TPMDC
« HELP Committee Circulates Health Care Legislation--Public Option And All | Home | Busby Campaign, Supporters And Allies Publicly Mobilize Against Sheriff's Raid »

WaPo Does Damage Control After Cash-For-Access Scheme Leaks

This morning, Politico published a story detailing an interesting flier apparently being passed around DC health care lobby circles: a dinner invitation from the Washington Post at the house of CEO and Publisher Katherine Weymouth, selling access to its news and editorial staff and top Obama officials for $25,000 to $250,000. A health care lobbyist passed the missive on to Politico staff because he felt "it's a conflict of interest for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its 'health care reporting and editorial staff.'"

Two and a half hours after the story was published, executive editor Marcus Brauchli sent an internal memo entitled "Newsroom Independence," in which he stated that the news department will not be attending the dinner. The sentiment echoes the statement WaPo spokesperson Kris Coratti made to Politico:

The flier circulated this morning came out of a business division for conferences and events, and the newsroom was unaware of such communication. It went out before it was properly vetted, and this draft does not represent what the company's vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers.

As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this.

Read the full text of Brauchli's memo and the original flier after the jump.

From: Marcus Brauchli
Sent: 07/02/2009 10:33 AM EDT
To: NEWS
Subject: Newsroom Independence

Colleagues,

A flyer was distributed this week offering an "underwriting opportunity" for a dinner on health-care reform, in which the news department had been asked to participate.

The language in the flyer and the description of the event preclude our participation.

We will not participate in events where promises are made that in exchange for money The Post will offer access to newsroom personnel or will refrain from confrontational questioning. Our independence from advertisers or sponsors is inviolable.

There is a long tradition of news organizations hosting conferences and events, and we believe The Post, including the newsroom, can do these things in ways that are consistent with our values.

Marcus

The original flyer:

"Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate," says the one-page flier. "Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth ... Bring your organization's CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama Administration and Congressional leaders ...

"Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama Administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typically on the guest list of 20 or less. ...

"Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters' CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 ... Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. ... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m."

Late Update:: Katherine Weymouth has announced that the dinners are completely canceled. Weymouth said, "This should never have happened. The fliers got out and weren't vetted. They didn't represent at all what we were attempting to do. We're not going to do any dinners that would impugn the integrity of the newsroom."


28 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Ok, so the newsroom won't attend. What about the editorial staff?

The Post isn't helping with these statements. The statement should be: these events will not be held by the Post, period.

We're supposed to think it's A-OK for lobbyists to pay for access to the editorial staff, just as long as the newsroom isn't involved?

And how dare the Post say that administration officials are involved with this?

Seems like it's obviously time for a bloggers ethics panel.

user-pic

Yeah, something is fishy here. If admin officials are attending a dinner with the "media" (WaPo) how are they supposed to know who else is on the guest list?

It makes me wonder if the lobbyist leaker of this memo is trying to blacken the Obama administration by exposing WaPo as corrupt and trying to connect Admin Officials by association.

user-pic

How is The Post guaranteeing access to government officials for a price? This would seem to me to be the bigger story.

user-pic

Washington folks love to go to swanky dinners. Give free food and you can pretty much guarantee you will have somebody in the room. Elected officials have a lot of staff to feed!

user-pic

This is disgraceful.

user-pic

Amen. The Washington Post is committing suicide. I thought the never-ending parade of Neocon lunatics on its op-ed pages was bad but this . . .

user-pic

...and disgusting.

user-pic

Confirms some of my worst fears about the press and how little they can be trusted.

If I ever read the WaPo again I will not trust the veracity of a single thing they say. Nothing more than propagandists/pitchmen for corporate interests no longer reporting facts.

user-pic

second.

user-pic

"An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. ... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m." Who are the few?

user-pic

According to Politico:"Weymouth and Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli both said they were not aware of the flier." Not the flier, just the event, and the fact that the Post pimps politicians for lobbyists and has their editorial slant and reporting for sale.

Obviously it's in the public interest for anyone reading the Post to know this goes on: so I assume the Post newsroom will jump right on this story and dig deep. Who knew and when did they know?

user-pic

This makes me ill. I canceled my home delivery of the Post a year ago (after receiving it for over 30 years) over their politics. Last night I got call asking if I wanted some free coupons the Post was promoting and I told them sure, fire Fred Hiatt and I'll participate, otherwise go take a jump in the lake.

user-pic

Versha, I think army193 and fdeaton's questions above bear a closer look:

-Which Obama administration officials involved?
-Did they know about the Post's pay to play scheme?
-How did the Post intend to deliver the officials to the scumbags, I mean lobbyists?

user-pic

Exactly the right questions.

Cozy deal for everyone: access for lobbyists, cash for the Post and bankable karma for the administration officials, who surely could consider the Post in their corner, having netted them...how much $$?

user-pic

According to NPR at 5pm, Obama administration people had received invitations, but none had accepted.

user-pic

Sounds like its time to re-regulate the media. Deregulation's brought us consolidation and now newspaper coverage that is basically advertisement in the guise of reporting. Spectacular.

user-pic

Note to WaPo and other assorted corporate media (Minnesota/Twin Cities papers, I'm lookin' at you, too):

This is why I place my trust in the blogosphere as a source for my news.

BUT! BUT! BUT! You say! A blog doesn't have EDITORS! It doesn't have REAL REPORTERS!

Tell ya what, corporate media - I promise to start looking elsewhere for my news the moment I find out that Josh Marshall is charging $25K-$250K for access to TPM's writers!

user-pic

Can I start taking up a collection so that I don't have to talk to:

Charles Krauthammer
David Broder
George Will
Kathleen Parker
William Kristol

or today's guest editorial writer, John Bolton (opining that maybe it's time for Israel to start a war with Iran?).

user-pic

Seems like an awful lot of significant detail -- prices, tiers of access, even package deals -- to have been simply concocted by the business division without any help or encouragement from anyone else. I'll reserve judgment I guess, but really, this is pretty extraordinary.

user-pic

Well, they've changed their minds.

So we can trust them again now, right? Right?

[crickets, I hope]

user-pic

If it's in print, then it must be true! For sure!

user-pic

It turns out Administration officials were invited, but did not RSVP. Gibbs (if he's to be believed) says they probably would not have attended anyway bc of ethics issues. You think?!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/02/white-house-acknowledges_n_225056.html

user-pic

I am sorry to say that I believe they are lying. Emmanuel, Geithner, Bernanke and Petraeus, just for starters, attended the Atlantic salons which were also pay-to-play operations and which Howie Kurtz himself wrote admiringly about in the Washington Post without disclosing that the events were corporate-sponsored.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/26/AR2009042602297_2.html?sid=ST2009042602321

I am also getting indications that the reporters themselves may get paid stipends to attend these corporate-sponsored events.

For example, reporters attending The Atlantic corporate-sponsored dinners included David Brooks and Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, Gene Robinson and Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post, NBC's David Gregory, ABC's George Stephanopoulos, PBS's Gwen Ifill, the New Yorker's Jane Mayer, Vanity Fair's Todd Purdum, former Time managing editor Walter Isaacson and staffers from Bradley's Atlantic and National Journal, including Ron Brownstein, Andrew Sullivan and Jonathan Rauch.

user-pic

I have to agree that they are lying.

People need to wake up to the reality that the village is an incestuous and extraorindarily corrupt place. Washington in general needs to be cleaned out top to bottom and I'm talking about most of the people who populate the elite strata regardless of party and other affiliations. It is time for a genuine and thorough anti-Washington movement. The corruption, greed and just plain bad judgment is over the top and they are acting like business as usual is okay. It is not.

user-pic

I'm sorry to read that Obama officials were going to paricipate.

user-pic

I am delighted to see this story emerge as it casts the WAO in the proper light and a light they cannot escape. The official statement is pure bullshit. Of course what the flier indicated is exactly what was intended. What was not intended is that the larger public would know about it. The WAPO is a whorehouse, not a news organization and the sooner that is made clear the better!

user-pic

I hate to say it after years of reading and respecting the Post, but the paper (at least in its current guise) has no more reason to exist. The Washington Times already has the wingnut market covered, and the balance of the Washington press corps covers itself well enough without the Post. Egocentric pols get all the face time they need through the 24-hour teevee cycle, and local blogs cover the strictly local comings-and-goings quite sufficiently.

If the Post closed down tomorrow it would still leave a respectable legacy of (1) Watergate and (2) a fine Sousa march. Looks like it's all downhill from here, though.

user-pic

I wish Dan Froomkin were still able to comment on this as a Post insider, but alas that won't happen.

In damage control mode, the Post is now eager to suggest that they've shelved the dinners and repudiated the idea behind them, but consider what might've prevailed if the whistleblowing lobbyist (fancy that phrase!) hadn't leaked the memo to Politico. These pseudo-salons would have gone right ahead, in some form or fashion.

For a pithy commentary, see Charles Kaiser's Full Court Press blog on today's episode, "Washington Post: RIP." http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/fullcourtpress

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Matt
Cooper

Bio

Eric
Kleefeld

Bio

Brian
Beutler

Bio


Latest Videos




Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address