GOP-Approved Sotomayor Opponent Foresees Future Of Arab Internment Camps
The Senate Judiciary Committee will hear from all sides next week about Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court nomination, and, as we've already noted, the invitation list includes the Connecticut firefighters who've become a cause célèbre for conservative activists.
But the GOP has also called upon Peter Kirsanow--a Bush appointee who heads the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and testified on behalf of Samuel Alito four years ago--to question Sotomayor's fitness.
Who is Kirsanow, you ask? According to a 2002 Knight-Ridder report, he's this guy: "A member of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission said Friday that he could foresee a scenario in which the public would demand internment camps for Arab Americans if Arab terrorists strike again in this country."
If there's a future terrorist attack in America "and they come from the same ethnic group that attacked the World Trade Center, you can forget about civil rights," commission member Peter Kirsanow said.The reason, he said, is that "the public would be less concerned about any perceived erosion of civil liberties than they are about protecting their own lives."
Kirsanow, who was appointed to the commission last year by President Bush, said that he personally doesn't support internment camps and the government would never envision setting them up. He said he was merely saying public opinion would so strongly favor the idea that it would be difficult to prevent. There would be a "groundswell of opinion" for such detentions, he said.
Speaking before the Heritage Foundation earlier that year, Kirsanow said affirmative action had "metastasized into a racial spoils system consisting of preferences, quotas, and set-asides." Strong words for the commissioner of an organization with the below mission statement.
To investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices.To study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice.
To appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice.
To serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin.
To submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
To issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws.


















I just want to take the moment to compare what Michelle Bachmann said a little while back:
Perhaps if Kirsanow had attempted to perform a Census then the right would see a problem here?
July 9, 2009 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nicely done. Another reason why we ought to be able to rec comments here.
July 9, 2009 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
They want to crash and burn, don't they? This trick, along with the firefighters, isn't probably going to go over particularly well with any groups that aren't white males.
The image is going to be this: Old white males in the Senate are obsessed with race.
July 9, 2009 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Crusty Old White Men are scared to death.
July 9, 2009 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
And who the fuck is this guy kidding. His comments regarding internment camps are troubling to say the least. His quotes at a bare minimum seem to accept an unconstitutional act let alone one that was looked upon unfavorably by President and this country as whole. At a maximum his comments simply fan the flames for this reaction.
As for affirmative action, has he looked at Congress lately, last time I checked it was mostly a all white male club, where is the affirmative action in that club? Has he looked at our prison systems mainly made up of minorities, where is the affirmative action in that club!
July 9, 2009 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
They don't care. You're missing the whole point of this exercise. Does anyone believe there's a single Senate vote that is not already decided? The whole purpose of this is to play to an ever-shrinking and ever more paranoid base.
July 9, 2009 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought we were all Iranians now. I am very confused
July 9, 2009 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
No we are all Georgians, buy we just signed a deal with Russia so that makes things complicated too. Man complex things make my brain hurt, maybe I should do what this guy does and not think before I speak.
July 9, 2009 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a surprise -- Bush appointed someone to head the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights who is fundamentally opposed to the concept of civil rights.
July 9, 2009 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Folks, I realize I may be swimming against the current here, but on the internment-camps thing, I actually think Kirsanow is right: If there were another terror attack by Arabs/Muslims, does anyone seriously doubt that there would be PUBLIC DEMAND for internment camps?
Because that's what he's saying. He's not saying we should have them. He's not saying we're going to have them. He's saying that if, say, al-Qaeda successfully carried out another terror attack, the PUBLIC WOULD DEMAND internment camps.
And I see no reason in the world to doubt that. There already have been such demands since 9/11, albeit not from a broad base of the public.
July 9, 2009 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
You Ask, "does anyone seriously doubt that there would be PUBLIC DEMAND for internment camps?"
Yes, I would not demand that all Muslim Americans be placed in internment camps. I am sure some in America would, as evidence by the polling regarding whether American should use torture to confessions from terrorist. Something tells me that all Americans who have family members who are of Muslim or middle-eastern descent would have a problem with it. Something tells me Obama would have a problem with and something tells me that the ACLU would have a serious problem let alone our judicial system. See the foundation of our country is that it is a nation of laws and we just don't go violating our laws or treaties just because the public demands it, of course our former POTUS probably did this but that still does not make it right.
I have never seen you post here before so I will take your comment as discourse but let me make it clear that internment camps were wrong during WWII and would be wrong now. Whether the public demand it is not a relevant point and one which IMHO do not think helps the conversation.
July 9, 2009 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
JQ, a few thoughts:
-- Whether you've ever seen me post here before is irrelevant. That said, I've been posting here for years, although I don't do it every day or even every week. (I've got my own blog to look after.)
-- My main point, again, is that I think people here are criticizing Kirsanow for saying something that he did not, in fact, say.
Again, Kirsanow is not arguing that the government SHOULD or WOULD set up internment camps. (And although it ought to go without saying, let me take this opportunity to say explicitly that I think it would be illegal and unconstitutional, as well as morally wrong, to do so.) He's saying that a lot of Americans would CALL for it.
-- CT Voter, you believe that wouldn't happen, that most Americans wouldn't do that. I wish I were as optimistic as you. But I live in the state that sent Jesse Helms to the Senate for 30 years, so I'm just not. I'd be delighted to be wrong.
July 9, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I don't think we'd have a public outcry for internment camps. Yes, I think hate crimes against Arab appearing individuals would rise, yet again, but I don't think the American public is as bigoted or hateful as the gentleman (or you) seem to think it is.
July 9, 2009 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The right loves him since he is a African American Russian Jew who says things like this. Plus he has that evil villain mustache.
He is an attorney, like me, here in Cleveland, Ohio and when he came back from his stint in the Bush administration his firm ran a welcome back ad in the bar journal with his picture, and what do you know pretty soon a photoshoped version is making the rounds by e-mail making fun of his mustache.
July 9, 2009 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is a breaking story about Cheney and the CIA
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/09/was-the-cia-hiding-cheney_n_228864.html
July 9, 2009 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink