Scattered Dems Regrouping As Tensions Erupt
This story is changing so quickly, it's all but impossible to stay on top of--but here are a few key issues--cribbed from conversations and my own observations--to keep you moored.
First of all, because everything's moving so fast, just about anything's possible.
Second, it really does seem as if the Blue Dog negotiations are dead. Differences are irreconcilable and time is basically up.
Earlier today, Waxman struck a deal with rural Democrats, concerned with Medicare reimbursement rates in their districts. It's unclear whether he thought that deal meant he'd shored up enough support for the bill that he no longer needed acquiescence of the Blue Dogs on his committee, but once that deal was struck he told them, basically, to play ball or go home. So they went home.
Democrats seem to have entered regroup mode, after mixed messages flew across the Capitol. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said on the floor that a vote on a bill before recess is unlikely (though he added that the House might stay in session past next Friday if success was in reach). House Whip James Clyburn, was more hopeful, saying that all decisions would be made after Waxman and Speaker Pelosi sit down and take stock of where things stand. And within the last hour or so there's been something of a lock down on new, verifiable information as Democratic leaders figure out what to do next.


















After seeing the horse trading Waxman did to get energy passed, I am confident that he would stay there all year if he thought the Blue Dogs were negotiating in good faith OR if he thought giving in to them was the ONLY way to go.
I think Waxman has (a) concluded that the Blue Dogs are full of shit and (b) knows where he can get 218 votes without their sorry asses!
Go, Henry!!
July 24, 2009 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely! Are Blue Dogs the same thing as Blue Balls?
July 24, 2009 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sigh. This is another one of those Mr. Dooley moments: “Th' dimmycratic party aint on speakin' terms with itsilf."
July 24, 2009 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Though, you know, I notice that asshole Ross is the only one we've actually heard from. I can't help wondering how many members he really speaks for besides himself.
July 24, 2009 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't help but think the House is thinking of ways to peel away from Ross as many members as possible before the "real" votes.
July 24, 2009 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Waxman goes through with his threat, which I think he should, won't the GOP be in a tizzy!!
July 24, 2009 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
It looks for all the world like Waxman has concluded that the the Blue Dogs are sandbagging.
July 24, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like the public is tired of watching the Democratic Congress make sausage
Gallup:
July 24, 2009 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
A plurality still says "pass this year"
July 24, 2009 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course had the question been prefaced to the effect "if hcr doesn't pass this year, it isn't likely to pass next year or any time during the next 10-20 years..." the result would have been 70-24
That of course is the reality
My only point is that folks may be getting sick of watching the Congress trying to do the job they were hired to do.
The corollary is that if the Dems do not pass it now by next year it will have become clear that there is no next year, and the Democrats will have a 70% pissed off problem on this issue and probably half a dozen more
July 24, 2009 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Pass, not necessarily this year" is not a real option.
That is the problem. The real choices are "Pass it this year" or "Don't pass it"
July 24, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The House leaders reached a deal on Medicare payments: A "Pay for Value" reimbursement system that rewards doctors and hospitals that achieve the best outcomes at the lowest cost.
As a result, The House gained a lot of votes, a lot of people who were withholding support.
The federal Medicare program insures some 44 million elderly and disabled Americans at an annual cost of $450 billion, almost one-fifth of total U.S. health care spending.
Supporters of the agreement say it could save the Medicare System more than $100 billion a year and improve care, that means $1trillian over a decade.
No one can disagree with this best outcome / evidence-based system, and private insurance, too, will be greatly influenced by this change with the focus on value over volume.
THANK YOU !
July 25, 2009 1:56 AM | Reply | Permalink