TPMDC
« Sestak Spokesman Responds To Rendell: "People Are Looking For Leaders Of Conviction, Not Convenience" | Home | Obama's Health Care Events For The Day »

Poll: Obama's Ratings Fall, In Net Negative Territory On Economy And Health Care

A new USA Today/Gallup poll suggests that President Obama's ratings could be taking a hit on some key issues.

Obama's overall approval rating is 55%, with 41% disapproval. That might sound solid enough, but in fact it puts him 10th among the 12 post-World War II presidents at the equivalent point in the term.

On the economy, his approval is 47%, with 49% disapproval, down from a 55%-42% rating in May. On health care policy, he is at 44%-50%, another upside-down rating.

In addition, 59% say his proposals involve too much spending, and 52% say the proposals call for too much expansion of government power.


95 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

this country, i swear.

user-pic

I'd say his numbers are rather strong for everything that's been going on. He inherited two ongoing endless wars, the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and he has an entire news network aimed at destroying his presidency. He has a lot of work still left to do, but it's not like he walked in to a turn key operation or anything.

user-pic

Speaking of New Corp.

I'm getting the impression Rupurt Murdock enjoys meddling in politics of other countries. He's meddled in British politics for decades now. He's currently trying to meddle in Italian by attacking Berlusconi. Australian politics is under his control. And now, via Fox, WSJ, New York Post and over in GB and Ireland, the Sun and The Irish Sun and the Times.

He uses these publications to attack people and make it seem as though there is a consensus when in fact there is none. But of course, when people get bombarded by articles from around the world they get the impression there is a consensus.

The guy is a parasite.

user-pic

Yes and we are to trust USA/GALLUP. This is media manipulation of the public. Who are they polling.

I don't believe it for a minute. Remember all the polls during the campaign. You would swear Obama was going to lose bigtime.

Don't listen to these folks and after tomorrow evening, you are going to see a different result.

user-pic

The economy is in bad shape so his approval rating will inevitably take a hit. He should continue what he is doing. This poll is not the end all and be all. First, we have to look at the sample. Remember that poll that said that now more Americans consider themselves pro-life but it turned out that Republicans were oversampled. I wouldn't be too freaked about this. This maybe the case that Republicans were oversampled.

user-pic

Still a better prez than the last guy.

user-pic

It's sad to say, but "it's the economy, stupid". The best hope we have going for us is that the economy is almost certainly going to rebound to decent health within Obama's first term.

user-pic

I'm sooo worried about this. NOT. Reagan's poll numbers were in the low 40s for two years before he won 49 of 50 states.

When healthcare passes (and it will) and the economy rebounds (and it will) Obama's numbers will move back up.

But even if his numbers are up next summer, the midterms will make Congress too scared to try anything big. Clinton was still pushing the healthcare plan in September, 1994 helped give the republicans control.

user-pic

Why care?
He would have greater negotiating leverage if the approval rate for the health care bill was much higher.

user-pic

This is what it is. Obama is not up for reelection next year but congress is. They pass healthcare to save themselves.

In 1994, Dems tried to save themselves by running against Clinton and got wiped out. Maybe they learned something.

user-pic

"In 1994, Dems tried to save themselves by running against Clinton and got wiped out. Maybe they learned something."
lol, most people can't even remember what happened yesterday.

user-pic

hey Free Rider. Good to see you. you are one of my faves.

user-pic

This "poll" really doesn't tell you anything.

Perhaps folks disapprove of Obama on health care because he's not liberal enough.

I want single payer, or at the very least, a strong public option. I'd prefer to have my health care dollars going to health care not health insurance.

So, if they'd asked me, I would have said I "disapprove" of his performance, but that doesn't mean I'm on the side of the do-nothing Republicans.

user-pic

You want single payer, therefore this poll--which anyone who'd been following, oh, anything involving politics for the last ten years--would interpret as probably meaning that the Republican and big bidness fearmongering is having an effect-- may mean that people disagree with him because they agree with you?

Alrighty, then.

user-pic

I'm wondering. If insurance companies end up going out of business because of a public option what would be the likelyhood that it would "evolve" into single-payer?

user-pic
You want single payer, therefore this poll--which anyone who'd been following, oh, anything involving politics for the last ten years--would interpret as probably meaning that the Republican and big bidness fearmongering is having an effect-- may mean that people disagree with him because they agree with you?

Alrighty, then.

huh??

point is: approve/disapprove alone doesn't tell you WHO is disapproving or WHY unless you dig a bit deeper into the data.

not that complicated.

it certainly is possible for liberals to disapprove of the president for not doing enough while at the same time conservatives disapprove of the president for doing too much.

user-pic

although to be sure the part about "59% say his proposals involve too much spending, and 52% say the proposals call for too much expansion of government power" IS the deeper into the deatils that clarifies the WHO and WHY.

user-pic

The interesting part there is that President Obama has not proposed anything. He has ask Congress to present him with a plan that is revenue neutral and expands healthcare to all.

user-pic

of course. poll respondents, like voters, aren't required to be accurately informed.

but please, let's not pretend that the executive branch's role in policy is simply to sign or not sign whatever bills the legislative branch happens to send to it.

while it may be true in a narrow and very literal sense that 'the president hasn't proposed anything' it isn't functionally accurate as a talking point.

user-pic

please don't read into my words anything more than I've stated

user-pic

sorry.

you're right.

you didn't say, 'the president hasn't proposed anything.'

you said, 'President Obama has not proposed anything.'

didn't mean to put those words into your mouth.

user-pic

I would have to assume they are polling about proposals that are on the table. You cannot open a poll question to a universe of answers.

user-pic

I completely agree that some parsing is required to interpret the approval ratings.

Also, I guess since I'm in my late 20's and used to the countries post-Reagan polarization, I don't see 50% as significant. 54%, yeah, that counts, IMHO. Depending on the state space, as you pointed out, the numbers may be weighted low.

user-pic

ditto.

Why are we pussy-footing around with this byzantine workaround "public option."

It would be cheaper and faster to have medicare for all.

This OECD study shows (see top graph on page 13) that the U.S. government already pays out more money, per capita, in health care expenditures than any other country, except Norway.

We are already paying enough for health care - we just aren't getting it.

22,000 people will die this year because of inadequate health care this year - that's 7 times the number who died at Pearl Harbor or on 9/11. The same next year. Yet, they all paid enough to get health care, they just didn't get it.

The OECD study suggest that if we adopted France's system, our out lays would go done - meaning we could all get a tax cut.

Why are we pussying-footing around with "Public Option". Just cover everyone, but leave people the option to keep their current system. It would be redundant, but they can have it if they want. The rest of us can have our health care benefits monetized and rolled into our paychecks. The resulting increase in purchasing power will increase aggregate demand and help walk us out of the current economic depression.

Lower taxes, universal health care, better economy - what's not to love about this?

user-pic

Thank you for this point.

user-pic

While I certainly am in agreement with your views and response here, the following quote would suggest we're in the vast minority of dissatisfied people:

In addition, 59% say his proposals involve too much spending, and 52% say the proposals call for too much expansion of government power.

Basically, America has its head up its ass and conservatives have better propaganda machines.

user-pic

right.

user-pic

I thought TPM posters were smarter than to fall for this stuff. Polls smolls. It means nothing. This is media spin. They need something to talk about.

I feel the same about the polls that say the public is concerned about spending. What public? If you ask the majority of the voters who voted for Obama they would tell you he's not spending enough. The average person is not focused on the deficit or deficit spending. They are trying to survive and would welcome any spending that helped their livelihoods.

Stop feeding us crap.

user-pic

that's the exact argument I'm making on the Boston Globe site. And if you read between the lines on the Wash. Post poll of a few days ago, there is evidence it's true. However, this Gallup poll has me slightly worried because of the part about more than 50% concerned Obama's plan has too much government control; that's worrisome, since more government control is what is needed to control costs and the GOP propoganda barrage may be making some unfortunate headway there.

user-pic

The economic numbers make some sort of sense; he was never gonna get any two-year grace period. But for God's sake ... do the jackasses in this country LIKE what the GOP does to them in concert with the insurance companies? And 'too much spending'? In other words, a majority believes the bullshit that the deficit = the economy, an equation that ALWAYS favors the rich and the corporations.

user-pic

Does this mean the Republicans won the spin war?

Does it really matter?

I don't think so. The results will speak for themselves once the economy turns around and more American's are covered.

user-pic

If you think Obama's poll numbers are bad (which they are not) you should look at what the public thinks of the republicans. They are at about 35%

user-pic

Without the details of who did the poll, what questions did they ask, how did they contact, who did they contact, etc. you can't possibly know what the results of the poll mean. Consider the source is still a good method.

user-pic

I guess it is safe to say the honeymoon is over. This was probably inevitable, the economy is still in bad shape because of the Republicans, but Obama is starting to "own" it in an impatient public's mind anyway.

Right leaning former supporters are hearing the daily drumbeat of "he's a big spender" and aren't seeing much improvement in the economy yet to get them out of their "government spending is bad" mindset.

Meanwhile I would not be surprised if there is some softening of support from those on the left as well due to criticism from Krugman, etc. that he is not spending enough.

user-pic

Gee, who would have guessed that trying to accommodate a party with 23% affiliation would result in a drop in your own approval. Time to jettison the Party of 'Ho, I mean No, and do what the Progressives have been suggesting for, oh, EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

user-pic

Left wing talking point: Obama is trying to accommodate the Republicans.

Complete bullshit.

user-pic

Also, I think it should be pointed out that, just as was the case during the campaign, Obama is not focused on day-to-day fluctuations in the polls. He is focused like a laser on the long-term. And in the long-term Healthcare reform with a robust public option and stimulus spending that improves the economy will make him a very popular President and help the Democratic Party to further gains in the coming years.

user-pic

Remember the infamous USA Today poll that had McCain winning by an enormous margin?

Oh yeah, that's the stuff: http://www.pollster.com/blogs/us_mccain_54_obama_44_usatoday.php

Of course, the shittiness of a poll is directly proportional to the amount of media coverage it receives.

user-pic

I remember that poll.

user-pic

When did TPM turn into Concern Troll Central?

user-pic

It's always been concern troll central.

user-pic

God, TPM has been unreadable lately.

user-pic

You can't make everyone happy on this bill.

You can't make the budget hawks (wherever they were, during the last eight years) happy by refusing to consider union-negotiated health plans for taxation as income.

You can't make the doctors happy by using a public option to beat them down to somewhere around 80% of the Medicare payout for an equivalent course of treatment.

You can't make the insurance companies happy by finally introducing real competition into markets that have largely grown used to monopolization and collusion between providers.

Screw the polls. This is why you're here, Obama. Once you've delivered the object example, the spin won't cut much ice with the 40 million people who will receive minimal health coverage for possibly the first time in their lives, and many other insured persons whose ability to choose between a public and private options will force the private providers to do much more to retain business. Those people may not vote as Democrats, but I guarantee that they will be sensitive to any future moves to destroy or hollow out this program so that somebody making $250,000 or more can pay 2-3% fewer taxes. Those who come after this program with an ax will find themselves run out of office by mobs carrying pitchforks and torches.

user-pic

A case of Statistical Distortion? Of the 1006 adults polled, how many are unemployed, uninsured, never-insured, and unsatisfied with current insurance?

user-pic

The biggest problem I have with the Health Insurance industry is that they have become enablers of the waist and outrageously high fees charged by the health care industry. They are but the tip of the iceberg as it were.

The health care industry needs to be gotten under control. Maybe even first. It has simply become another money watering hole.

C

user-pic

I'm the most politically active person in my pretty wide social circle. I've NEVER been polled, nor has anyone that I know been polled. What I do know is that controversial polls sell newspapers and soap during the TV news hour. If this poll said what so many polls said just 2 weeks ago, that the American people want healthcare reform at better than 70%, then we wouldn't have been talking about this poll, nor using the words "USA Today" today???

user-pic

"I've NEVER been polled, nor has anyone that I know been polled."

meaningless data.

user-pic

Me neither except for Polling Point which is an online poll. No one has ever called me and I am certainly politically active.

user-pic

Seriously, the manner in which the poll is conducted is essential to understanding the results.

If you ask people "do you want the government to spend money on health care for illegal immigrants?" you will get very low numbers in favor.

If you ask people "would you deny health care to an illegal immigrant?" you will see those same people suddenly change their minds.

user-pic

Political capital is a lot like financial capital -- when you use it, it decreases. But depending on how you invest it, it could provide big returns on the future, or it could just be completely depleted.

I think Obama is investing it like a long-term investor. He's using up his capital now in order to make big returns in the future.

Either way, if he just sits on that capital and does nothing, it will be subject to the laws of entropy and just decay in and of its own accord.

In other words: Use it or Lose it.

user-pic

USA Today/Gallup polls are meaningless. The only poll that means anything is the one taken on the first Tuesday in November. As I recall President Obama won that one in a landslide.

user-pic

remember, there is a bias against science and reason in this country. The lobbyists and their associated shills(US congress) use marketing and fear to disinform the Citizenry. Statiscical lying is one of their principal tools. See Lying with Statistics....http://www.physics.smu.edu/~pseudo/LieStat/

user-pic

He's spending political capital to get something done.

user-pic

How do you change the argument away from the current mythology of too high taxes and too much gov'ment?

Ask retired people to give up Social Security and Medicare. I'll bet there would be some push back. Whoa, I thought they didn't like socialized medicine.

user-pic

The poll was taken Fri 7/17 to Sun 7/19.

The period immediately after Emendorf of CBO fame testimony (Thursday 7/16).

AND comes at the tail end of weeks of fear mongering by the Party of No.

AND is about a bill that is about 60% complete.

AND comes right before Barack starts his big two-week push after letting the congresscritters hash it out in their corporate-owned committees.

This poll has ZERO value.

TPM has no business in sensationalizing these statistics.

user-pic

Wow...I guess even TPM isn't immune from the pathetically predictable "Obama is Failing!" meme that the corporate media is running with.

It's a shame, I really thought better of this outlet. But the last few days have been weak.

The "Obama Wavers on Deadline" lead was left up for the entire weekend, when it was obviously misleading and inflamatory. Yesterday there were some soft updates, and today they jump on the 'chicken little' bandwagon.

Come on TPM, what's the deal?

user-pic

so... obama's popularity is actually UP??

user-pic

THis is good news. Maybe Obama will start to pay attention to the fact that leaving a bill to Max Baucus is a bad idea because he is a little scumbag, collecting massive contributions from the industry he's trying to modify.

It's far and away time for the health policy people in HHS to come out and, with the political people inside the White House, demand a meaningful change. Sitting back and letting Congress do it isn't a viable answer. They're very unwilling to offend an industry that makes billions off of people's sicknesses.

user-pic

Word. Like most congresscritters Baucus should not be left without adult supervision.

user-pic

this looks like an outlier. gallup just had him at 61% yesterday. I don't think this means much, and the questions, as usual, sound irrelevant to actual current events.

"spending too much" - on what? he's getting bad marks on economics here, and that is deserved. high unemployment affects a lot of people, and he doesn't really appear to be doing much about it. that will lose you a lot of love, really fast. especially when you see how the whole bailout process played out. a bunch of crooks were handed hundreds of billions of dollars, no strings attached, and now they're making record profits again off of the suffering of the rest of the country. Obama tried to reel them in, cap their pay, attach conditions, etc and it failed. that looks bad.

as far as on health care, I tend to think this means that people haven't seen him fighting hard enough FOR it so far. he refused to negotiate hard, refused to draw lines in the sand. this is something people are losing their lives and limbs and houses over, and bout 80% of the public wants a real, actual health care system like every other grown-up country has. and it looks very much like we're not going to get that, so some anger is deserved here as well.

these silly polls will be used, no doubt, to argue that Obama has been "too far left" and other such nonsense. really, I think people want to see this guy keep his promises and fight for the things he said up and down he'd fight for. he has done some good things thus far, yes, but he's blown some of the really important stuff. people like him, but if he keeps being ineffective and wallflowerish, people will turn on him. I hope he gets some fire in his belly and starts fighting against these idiot blue dogs in Congress.

user-pic

Of course, I don't want to see Obama's rating drop. I voted for him. Two things come to mind. First, USAToday and Gallup have tended away from him going way back, and second, when you're in the game, you get dinged. Look at all the contentious issues Obama has been involved in. The fiscal crisis, health care, Sotomayer, Afghanistan. Sure, you can keep your ratings up if you don't attempt anything, but if that were the case, why take the job?

user-pic

The poll suggests that the steepest drop came from conservative and moderate Democrats. Well, isn't that peachy. I was hoping that with the election of Obama and Democratic majorities the Democratic Party would recover it's long, lost progressive soul. Apparently, that's not going to happen. We now have three disparate factions (liberal, moderate & conservative) of the Democratic Party, each pushing its own platform.

All going against a singular, coordinated, single-minded, obstreperous Republican Party.

Guess who's going to win?

user-pic

People can disapprove of what Obama is doing wrt health care because they think he's doing too much or because they think he's doing too little. It's hard to say. And without that information, these numbers don't really tell us too much.

As for everyone carping about TPMDC publishing these results? They post poll results all the time. Just because you don't happen to like the actual results isn't reason to accuse TPM of turning into Drudge-lite.

A little perspective, people.

user-pic

A case of Statistical Distortion? Of the 1006 adults polled, how many are unemployed, uninsured, never-insured, and unsatisfied with current insurance?

user-pic

This disapproval comes from a bunch of angry Single Payer folks. We want it ON THE TABLE. We want the insurance cos out!

user-pic

Right. That must be it. Just like the Republicans lost Congress because they weren't conservative enough.

user-pic

I must disagree with you on this. It is likely at least equal parts the lefties and the propagandised bedwetters causing the drop.

user-pic
59% say his proposals involve too much spending, and 52% say the proposals call for too much expansion of government power.

Reading is Fundamental!

user-pic

President Obama has proposed nothing, the plans being discussed are congressional plans, the poll asks a false question.

user-pic

that's fine as far it goes, but it doesn't make radhika's claim any more true.

user-pic

Reading is fundamental! Twice you have placed words in my mouth. The 59% and 52% have nothing to do with Obama's proposals. Obama's healthcare goals are to "reduce costs," "guarantee choice" and "ensure affordable, quality care for all" and be "deficit neutral". These are goals not proposals.

user-pic

and STILL your 'point' (again, fine, as far as it goes - not far, see below*) doesn't make Radhika's point any more true or my point any less so.


*and the 59% and 52% numbers about 'his proposals' were not specifically in reference to health care. they were in reference to 'his proposals' in general as head of the executive branch. NOT a 'false question'. but one that refutes any claim that obama's approval slippage is from people who want single payer.

user-pic

and how does "that's fine as far it goes, but it doesn't make radhika's claim any more true," place words in your mouth???

user-pic

I'm not in disagreement with anyone as far as there critiques of the poll. In fact, I agree. The poll asks a question with a bipolar view. The only positives you can expect are centrists. The more polarizing the issue, the less responses of approval.
My problem is of a different nature, they ask a false question; They ask about Obama's proposal, There is no Obama proposal,only Congressional proposals.
The poll is less than meaningless.

user-pic

It's harmful!

user-pic

While you never want to see your numbers drop quickly - and I'm not shocked given the economy - there is a silver lining in a lot of these polls. You can see it in the recent WaPo poll that had Obama's numbers dipping pretty significantly both overall and on particular issues. People are losing faith and patience in Obama but it is not translating into improved numbers for the Republicans. In the WaPo poll, he still had something like a 20+ advantage over the GOP on things like healthcare reform, the deficit, and the economy. Dems in Congress still poll consistently better than their GOP counterparts in various polls. Being the party of "no" - ie, whining and complaining and criticizing - may help make the other guy look bad but with no ideas of your own, it doesn't make you look any better, especially when people still know and think that you - ie, the GOP and Bush - were responsible for getting us into this mess in the first place. Dem members of Congress need to note and remember this and not buy into the GOP/media spin "O my god, he's failing...the GOP is coming back!" He's not failing and the GOP may not have even reached bottom yet.

user-pic

If people perceived Obama as failing and the Republicans as a viable alternative, his favorability ratings should be way down. The fact that they're consistently high says people like Obama as a leader. They're just not thrilled about how Washington is handling stuff.

user-pic

yep. these numbers really just seem to mostly reflect republican-leaning independents (and obama-leaning - if still mccain-voting - republicans) going back home. (that, and a bit of bluedog-electing dems settling in.)

user-pic

There is a pattern here dating back to the Clinton Administration: Young, energetic Democratic president takes office with big reform plans, but immediately finds he has to spend precious political capital to clean up the economic mess his GOP predecessor left behind.

With Clinton it was deficit reduction and tax increases; in Obama's case it's fiscal stimulus and bailouts (banks, autos, etc.)

In both cases, doing the dirty but necessary took a toll on presidential approval ratings. In Clinton's case, the damage, while not politically fatal to him, pretty much put paid to the Democratic Congress and any hopes for an economic program more progressive than "putting bondholders first."

It's too soon to say whether the same will happen to Obama, but you gotta admit: the Republicans have found a great electoral formula -- cut taxes, spend money and give away the regulatory store to your corporate supporters, then bash the Democrats when they try to clean up the mess.

Or, as H.L. Menken put it: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."

user-pic

Weren't two presidents who had lower approval ratings bush and Clinton? Both of whom went on to win second terms, and also the most directly comparable given how recent they are.

user-pic

It's just Reuters manufacturing dissent...
see Steve Benen
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

"WHAT THAT POST/ABC POLL DOES (AND DOES NOT) SAY.... I stopped by the Yahoo News page a few minutes ago and saw the lead headline at the top of the page that reads, "Public support slips for Obama's health plan, poll shows." It quoted a Reuters report that says:

Public support for President Barack Obama's handling of healthcare reform, the pillar of his legislative agenda, has fallen below 50 percent for the first time, a Washington Post-ABC News poll released on Monday said.

I realize the current media narrative is "public turns on health care reform," but let's clarify this a bit, because it's nearly as misleading as the political attacks that have weakened support for reform in the first place.

The Post-ABC poll asked Americans if they approve of President Obama's handling of various issues. While he enjoys majority support in some areas, 49% approve of his handling of health care, 44% do not.

But that doesn't necessarily reflect opposition to "Obama's health plan." Maybe the president's support on this issue has fallen to 49% because some Americans are disappointed Obama hasn't already pushed the bill through Congress. Maybe they don't like the way he's empowered lawmakers to take the lead in writing the bill. Who knows? The poll doesn't really tell us.

The poll does, however, tell us a few relevant details. For example, when given a choice on who Americans trust more on reforming the health care system, 54% prefer the president, while only 34% back congressional Republicans.

Even more important, when the basics of the plan are described to respondents, including Republican-friendly phrasing ("government-run"), a majority of Americans support the reform proposal. This was left out of the Reuters report altogether.

In an article about poll support for "Obama's health plan," Reuters ignored the only question in the poll about support for Obama's health plan. Odd."
—Steve Benen 4:20 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (13)

user-pic

OK, but this post wasn't about the ABC/Post poll--it was about the USA Today/Gallup poll...

user-pic

Oops!
Good catch kitty!

user-pic

Also, I just took a look at the Gallup site:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/121814/More-Disapprove-Than-Approve-Obama-Healthcare.aspx

I think Steve's sober scepticism also holds with Gallup regarding the question as to why the disapprovals have risen on O's performance on this issue:

"But that doesn't necessarily reflect opposition to "Obama's health plan." Maybe the president's support on this issue has fallen to 49% because some Americans are disappointed Obama hasn't already pushed the bill through Congress. Maybe they don't like the way he's empowered lawmakers to take the lead in writing the bill. Who knows? The poll doesn't really tell us."

The Gallup poll reflects a deep partisan split with independents virtually matching the overall numbers. It doesn't seem as if this poll asked 'why do you approve/disapprove' either.

Gallup's July 10-12 poll does reflect ABC's with regard to an overall majority favoring major healthcare reform legislation being passed this year:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/121664/Majority-Favors-Healthcare-Reform-This-Year.aspx

"PRINCETON, NJ -- As U.S. House leaders unveil a plan to reform the U.S. healthcare system, a USA Today/Gallup poll finds 56% of Americans in favor and 33% opposed to Congress' passing major healthcare reform legislation this year. Support for healthcare reform before the end of the year is sharply split along party lines, with 79% of Democrats in favor, compared with only 23% of Republicans."

dang, can't paste those charts...

So yes, job performance approval, down. Health Care reform Approval holding at over mid-50's with some slight trending decline.

While there's a relation in there (I can't even begin to crunch like that). We've just got to be careful not to conflate the two.

peace

user-pic

I'd prefer them to be trending up, but I just don't see any of these numbers as dire. Given the economy, I'm surprised they actually aren't lower.

user-pic

They are going to trend up - watch after his prime time news conference tomorrow night 8PM EST

user-pic

Well guys...what has the man done that hasn't been a total screw-up?

user-pic

I don't know you tell me.

user-pic

Go ask someone who cares about what you think you troll. GTFOOH because you are making the place stink .

user-pic

This poll was taken when every news channel and headline was suggesting that Obama's health plan may fail getting through Congress. It won't.

user-pic

This is what happens when the only people with the most power to get the messages across are against you.

user-pic

So what this poll is telling me that Obama's dealing with health-care is down, polling wise. Wait I saw article after article and MSM story after story, saying that Obama has not been out front enough and telling Congress and the American people what he wants the bill to say. Gosh this is just confusing.

By the way the executive branch executes the laws and it is Congress job to legislate. If we have health-care reform it can not and should not be spearheaded by an overzealous executive, it should be buffered and supported by poll after poll over the last decade which supports the belief that most americans want health-care reform. But yet again this is an opportunity for many of the Presidents enemies both inside and outside washington to show the president their power.

You know what we should do is create regional districts of those that support health-care reform and email and call the hell out of all of Congressmen/women and local media in order to show that the public's main detractor in getting things done is Congress itself. As an American it really a little worrisome to see so much emotion directed at the President to get things done. This is a democracy, it has three branches and as I was always told, one bad apple can ruin the whole bunch. Well looking at Congress over the last couple of decades, I would say that there are definitely some bad apples in Congress against reform on any number of issues.

user-pic

Stay tuned for a prime time news conference at 8PM EST Wednesday night.

Obama knows what he' s doing.

user-pic

what people need to understand and know that the PRESIDENT cannot fix maybe not in 4 years what took 30 to 40 years to screw up..this economic mess is deeper than we know,i also remember that he said in one of his speeches that we can hope for the best,,work for the best..but know that this is not going to be an easy fix...

user-pic

Note that some of us disapprove because we want and believe in a "single payer" plan.

The strategy ought to be that if a bill is not passed by the recess the admin comes back with a single payer plan out of the break.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address