Gillibrand Takes Lead In Senate On Repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
Senate Democrats are perhaps set to start the ball rolling on repealing the ban on gays in the military, with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) announcing that hearings have been scheduled for the Armed Services Committee to examine the impact of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
"This policy is wrong for our national security and wrong for the moral foundation upon which our country was founded,'" Gillibrand said in a press release. "I thank Chairman Levin for agreeing to hold this important hearing. Numerous military leaders are telling us that the times have changed. 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' is an unfair, outdated measure that violates the civil rights of some of our bravest, most heroic men and women. By repealing this policy, we will increase America's strength - both militarily and morally."
Some people might suspect that Gillibrand could have a political motivation. She is an appointed Senator facing a 2010 primary challenge in a liberal state -- with the polls putting her challenger, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, narrowly ahead -- and would have something to gain from taking the point position on this. A spokesman said this is not politically motivated, drawing attention to the fact that Gillibrand had already been on the record for repealing DADT when she was still in the House.


















Excellent! Legislature is the way to go.
July 27, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/0709/Maloney_backing_away_from_Senate_race.html?showall
July 27, 2009 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course she's got a political motivation. She's a politician.
The way political progress is attained is through making the right thing to do also the politically advantageous thing to do. The fact that an operator like Gillibrand sees this as the right strategy is testament to the efforts of many.
July 27, 2009 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
How cynical have we gotten that a politician supporting a position that A) is the right thing to do, and B) is supported by the majority of her constituents; is considered to have 'political motivation' ?
Please note that the currently highest profile victim of this policy (besides the American public at large for loosing the service of all of these dedicated service members) is Lt. Dan Choi who is (or was, until his separation orders) stationed at Fort Drum in New York State - the jurisdiction that Gillibrand represents.
July 27, 2009 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Represented. She represents the entire state now. I imagine ones perspective tends to shift a little when that happens.
July 27, 2009 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG! Senator Gillibrand is actually doing something that a Democrat might do!
July 27, 2009 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink