Good Cop, Bad Cop? Baucus Says All Options Still On The Table
After telling Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) to put a public option in his health care bill, and strip it of a financing provision that would tax employer-provided health care benefits, Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid tried to assure Republicans that he wasn't abandoning bipartisanship. Now, Baucus is saying much the same.
"Everything's on the table," was Baucus' mantra yesterday. "By far the better approach is a bipartisan approach to get this moving."
These are palliative words, but they don't seem to have changed momentum on the Hill. Most indications suggest two key provisions that were recently expected to be included in the Senate Finance Committee's health care bill--health care co-operatives and the benefits tax--are on life support. That pleases reformers, but also makes them nervous. They abhor the co-op model--preferring a public insurance plan instead--and though their feelings about taxing benefits are mixed, they see no reason to ignite controversy when there are plenty of other, more-popular ways to finance reform. But at the same time, Finance is now way, way behind schedule, and there are precious few days left for them to complete work on a bill, merge it with the HELP Committee's bill, debate the final product on the floor, and bring it to a vote.


















R they for real?
July 9, 2009 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, if it doesn't sound like they're finally caught on that, for Republicans, "bipartisanship" is not a process involving mutual compromises to achieve a public good in a manner tolorable to both parties, but rather is a just a rhetorical trick to score points with the shamans of Broderism.
For Republicans, "bipartisan" means "we're going to write the bill the way we want it and then beseech you you to join us in voting for it and if you refuse, you're not being bipartisan and therefore will be condemned by the Villagers."
Maybe its too much to hope for, its sounds like maybe, just maybe, after bending over backwards for months to try to achieve a real compromise and getting nowhere, the Dems have finally decided to turn that trick against the Republicans.
Or, you know, maybe its just Dems showing their congenital inability to maintain a coherent narrative.
July 9, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Those aren't mutually exclusive, you know.
July 9, 2009 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Good cop, self-serving corrupt asshole pol" or so.
July 9, 2009 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find it funny that anyone takes Republicans seriously when they complain about the process not moving fast enough on healthcare (in Finance, anyway) and moving too fast on climate change, Sotomayor, etc. Gosh, one might imagine they're motivated only by which part of the process is most likely to get them what they want, and are completely lying about being railroaded, or having enough time to deliberate, or whatever their excuse for obstructionism is this week.
July 9, 2009 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do we even need a bill from the Finance Committee?
Why not let them founder for a few more weeks and then simply introduce the bill from HELP and debate that? If Finace can't get it together, too bad for them, and for Baucus, and for the R's who are obstructing the whole process.
July 9, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink