TPMDC

Asst. U.S. Attorney Who Took Loan from Chris Christie Resigns


Gov. Jon Corzine (D-NJ) and Former US Attorney Chris Christie (R)

Read More

NJ-GOV

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Another shoe has dropped in the New Jersey gubernatorial race. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michele Brown -- who took a $46,000 loan in 2007 from her then-boss Chris Christie, who is now the Republican nominee for Governor -- has resigned from her job in the U.S. Attorney's office, effective immediately.

"I am extraordinarily proud of all the work we have done and all the good we have accomplished on behalf of the people of this state," Brown wrote in her resignation letter. "I also know how important it is that we continue to pursue our mission, and I do not want to become a distraction from the critically important work we do."

Christie has gotten in trouble this past week over the loan, which he did not disclose in his ethics disclosure forms, and for which he did not report income from it on his taxes (though it was duly filed with a county clerk's office as a mortgage). Democrats have attacked the loan, and have also called on Brown to recuse herself from handling Freedom Of Information Act requests involving Christie's tenure at the office.

Christie has said the loan did not present any ethical problems, and was made between friends. Earlier today, he refused to end the loan, which is still being paid back in regular installments. "If she decides she wants to refinance the loan, that's always her choice," said Christie. "As long as she continues to pay the loan on a regular basis to me, that's the deal we made. It's up to (Michele)."

Late Update: Lis Smith, a campaign spokesperson for Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine, sends us this statement:

"Michele Brown's resignation today does nothing to put to rest questions about Christie's conduct both in and outside of the U.S. Attorney's office. Whether it was illegally laying the groundwork for his gubernatorial campaign from the U.S. Attorney's office with the help of Karl Rove, maintaining a secret financial relationship with the number two at the U.S. Attorney's office during his campaign, or rewarding political cronies with millions of dollars in no-bid contracts, Christie still must answer to serious legal and ethical questions. He can start by demanding the immediate release of public documents from his tenure as U.S. Attorney as requested by the Corzine campaign."

Late Late Update: Christie has released this statement:

"Michele Brown is a career prosecutor who has worked at the U.S. Attorney's office for 18 years, serving both Democratic and Republican presidents. Michele's long and distinguished record of public service is impressive, and during that time she's shown herself to be a fair and respected federal prosecutor among judges, adversaries and her peers. Her efforts have been instrumental to all the success the U.S. Attorney's office has had and her work ethic, determination and outstanding legal background will be missed by all those she has worked with over the years. I know Michele will continue to be a success at whatever she chooses for her next challenge."

Late Late Update: The Christie campaign is now trying to turn the narrative around on this story, with Christie's running mate Kim Guadagno releasing this statement blaming Corzine for smearing a good public servant:

"It is despicable that Jon Corzine has stooped so low to try to win re-election that he's aimed the negative attacks of his hired guns on a dedicated public servant who made it her life's mission to serve the people of New Jersey as a corruption-fighter. As candidates willingly running for office, we expect this kind of mudslinging, but we don't expect it to be aimed at someone who has made a career serving both Democrats and Republicans in the best interest of the public good. Jon Corzine should be ashamed that he has smeared a respected federal prosecutor's name and forced her to end an acclaimed career in the sole interest of scoring petty political points."

Join the Conversation!

21 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

August 25, 2009 5:47 PM   

But if she resigned, how is she going make those installment payments?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 6:13 PM   

Why resign if you did nothing wrong? This will just bring more attention to the problem.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 8:27 PM    in reply to jerryfatheart

Love your avatar. Mine was on my front door; is yours a personal photo of a Luna Moth?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 9:05 AM    in reply to CVille Dem

Thanks. Yes, I took this with my phone outside a reception hall in Connecticut. The moth's placidity, and its stark contrast with the wall, were striking.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 6:44 PM   

good reporting, thanks

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 6:56 PM   

Resigning only makes this look worse. I think Tubby is in real trouble.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 6:58 PM   

Why is it that Republican are always dirty?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 7:20 PM    in reply to 31tudor

republicans aren't always dirty.

but new jersey politicians are always dirty.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 8:29 PM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

No, republicans are definitely always dirty. Name one who isn't (current) -- I agree that it wasn't always so.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 7:16 PM   

Kleefelded! Gotta love it

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 7:25 PM   

"Michele Brown is a career prosecutor who has worked at the U.S. Attorney's office for 18 years, serving both Democratic and Republican presidents. Michele's long and distinguished record of public service is impressive..."

But he needed a $46000 loan? Gosh, I didn't know being a lawyer paid that badly. After 18 years, why was he in such a financial hole? And if he had a such a long record of public service, it would have been a snap to get a loan from a bank. There's something more at the bottom of this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 7:38 PM    in reply to Mooser

Uh, that "he" is a she. Which makes the loan all the more suspect. I smell a sex scandal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 8:35 PM    in reply to Mooser

Why ANY legally adept person would engage in a loan with their superior (in government) betrays a scandal of some sort. There is no innocent reason for this. Christie doesn't declare the interest he got paid? So much for the squeaky clean prosecutor.

Just one more example of republican corruption, as if we needed one more....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 9:37 PM    in reply to Mooser

Per the county records it was for a mortgage - needing to get a $46k mortgage is hardly being in financial straights.

My question is more why take out any kind of personal loan when based on the time she joined the government she should have easily have built-up a reasonably sized next egg in the Federal 401K-type employee savings/investing plan that allows you to borrow against it at a very good for the purposes of buying a house or a college education.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 9:17 PM   

I guess we are talking about something more than 20 bucks. Does anyone know an amount?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 9:19 PM   

oops 46 g's

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 10:27 PM   

The Corzine campaign is running a great ad with Christie clapping like a trained seal while his ties to Bush are recited. I wish people outside of NJ could view it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 8:49 AM   

If it's registered as a mortgage, what's the property it's on? What percentage of the property value is it? Is it the only mortgage on the property?

I'm sorry, but there's just no way in a government job that getting a loan from your boss isn't at least the appearance of a conflict of interest. Either the terms are going to be too kind, in which case it's some kind of payoff to the subordinate, or they're not, in which case it's some kind of payoff to the boss.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 11:51 AM   

Bad judgement for someone who wishes to be a senator.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 6:58 AM   

Check out http://www.obamamortgagerelief.org/ There needs to be a program for the elderly but not quite to retirement age for mortgage modification when the have lost their job during this particular recession. I made a decent wage because I put my time into a company and now have no job. I am looking at $10 - to $12 hr jobs after working all my life. You can't make a mortgage payment on that kind of money. I will eventually lose my home.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on