TPMDC

Bingaman Becomes First Member of 'Gang of Six' to Broach Go-It Alone Plan For Dems

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Sen. Jeff Binagaman (D-NM)--one of the six members of the Senate Finance Committee who have been hashing out a health care reform bill for months--says that if bipartisan negotiations go nowhere, he'd support an effort to circumvent a filibuster and pass legislation without any Republicans.

"If we are unable to do it any other way, that is an option. It is a very difficult option," Bingaman told a crowd of about 200 at a town hall event in Albuquerque yesterday. He was referring to the possibility that Democrats will pass health care reform through the so-called budget reconciliation process.

The acknowledgment signals that even those members of Congress most invested in passing bipartisan health care reform are well aware that those efforts might not bear fruit.

"I don't think that that effort [at bipartisanship] is what is stymying progress," Bingaman said.

"It may well not succeed, but it has been worth the effort, and we are continuing with it."

Bingaman spokesman Jude McCartin confirms that he's "still hopeful" that the Finance Committee will "yield a good bill."

"It would be his preference," she said.

But if the effort fails, as Bingaman acknowledged it might, key Democrats say they are prepared to include at least some reform measures in the reconciliation bill. And now we know that at least one of the members of the Senate most committed to bipartisanship would support it.

Join the Conversation!

18 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

August 25, 2009 3:24 PM   

Thank you Charles Grassley

From 70-80 votes to demanding a "perfect bill" the last act of Circus Baucus

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:32 PM   

"Bear fruit," not " bare fruit," please.

Carp, now Brian's got me imagining the Fruit of the Loom guys au naturelle ... and me just finishing lunch ...

Oops, back to topic, I agree with johnmcc: SOMEONE is certainly twisting some arms in a backroom somewhere. And about bloody time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:51 PM   

Now this story at least hints at an answer to the question you posed in your previous Schumer article.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:51 PM   

Carp, now Brian's got me imagining the Fruit of the Loom guys au naturelle

Feel my pain
http://www.facebook.com/profile/pic.php?uid=AAAAAQAQhYJxbfBbmWOqbr8sEQScFwAAAAlhwqtwArhOPbKvV5D8UQDF

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:59 PM   

Of course, the process could be "Democrat only" and not involve reconciliation - that is, if 60 senators voted for cloture on the health care bill. It's also possible you could get 1-2 Republican senators to vote for cloture, enabling 1-2 Democrats to vote no.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:08 PM   

Thank you, Senator Binagaman!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:10 PM   

"If we are unable to do it any other way, that is an option."

I'm not understanding what constitutes genuine news stories anymore. To me, this sounds like a Senator is stating the obvious--and not committing to it in the slightest.

Are we parsing for narratives?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 9:28 AM    in reply to tpmgary

Bingaman's key phrase: "It is a very difficult option."

Putting lefties on notice that it is not a gimme.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:15 PM   

60 dem votes is not feasable, Ted won't be able to make it and Byrd is iffy at best, don't even get me started on Nelson-D-Neb, and Conrad-D-ND.

If repubs really believed that the Health care would be bad for the country then they would happily vote for cloture (only) and let the bad bill hang around the Dem's neck for years to come. They have done little else but prove they are that petty.

The fact is they know that the bill will be popular as its positive effects are felt, this is why they must kill it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:41 PM    in reply to _jonny_5_

How about MAKE THE REPUBLICANS FILIBUSTER!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:21 PM   

You don't need reconciliation, you have 60 votes, but of course this is the Dems we're talking about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:43 PM   

typo alert: "bare fruit."
Someone tell that nudie fruit to get its pants on - quick!

Meanwhile, good on Bingaman.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 5:07 PM   

Leaving aside for the moment the weirdness of this curiously appointed gang of six holding health security hostage, Democratic senators sometimes seem lost in a dream world where their obligation to get things done is subservient to their obligation to accommodate people who don't want to get things done.

The election produced a mandate for health security. We gave your party the necessary votes. Work with the House and the President to make it happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 5:22 PM   

Thank God, Rahm still has 9 good fingers, for polking red coats in the chest!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 5:25 PM   

Of course the important PS to this story is the fact that Bingaman, prompted by his audience, did a show of hands poll of his audience regarding the public option -- apparently over 90% of the crowd supported it. If only the other stunkcufs in the Senate would do the same perhaps we would get to see some democracy in action.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 5:35 PM   

Right! Obama reached out in bipartisanship and Republicans spit in his hand. Passed a hefty health care bill with a muscular public option in reconciliation. This accomplishes two things:

1. It tells Republicans that we're not going to let you hold the health and well being of the American people hostage. And

2. It tells the Blue Dogs that they're either Democrats or Republicans, they can't be both. and if they're going to side with the GOP, we don't need you.

One of the things that emboldens Republicans is the fact that Democrats don't vote in lockstep. Reconciliation would take that weapon away from them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 6:10 PM   

Don't let Republicans lie and claim they never use budget reconciliation.

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/budget-reconciliation/

A list of instances where reconciliation was implemented:

Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1982
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1983
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993
Balanced Budget Act of 1995 (vetoed)
Personal Responsibility and Budget Reconciliation Act of 1996
Balanced Budget Act of 1997
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
Taxpayer Refund and Relief Act of 1999 (vetoed)
Marriage Tax Relief Act of 2000 (vetoed)
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001
Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005

And Republicans and Democrats passed a great deal of policy through budget reconciliation.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017864.ph p

Whether reducing or increasing deficits, many of the reconciliation bills made major changes in policy. Health insurance portability (COBRA), nursing home standards, expanded Medicaid eligibility, increases in the earned income tax credit, welfare reform, the state Children’s Health Insurance Program, major tax cuts and student aid reform were all enacted under reconciliation procedures. Health reform 2009 style would be the most ambitious use of reconciliation but it fits a pattern used over three decades by both parties to avoid the strictures of Senate filibusters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 1:58 AM   

Good careful but a warning statement. Either play or get out of the freaking sandbox.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!