Obama: The Status Quo Is Actually A Bank-Breaking Alternative Plan
President Obama seemed to have one goal tonight: change the framing of the debate on the hill. He spoke of fractions--one-third of the cost, two thirds of the cost--instead of absolute numbers, which rise into the hundreds of billions. He spoke, as he has in days past, of "health insurance reform" instead of "health care reform." And, most crucially, he spoke of the status quo as an 'alternative plan' that will double health care costs over 10 years.
That interpretation was perhaps cribbed from the Washington Post's Stephen Pearlstein, whom Obama cited in his interview with Post editorial page editor Fred Hiatt. But it's a critical point--both politically and substantively--when critics of reform insist that the Democratic plans are too expensive.


















Doing nothing is a policy choice
Kleefeld RULZ
July 22, 2009 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cribbed from Pearlstein? NOT
Kleefeld learned that in pol sci class
July 22, 2009 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
This framing of the status quo as an alternative came, directly or indirectly, from Cass Sunstein. Anybody who has read "Nudge" or Sunstein's other works can see the fingerprints of behavioral psychology here.
Not that there anything wrong with that of course. Just a very good strategy.
July 22, 2009 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lindblom, Woodhouse
Policy Making Process, The (3rd Edition) (Prentice-Hall Foundations of Modern Political Science Series) (Paperback)
July 22, 2009 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anybody actually said Obama's or The House's plan is good?
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/21/as_obama_continues_push_for_healthcare
July 22, 2009 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink