TPMDC
« Nelson: No Deadlines--Or Taxes On The Wealthy--For Health Reform | Home | Rhode Island Tea Partiers Banned From 4th Of July Parade For Life Several Days »

Citing CBO-Director's Statements, Senate Centrists Urge Slower Pace For Health Care Reform

Six key Senate Centrists--Ben Nelson (D-NE), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Ron Wyden (D-OR)--are asking Democratic and Republican leaders to slow down the pace of health care reform efforts.

"[I]n the view of [CBO Director Doug Elmendorf's] statement, there is much heavy lifting ahead," reads a letter the group signed today. "We look forward to working with you to develop legislation that is vital to the well-being of the American people and urge you to resist timelines which prevent us from achieving the best results."

According to Huffington Post's Ryan Grim, who first obtained the letter, "The organized effort to slow down the process is a blow to the reform effort." And, indeed, there letter exemplifies a growing sense among centrists and health reform skeptics that the pace of reform should be slowed down. But it's also a restatement of very publicly held views. Earlier today, Nelson himself appeared on CNN and suggested congressional health care leaders should not to move too quickly.


134 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

corrupt hacks.

user-pic

Wyden isn't a corrupt hack.

user-pic

Wyden is one of the good guys. Obama called him "too radical". That's a sure indication he's got the people in mind.

user-pic

check out his open secrets.org page for the 2010 cycle

note #1 of his "Top 5 By Industry"

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?CID=N00007724

user-pic

Actually, most of the money was from "health professionals" rather than insurers and etc. Physicians, nurses, and other health care workers were looking for an ally in him on the floor... now we're not so sure.

user-pic

Exactly. I am not thrilled with the House tri-committee bill because it prevents a large number of people from access to the public option because they are not poor enough to qualify for it, for example. So I would not want to rush that through as is but take the time to do the heavy lifting to get it right. Obviously I don;t speak for Senator Wyden, but him saying let's slow down and do this right is not an indication that he is status quo or wanting to slow-walk this to kill reform.

We get one real bite at this apple, the bill has to be fundamentally sound in many HUGE areas or this will sink us. I am all for taking the time to get it right so this doesn't bite us in the ass, and that the reform legislation WORKS the way it needs to.

There is far too much pitchfork and torches going on here.

user-pic

I don't like the idea of limiting access to the public option, either, but if a limited access public option is all we can get through the Senate this time around, better that than no public option, or no health care reform bill, at all. If there's a system with a limited public option, then it can be built on to widen access to it.

Not that I'm against pushing for a fully-available public option if it looks doable without risking having the bill killed altogether. Does Wyden have an assessment of the chances of actually winning on this issue?

user-pic

This isn't about pitchforks; it's about the fact that slowing down the process is almost certainly not going to lead to a better (i.e. more progressive) bill. It's either going to kill it entirely or give the Senate "moderates" more leeway to kill the public option, push through their tax on "Cadillac" health plans (read: union-negotiated benefits) and otherwise turn health care reform into the Insurance Industry Relief Act 2009.

We're not going to get a better bill than the House bill, but we certainly get a worse one, which what delay will help them do.

user-pic

Actually, I think it's more accurate to say that Wyden's at least on the right side (i.e., left) of the aisle, not that he's one of the good guys. As one of my senators, and as one with whom I was thoroughly unimpressed during a town hall meeting in my neighborhood years ago, I've been following him pretty carefully over the years. As far back as I can remember, he has never stood up or stuck his neck out for any truly progressive causes, and has always been somewhat of a mealy-mouthed, non-committal wimp. I've pulled my hair out more than once in frustration that as a Democratic senator from Oregon, he has been unwilling to champion anything resembling a liberal or progressive agenda. Most politicos I know in the Democratic party see him as a pure, generally unprincipled opportunist. You may recall that he never even endorsed either candidate during the primaries -- even after they were all over!

Truly ironic, then, that the one time he decides to take a stand, it's on a matter that is intended to slow down progressive reform of the health care industry. Oh, and I should point out that Nate Silver, of 538 site fame, predicted Wyden would be, at best, a fence sitter based on industry contributions.

user-pic

Lestat,

my impression of Wyden is that he was a real liberal when in the House, but when he won his Senate seat he seems to have moved to the right a little. I always liked the guy, but I liked him better when he was in the House.

user-pic

Agreed. The Wyden of today is not the Wyden that served in the House at all.

user-pic

And I remember liking Joe Lieberman when he was Attorney General in Connecticut.

user-pic

I liked Paul Wellstone, but he's no longer with us-- and neither is Wyden.

user-pic

Wyden is one of the bad guys.

The plan he's pushing is employer-based and for-profit.

user-pic

Ads need to be taken out that highlight these six jackasses, and paint them as defending the status quo.

user-pic

You got that right. I can think of a number of other things I would also like to see done to them as well. And these things are not suitable for younger audiences.

C

user-pic

many believe the Elmendorf stunt was in response to the OFA/DNC ads running earlier in the week - Nebraska was targeted

clearly nothing from Reid, but maybe WH will pushback just a little harder this time

user-pic

STOP CALLING THESE PEOPLE 'CENTRISTS'!

They are not moderates, they are not centrists. Over 70% of the country wants a public health care plan - and they want it NOW.

Please, stop doing these yahoos a favor by calling them the "center" of anything. The headline to this should read "Corporate Senators Urge Slower Pace".

user-pic

You are right that at least Wyden isn't a centrist. But you are out of your mind if you think he is corporately owned. Wyden is a principled senator. I guarantee you he only signed on because of the CBO commentary.

Which makes me wonder, why aren't we all more concerned about this? If it's going to be just as effing expensive--though it will cover more people--shouldn't we be putting pressure on folks to fix that part? We aren't doing any favors to ourselves by ignoring it.

user-pic

So what is this "cost" they keep discussing? Cost to the federal government? What about "cost" to the American people, is that figured in? How about the $75,000 an uninsurable friend had to pay a few years ago for hospitalization after an automobile accident, ON TOP of what he could collect from the driver's insurance? Is that "cost" figured in? Today it would probably be $100,000.

Sheesh. Just cut it out of the damned Defense Department "Unneeded weapons" budget.

user-pic

His actions no longer comport with those of an independent "unbought" Senator. Methinks your past impressions of this one time liberal are no longer valid. Exhibit A is his alliance with these scumbags on this issue.

user-pic

Here is more from Wyden on the alternative plan he is proposing (PDF). He makes comments about the CBO having scored a plan of this kind which actually provides savings, further evidence that the CBO scoring of the current plan out of committee is what is bothering him:

http://wyden.senate.gov/newsroom/free_choice_proposal.pdf

user-pic

Excellent point!

user-pic

To paraphrase the nut job from Virginia Catherine Crabill: We fought this battle at the ballot box maybe we have to resort to the bullet box.

user-pic

Works for me.


C

user-pic

Guys.... No.

You are becoming what you hate, even if you only say it in jest, and you sully the reputation of this site with that kind of talk.

user-pic

Oh, bullshit. What they hate is right wing , corrupt politicians bought and paid for by insurance companies. Are they "becoming" that?

Get your head out of your ass. It's okay to hate the people trying to prop up a corrupt system that's literally killing tens of thousands of your fellow citizens every year.

user-pic

Awesome comment and true. These six are holding up progress- meanwhile real people DIE.

user-pic

Yes REAL PEOPLE DIE! Every god damned day! There is no excuse for delay at all. These assholes have had YEARS and YEARS to ponder what reform means.

There is one of the oldest moral questions here on the table and it is when you have one person causing the deaths of many is it MORAL to kill that one person and save the lives of the many. Do the math. I certainly do not advocate killing anyone, but here we meet the reason liberals never get what is right and decent accomplished in this country, because they are too timid to push back HARD! People are literally dying everyday ..... but liberals don't want to upset anyone .... cowards!

user-pic

Why don't you quit admiring the view, and instead pull your own head out of yours?

It's never "okay to hate" to the point of suggestion that a politician or elected official should be physically assaulted or even killed, simply for the act of expressing a differing point of view from one's own.

Period.

user-pic

What "diffrent point of view?" Delay in enacting health care reform is killing people every day. These swine have blood on their hands. They don't have a "different point of view;" they are abetting the negligent homicide of thousands of your fellow citizens.

user-pic

Is bitchslapping ok?

user-pic

No. However you may feel about someone, it is not OK to advocate killing them, even in jest. There's entirely too much of that sort of thing on the other side, and God forbid that we should mirror it.

user-pic

The response must be equal to the threat. Sometimes the only way to stop people from killing you is to kill them first.

However, that is NOT what we are dealing with here. This is not a revolutionary type situation and people should not be using that type of language.

What we have is simply put a by-product of corporate person-hood. These Senators know that votes are the products of dollars, and not how they vote. Therefore, they are taking the money from health insurance companies and trying to kill health care reform.

People are right to be angry. But they should respond by with the letters, phone calls, votes, and campaign contributions to the opposing candidates.

user-pic

Uh, no.

Your suggestion that one must threaten physical violence against those with whom one disagrees - even when offered in jest - is highly inappropriate, and further hints that indeed, Catherine Crabill isn't alone in the category of "nut job".

user-pic

Why not take their violent reactions as a measure of their anger? It's okay to be angry sometimes. In fact, it pays big dividends. These corrupt politicoes and insurance company execs SHOULD be afraid!

user-pic

It is OK to be angry. It is not OK to use or threaten violence to express that anger.

user-pic

You don't think you can express anger strongly enough without suggesting gun violence? Your husband/wife must love that.

Anyone who swaggers about muttering things about the "bullet box" when discussing legislation has clearly lost perspective, no matter which side of the issue they're on. Let's leave that kind of scary posturing to the nasty, dimwitted Freepers, OK?

user-pic

You have the gall to accuse HIM of "losing perspective?" Wyden and the rest are abetting the deaths of helpless people being denied health care EVERY DAY. Try THAT perspective, wise guy.

user-pic

That" anger" - I actually prefer the term "exhausted patience" - is so noted, and has been for some time.

There's an old Persian priverb: "Dogs bark, but the caravan passes."

Let the dogs bark. These six senators represent a definable minority of opinion. Rational adults will duly acknoeledge said "caution" and simply move on. If one of those six are from your own state, then call their offices, to the point of distration if necessary.

But any appeal to violence during the course of a political debate is unacceptable. Such appeals are the mark of the coward and dullard.

user-pic

Oh, come off it. What "appeal to violence?" All he did was quote some right wing harpy. Not everybody can achieve your apparent level of perfection all the time, y'know. Maybe if your health insurance was cancelled after you'd been diagnosed with cancer, you'd feel angry, too!

user-pic

God, I have so had it with these assholes. Why don't we just send everyone else in Congress home and let them do all the legislating?

user-pic

So what can we do?

I live in ME and have written about 20 emails to Collins and Snowe regarding this issue. They clearly do not give a shit. Their approval ratings are high locally and Wellpoint controls about 90% of the insurance in ME.

I am getting the feeling the Senate is going go f@&k us on healthcare reform once again.

user-pic

What else can you do?

Organize.

In fact...the best thing would be visit Organizing for America's website, and I'm SURE there are some healthcare meetings going on near you.

20 emails from you, versus 20 emails from a group of 20 people...the group is much more powerful. Start building your group. That's what grassroots community organizing is all about.

user-pic

Been doing that. I am beginning to think that 400 emails or 4000 emails are not going to get Snowe or Collins to change their position.

It is hard not to get frustrated.

user-pic

Go ahead with the legislation. Let them filibuster their own party. They'll be digging their own graves.

user-pic

I notice "the letter" doesn't mention filibuster.

60 - 4 = 56. (2 are ReThugs)

More than enough votes to pass.

user-pic

Yes. Lets only slow down enough to let the CBO score the house or Senate Single-Payer plans!

HR 676 (http://www.pnhp.org/publications/united_states_national_health_care_act_hr_676.php)

or Senate Bill S.703 (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-703

user-pic

Let's find something each of these clowns really want and apply a little pressure. Since Nelson is from Nebraska I betcha he wouldn't appreciate the senate leadership slow walking his favorite ag program. Maybe cutting it a few billion will get his attention. If they want to play hardball, play hardball.

user-pic

Lets cut the bullshit, they want to "slow it down" so they can either scuttle the whole bill or at least get rid of the public option.

user-pic

That is absolutely correct. They want time to scuttle the whole thing.

C

user-pic

Nonsense. Wyden does not want to scuttle public option or reform.

user-pic

What evidence do you have that he wants a public option?

All I can see from Wyden is fake reform designed to keep insurance companies fat & happy.

user-pic

This for starters:

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

“There is a rumor making the rounds that Sen. Wyden supports the Snowe proposal for a public option "trigger." That rumor is false. It never happened and he has at no time expressed support for this idea.

“As happens so often both around Congress and across the Internet, false information gets spread and repeated until even well-meaning commentators begin to adopt and repeat the false information as if it were fact. This appears to have happened with former Secretary Reich, and we regret that he fell victim to this rumor.

“Senator Wyden’s Healthy Americans Act has for more than two and a half years contained a provision allowing states to pursue their own public option on “Day One.” This happens to track the approach recommended by the Oregon Health Fund Board. His legislation would also require the Federal government to establish a public option in any state that lacked a variety of health plan choices equal to what Members of Congress currently receive. Both of these provisions, however, are a far cry from the Snowe proposal.

“With regard to a national public option, Senator Wyden has made clear that he is not wed to the approach he put forward in 2006 and is open to a national public option on Day One -- not requiring the Snowe "trigger" -- if it is accompanied by real reform that is responsibly and sustainably financed.”

user-pic

I think Wyden is riding both sides of the fence- taking cash from lobbyists and siding with Landrieu, Lieberman, and Nelson on one side. On the other, playing to the liberals with his, admittedly, better public option proposal that he knows will never pass.

Otherwise, why sign the letter with these 5 clowns?

user-pic

Wyden is a pimp for the insurance companies.

user-pic

He was liberal when it was advantageous for him to be liberal. Sounds like an opportunist of the first stripe, or else he better make it pretty darned clear ASAP what changes HE thinks need to be made as opposed to LIEberMan and friends.

user-pic

Tell you what, Senators. Let's delay your lovely health care coverage, mark it all "DENIED" for you & your families, for even a single month.

Oh, the screams & shouts that Ye Entitled would give out with, you privileged few of our nation to be blessed with decent health care coverage.

user-pic

I'm embarrassed to say I contributed to Ron Wyden's last campaign. Needless to say, that won't happen again. Wyden, Lieberman, Nelson, and a couple of Republicans.. who would have thought?

user-pic

Wow, their idle stance is breath taking in that it shows just how awful and dangerous Bill Nelson and his terrible ilk are for this nation. Let’s not forget Nelson and these band of losers gave us a watered down and less potent version of the stimulus bill. They need to go. When the going gets tough these coward obstructionists want to stop all progress. But then again why worry their health care is excellent. Funny I don’t recall these cretins slowing down the Iraq process because we were moving to quickly.

user-pic

If they even TRY to get rid of the public option, then it's clear they don't give a damn about controlling costs. They care about ensuring health insurance companies pockets are continued to line with money.

user-pic

OK, that's freakin' IT! I'm giving money to anyone running against Nelson, Wyden or Landrieu. I don't care which party. No point having "Democrats" who pull this kind of nonsense.

user-pic

Wyden just lost my vote two years from now. Lars Larson can run against him, and I still don't give a shit. What a goddamned sell-out.

user-pic

You have lost your mind.

user-pic

Give these Champions of the Status Quo a ring:

Lieberman-(202) 224-4041
Landrieu- (202) 224-5824
Nelson- (202) 224-6551
Snowe-(202) 224-5344
Collins-(202) 224-2523
Wyden-(202) 224-5244


user-pic

Obama can break Wyden and Lieberman. Time to play hardball.

user-pic

I wish they would collectively get hit by a train.

I am so sick of these same characters holding up every single bill that can actually improve our lives.

And Wyden? WTF? When did he become such a d-bag?

user-pic

Is there any way to stop calling these assholes 'centrists?'
They're thieves, all of them, and Capone's Chicago judges didn't take as many monthly bribes.
The standout in this lineup?
What about Nelson?
That right-wing obstructionist with his pockets forever full of insurance and drug money, with convictions as crooked as the upper loops of the North Platte.
And they do it right out in the open, unashamed, fearing neither jail nor Democratic umbrage, except maybe from poor Durbin, and they don't care what anybody thinks.
I hate every goddamned one of them.

user-pic

Wyden is no thief. Many of the statements in this thread are unhinged.

user-pic

It sounds like you haven't been paying attention through the health care debate. Wyden is liberal in general, but on health he's repeatedly shown himself to be bought & paid for.

user-pic

With him rising to defend Wyden on every negative comment, it sounds like he's on Wyden's payroll or is a relative of his.
The problems with healthcare have been growing over the years.
This isn't some national problem that suddenly appeared out of nowhere.
LIEbermann helped scuttle healthcare reform in 1994. A worthless piece of shit if there ever was one.
Landriue is likely toast as a Dem in Louisiana since Katrina wiped out a l;ot of Dems out of New Orleans, so she "thinks" acting like a Repub will keep herself in power.
Collins and Snowe are Republicans who are trying to milk the canard that they are "sensible" Repubs... an oxymoron if there ever was one.
Nelson is afraid of any legislation that might be termed progressive and is in the pocket of the fat-cats. A Dem in name only if there ever was one.
I know little about Wyden. However his position on this issue, especially in the face of last year's election campaign and Obama's promise to reform the system, shows that he's either terribly naive on how the Senate or Washington works and is therefore a willing dupe, hiding behind his own sense of self-worth. Or he is actually in the pocket of the trigger-lobby who have no worry in the world with regard to their own family's healthcare.

user-pic

Lestatdelc is by no means a sockpuppet. Such a blithe accusation without any facts is red-baiting.

user-pic

What horse-shit. Not on his payroll at all, but as he is my Senator and I know people who work for him, I know he is not trying to slow-walk this to kill it or defend the status quo. Wyden has been pushing for years now comprehensive reform and has had his own bill to do so making the rounds for over a year now.

This is why the stupid comments claiming Wyden is a thief, is a traitorous asshole trying to kill reform is just that... stupid, uninformed comments.

user-pic

Well, I for one would like to know why Wyden cast his lot with these "characters" who are clearly out to kill or water down the bill then. He hasn't explained himself at all except to sign off on the need for more "bi-partisanship" aka turn the bill into Republican lite.

user-pic

Paging Sen. Reid.

Remember "Lieberman is with us on everything but the war"?

Except who should be President. And EFCA. And Healthcare. And the war.

user-pic

Wyden's staff is hanging up on callers who are not from Oregon. I guess he thinks this only affects voters in Oregon. As soon as you tell them your zip code they hang up without even saying thank you.

user-pic

So? lie to them. It ain't hard to look up a zip from Portland or Eugene. DiFi's office did that to me a long time ago. Now, I am ready when I call a Senator, I look up a zipcode before I call. Hell, these people lie all the time. I have no problem lying to them esp. when they are acting like tin pot dictators.

user-pic
user-pic

So Barry how'd that kissing up to Lieberman working out for you?

Yo, Harry - how's it working out for you? He's ,like, such an awesome Democrat ain't he Harry?

user-pic

Do tell us, slow down for what?? How long? What needs to be resolved before you're willing to say, let's go??

user-pic

agree.

not one of these clowns was crying "slow down !" less than a month ago on the $126B Supplemental for open ended war - or the $26B going to bail out European banks

user-pic

This is a really important point. They may have genuine concerns about the bill, or they might be slowing it down in order to scuttle it or win concessions.

The only way for us to tell the difference is if we get some concrete explanations rather than the letter's vague "heavy lifting" and needs more time excuses.

I think it is important to make sure this bill reduces costs. The CBO may be full of it, but if he is, then the administration has to come out and layout a reasonable case for it along with evidence.

What is important is that this determination is made with a plan to go forward so that we reach a definite conclusion and either fix the bill or fix the Senators.

What is damning about the letter is that it lays out the case for delay, rather than a process of what needs to get done during that delay.

user-pic

Look, let's have some honesty here. Elmendorf IS CORRECT. In country after country it's been shown that a single payer system of one kind or another is the ONLY proven effective way to squeeze costs out of a health-care system. If anybody in the Democorporate party actually cared about reducing costs rather than servicing the health-insurance industry, that's what we'd be getting.

user-pic

Yeah, except he walked back his own statements.

http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/16/elmendorf-cost/

"In testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee, Elmendorf walked back his comments, saying that in some ways federal spending will increase and in some ways it will decrease. When pressured by the Republicans on the committee, Elmendorf did not directly confirm his accusations."

I agree, though. Single-payer would be best. I'd love to see the CBO's projection for that.

user-pic

The CBO needs to score SIngle Payer! Something to hit the bastards over the head with. How many people will be left to die this year in our for profit system? Score that! What is anyone's life worth to the corporate Dems? Someone should knock them on their ass next time they try to walk into a church or a synagogue.

user-pic

I'm in Maine as well, I've left Snowe and Collins emails also. I can understand reluctance to involve government in more businesses, but at some point the games must stop our lives are at stake.

user-pic

I recommend that everyone who is mad and concerned by these assholes call the DNC and let them know you won't give a fucking nickel if they don't go public in their opposition to the "Gang of the Willing". If they block reform and the public option and harry Reid has no repercussions for them then he nust be removed from the Moajority leader role because he is no leader but the ultimate whip ass. I called Baucus and Nelson's office at lunch and the staff are flat worn out from the calls. Mobilize and show your anger and demand accountabilty. Lieberman's vm was full.

user-pic

Wyden is no thief. Many of the statements in this thread are unhinged.

BS They are all thieves. It's just a matter of degree.

C

user-pic

Sorry to hear your cynicism has gotten to the point where you have left reality.

user-pic

I am sorry to hear that you are out of realty. What these people so euphemistically refer to as campaign contributions are brides and pay offs. Nothing else.

C

user-pic

So I was bribing President Obama when I contributed to his campaign, or when I contributed to Rep. Wu, or Oregon Attorney General Kroger... or Senator Wyden?

Who knew?

user-pic

Move too quickly? Are they out of their minds? Health care reform has already been delayed by decades!

I guess Nebraskans must have great health care. Or is Ben Nelson taking better care of the health care interests than his constituents?

user-pic

Just called Ben Nelson's office and told his receptionist that if he wants to save money offer a medical malpractice public option amendment for doctors. MM insurance is as big a monopoly scam in most states as health insurance. Their rates bear no relationship to actual med mal lawsuits but the three decade long PR campaign by the insurance cos and GOP aided and abetted by the media has resulted in dozens of states passing tort reform anyway. That hasn't driven down the cost of med mal insurance. A public med mal option will. Besides lowering providers' cost of doing business it'll end their justification for ordering unnecessary tests, procedures and therapies.

You can call or write Ben Nelson here:

Washington, D.C.
720 Hart Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: (202) 224-6551
Fax: (202) 228-0012

user-pic

They need to explain which of these options they support then.

From Ezra:

"a) Support, as the CBO says you should, the eradication of the tax exclusion that protects employer-based health-care insurance;

b) Support, as Lewin and Commonwealth say you should, a public insurance option that can bargain at Medicare's rates;

c) Support, as the Office of Management and Budget and every health-care wonk in town says you should, one of the various policies floating around to give MedPAC authority to continually reform and modernize Medicare;

d) Support some form of aggressive cost-sharing that would make people extremely angry because it will save money by reducing their access to health-care services;

e) Support comparative effectiveness review that can judge not only the effectiveness but also the cost-effectiveness of various treatments, and give the federal government authority to use that data when deciding reimbursement rates.

I would also like to propose a related rule: any reporters who receive a quote from a politician referencing this CBO score should be required to ask the politician which of these policies -- or which alternative cost-saving policies -- they support."

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/07/rules_for_commenting_on_the_cb.html

To simply use the CBO chairman's words yesterday as gospel, especially since he has walked that statement back, is disingenuous in the very least.

Explain yourselves and why you are entitled to gold-plated coverage, Senators, and we are not!!!

user-pic

Well said.

user-pic

Damnit!! I am sick and tired of these obstructionists. MoveOn.org needs to do a commercial in every one of their home states listing their names and showing their pictures along with a list of their campaign contributions from every insurance, healthcare, pharma that they took campaign bribes from. Then list their phone numbers, both home and DC. It's time for Obama to play hardball with these assholes.

The longer they wait on this, the longer the corrupt lobbyists have to work on the weak legislators and the more time they have to water down this bill.

user-pic

The fear is what will happen over the break. Do we want this passed so a campaign can't be mounted or do we take that risk.

user-pic

Does the CBO have plans to rate a Single Payer plan? If the Public Option plan fails, it might be a good way to push a Single Payer plan by saying, "you were against the Public Option because it was too expensive. Single Payer will cost less over time. You have no excuse for opposing Single Payer."

user-pic

Yes! CBO needs to score Single Payer! If it's money that worries you then Single Payer is the way to go.

user-pic

Does the CBO have plans to rate a Single Payer plan? If the Public Option plan fails, it might be a good way to push a Single Payer plan by saying, "you were against the Public Option because it was too expensive. Single Payer will cost less over time. You have no excuse for opposing Single Payer."

No. The CBO doesn't do its own analyses. It only does cost analyses at the request of the majority or minority leadership. (It would also need to have precise information about what the contours of a Single Payer plan would be - what would it cover, etc).
And pushing for Single Payer is an exercise in futility. It doesn't have the support of the President and couldn't get 20 votes in the Senate.

user-pic

I know. I know.

Common Sense is off the table. You couldn't get 20 votes for Common Sense.

As long as California gets the same votes in the Senate as Alabama, and New York gets the same as Wyoming.... America is screwed. We should have lost the Civil War and joined the civilized world when we had the chance.

user-pic

Let's mobilize to get the "public option" they enjoy at our expense canceled until they pass reform on health care. We give them health care at lower costs then any of us pay and with choices of many different levels of care. I'd like to see a politician with the balls introduce a bill to cancel their health care until we can get what they have at their level of cost. I just called the White House now and left this message. Immediate coverage terminated - that is change I can believe in!

user-pic

I'd like to ask Ben Nelson why hes a Democrat.

user-pic

This letter really gives no reason at all for a delay.

user-pic

Unless these so-called "moderates" are willing to join a Republican filibuster to stop health care reform, I don't care what they think. Snowe and Collins might filibuster, but the price to pay for the Democrats (even Lieberman) would be too high to pay.

user-pic

I don't get it. A substantial majority of voters wants this done asap.

user-pic

This letter really gives no reason at all for a delay.

Yes it does. It says that bipartisan support is crucial and that more work is needed in order to bipartisan support. You may not like the reason but it is a reason.

user-pic

Bipartisan support is pie in the sky. Republicans are not going to vote for this bill, probably not even Snowe and Collins. So why bother with trying to win over the Party of No, letting them water down the bill only to vote against it anyway? That's what happened with the stimulus, and look how well that turned out: a too-weak effort that doesn't quite cut the mustard, and that Republicans can now point to and say "See? We knew it would fail."

The difference is, I think there was no choice then, because so many Blue Dogs voted against it as well.

user-pic

To all who are excoriating Wyden, go read Ezra Klein's posts on his positions and role in the health care debate. Don't know why Wyden has joined the feet-of-clayers, but it's most likely cuz he wants a better bill. Wyden knows his health care s***, and has proven himself for years on this issue. Read up before you spew. As for Nelson, Lieberdouche, etc. - I'm with everyone who says we (including TPM) needs to stop calling these gutless opportunists 'centrists.' I think Krugman was pretty much on the money that these egomaniacal clowns (particularly Lieberdouche and Nelson) see a once in a lifetime, golden opportunity for career aggrandizement and narcissistic preening. They are callow opportunists, nothing more or less. Centrist my ass. More like four sheets to the wind. Where was their precious principle when BushCo was destroying the country? I say start tagging them with what they are - gutless opportunists, the kind that hide when the bullets are flying only to emerge in the relatively safe aftermath to vigorously protest that the rebuilding isn't to their satisfaction. Makes me wanna puke.

user-pic

Thank you. That is why I have been defending Wyden in this thread. He is not looking to slow-walk this to kill it or maintain the status quo. He has been working at real reform for years. As for the others, I wouldn't trust Lieberman as far as I could toss him and Nelson is pure retrograde and the only thing he brings to the table is his vote on organizing resolutions to put the Dems in control of the chamber, beyond that, he is GOIp for all intents and purposes. Snowe, Collins.. they are GOP, enough said.

user-pic

Really what WAS Wyden thinking by signing this letter with these clowns? If he was smart he would not have touched this letter with a ten foot pole. He should've put out his own letter and explained his reasons. Something he has yet to do. Smells bad and he has no one to blame but himself for people's reactions for him joining up with these clowns.

Generally, I trust Wyden- but this doesn't look good at all.

user-pic

Lieberman is a Centrist?

You jest.....

user-pic

All of these people are untrustworthy scum. They should all be replaced. It is them and their willingness to carry the water for the most parasitic interests that are holding this country back time and again. It's time to put a stop to such malevolence. Centrism my ass, this is a simple and clear cut case of prostitution by a bunch of political whores.

user-pic

Deep breaths. Will help your blood pressure. And no, these people are not scums. You are way too much in the pitchfork and torches mode to see clearly it seems.

user-pic

Wrong. They most certainly ARE scum--Lieberman and Nelson especially.

And as for what you consider seeing clearly... well you do your thing and I'll do mine okay?

user-pic

Fine. Break out the tar and feathers and look like an uninformed ass then. It's certainly a free country.

user-pic

"Weeping Joe" Lieberman would be a comical joke, except for the fact the he has a lot of monied interests willing to promote and protect and finance him. Scum? maybe not. More like "despicable scum."

When I see the likes of Lieberman wanting to drag his feet and keep this issue on the front burner for a longer period of time than is necessary, I can only cynically surmise that it is to "keep the bank open" for a little longer so his campaign contributors can keep the checks coming.

Despicable, parasitic scum. Looks like a cross between Howdy Doodie and Chuckie, and is able to promote nightmares in anyone who dreams of responsible government.

user-pic

These are the same people, Wyden excepted, who cleared the path for Sam Alito.

If you judge by results, this move should make you very worried.

user-pic

I agree. Obama/Emanuel need to push back and say delay the vote as long as needed, their recess will be delayed just as long. Lieberman has proven once again that he can't be trusted so people need to call and write Reid on why he allowed Lieberman to keep his leadership position.

user-pic

This is when not having a healthy Ted Kennedy in the Senate every day, beating these people up, really hurts. It allows folks like Baucus and Conrad and Nelson to be sticks in the mud mostly for the purpose of them being able to say, "Look, I'm important...and I'm not a DFH!" Kennedy is respected on both sides of the aisle and is as close to a "master of the Senate" as we've had since LBJ. And health care is pretty much his thing. Sadly, he can't be there every day or even once a week, so we get this stuff. I'm all for getting this right but what I don't see are the folks proposing any solid ideas that will allow us to "get it right".

If there isn't concrete legislation out of both houses before the August recess, the chance of passing any kind of significant health care reform this year or even before Obama's first term is over is pretty much nil. I'm not saying they have to have something ready for Obama to sign - but get it out of committee and ready for a floor vote.

user-pic

And if Obama doesn't manage to get health care reform done in this term, he is at serious risk of being a one-term president, the only bright spot there being that the GOP has no candidates in the bullpen just now that don't inspire guffaws.

But if they do manage to get their act together before 2012 and Obama goes down, the country is going to be screwed over for another eight years, and heaven knows how far down the sinkhole we will have fallen by the time the electorate realizes once again that Republicans are very bad at governance.

user-pic

Josh is just too much. "The Senate wanker 6".

Ain't it the truth.

C

user-pic

The letter is idiotic.

Doug Elmendorf wrote that the House Health Care Reform would increase the cost to the federal government.

Of course it will. That's why the House bill raises taxes on the rich, to pay for the increased cost to the federal government.

But the Lieberman letter declares that the cost of "premiums" has to come down, and then pretends that Elmendorf was writing about the cost of premiums, which he wasn't.


user-pic

the only reason this causes me to pause is Wyden.
The other's are predictable, but I would like to hear Wyden's reasoning..it is usually well founded.

In truth, i don't know what this legislation entails yet, do you?

bad legislation is not good legislation.
a quick sell on a lemon is not good for obama ,dems or progressives...
I haven't read the bill, have you?
just asking.

user-pic

Exactly.

The gnashing of teeth in this thread, and its spill over onto the front page is pathetic. I understand and more than empathize with the passion many are expressing that we need serious reform with a robust public option (if not an outright single-payer system which is what I personally prefer).. but the unhinged quality of the comments is striking to say the least.

I usually expect (and get) more from the comments here that this thread gives.

user-pic

Have I mentioned lately, how much I hate Joe Lieberman?

user-pic

Why don't the names of the Senators involved here surprise me? I guess allowing good ol' Joe L. to keep his chairmanship and sit with the Dems really got him onboard with the administration.

The rest of the "Democrats" in this group should all face primaries against progressives come re-election time.

user-pic

Wyden is being given too much credit here.

He's incredibly arrogant on the subject of health care reform. While he's said he's "open" to a public plan option (I favor single payer btw) the WSJ article just linked gives the lie to that. He's also said he's "open" to a public plan "trigger."

As of three weeks ago, he'd taken $395,000 from insurance, pharma, hospitals & conservative AMA-type docs in this election cycle, and it isn't over yet & he's up for re-election next year. If you want to find the $ at Center for Responsive Politics' opensecrets.org you have to look not only at his campaign contributions but at his "leadership PAC" which is where most of the money & esp. the corporate money is.

Wyden has a major bipartisanship schtick and also a knee-jerk ideological commitment to purely "private" reform. The good ideas in his Healthy Americans Act, especially detaching health insurance from specific employers, are undercut by those facts, as well as bad ideas in that bill.

His motives are not, IMO, about the CBO, but about his relationships to the other five, which support his kingmaker aspirations on the issue.

Whatever one thinks of the merits of his own healthcare ideas, the fact is that politically they are not what is going to happen and that this is a political act supporting the politics of obstruction.

user-pic

Go the budget reconciliation route.

user-pic

Why do people keep calling these scumbags "centrist democrats"? They are hard core right wingers. There is nothing centrist about them and they always vote the fascist line.

user-pic

and this should surprise us how? hypocrisy has become the new statemanship.

user-pic

We need HR 676; and BIG MEDICINE will fight it tooth and nail because they'll go out of business and might go out of business with the current plan but not as likely.

If people knew the truth about single payer, especially those who aren't wealthy or are lucky enough to be in really excellent health, they would want it BIG TIME!

user-pic

We the American people have waited since Truman Administration for national health care. These senators “urge you to resist timelines which prevent us from achieving the best results" has been used by coalition of special interest since then to stall and prevent the public good. We need this NOW.

user-pic

Why do people not start comparing this issue to the goals of Al Queda?

The current murder for profit health care system and the senators who wish to not see it changed, support the same ideals as Al Queda. The death to as many Americans as possible.

The only difference is that the health care industry makes a profit while they are at it.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio


Latest Videos




Advertise Liberally