs to promote Obama's failure. If all take a real thorough look at the general behavior of the Repubs since January and are willing to be honest THIS ALL BOILS DOWN TO RACISM!
July 24, 2009 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dude...not everything has to do with racism.
July 24, 2009 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mike Ross' financial dislosure form is found on many sites and blogs by now. This profile has embedded it as a pdf file. If you go to page 5 (of 8), you'll see that Ross receives hefty proceeds from the sale of the assets of his pharmacy - annual income ranging from $100,001 to $1,000,000. What bothered some commenters is that he and his wife still own 100% of the stock! With dividends like these, he may not need much in the way of campaign contributions from the healthcare and pharma industries.
July 24, 2009 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meant to include that Ross is the Co-Chair for Health Reform in the caucus. That's how he's been identified by the cable news shows. Ed Schultz had a caller suggest that we call these members the Blue Cross Dogs.
July 24, 2009 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink