Here's another fun detail from last night's Americans For Prosperity teletown hall, which featured Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN). Both politicians said that if a health care bill passes, it should be actively fought and resisted through a collective effort of conservative governors.
A caller asked DeMint what the states could do in order to stop unconstitutional action by the federal government on health care. DeMint replied, "I think the key to pushing back against the federal government is some governors and state legislators who champion individual freedom."
DeMint said he would love to see states go to court to invoke the Tenth Amendment: "If we had some states come together and say the only way to save this country is to push back." He also added: "I think you'll see some states say no more, we're not going down with the federal government."
A few minutes later, Bachmann commented on this possibility as well, noting that the efforts of some Republican governors to reject stimulus money failed in large part because they were too isolated from one another. A collective action, on the other hand, would stand a much greater chance of success.
"We'd have to see some fairly revolutionary action taken by the these states, and it's question of whether these governors would do that," said Bachmann. She added that she doesn't want to see it actually come to that -- the key is for conservatives to organize now and stop a government takeover of health care from occurring in the first place.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

shooter242
August 21, 2009 12:37 PM
It's a good idea. Conservatives arise!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
August 21, 2009 1:01 PM in reply to shooter242
...and doom yourselves to irrelevancy forever. Even if this was possible (all of the governors that said they would reject the stimulus money eventually backed down, not because of Bachmann's ridiculous reason, but because they were overruled by their legislatures, or because they faced massive opposition from voters), people in those states will turn out in droves to vote out governors who are denying them the health care benefits that people in other states were getting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marioth
August 21, 2009 1:03 PM in reply to shooter242
They had their chance to "arise" during the previous criminal enterprise posing as a presidency, and they did not do it.
Moreover, the credibility deficit of these two self-styled leaders of the GOP can only be described as astronomical.
Finally, should funds be rejected, and people who need care do not get it, the message will be GOP Hates Grandma.
Which, by all accounts, seems to be the case already.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sagesource
August 21, 2009 2:09 PM in reply to shooter242
Why don't you set an example by pledging to take no money from Medicare and Social Security?
I also expect you to start campaigning against other socialist government monopolies, like the military.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
drv
August 21, 2009 4:47 PM in reply to sagesource
Good idea. And while we're at it, I want all the anti-reform GOPers to pledge that their parents, grandparents and elderly aunts and uncles will drop out of Medicare, that evil, government run health care system. Go ahead, exercise that individual freedom you champion so much and go buy health insurance on the private market. You say you love those insurance companies and the sacrosanct competitive market so much, then, by all means, dive right in. F'ing hypocrites.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
john
August 21, 2009 12:59 PM
Actually, that sounds like a good idea, but why wait?
Why not write a bill with global health insurance reform that affects all insurance, and with a public option that the states have to agree to join. People who don't want to have access to a public option won't have to, and if they decide that it looks good later on, they can join then.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
whitenoise100
August 21, 2009 2:16 PM in reply to john
The only problem with this appproach is that corporations that don't want to provide health care for their workers or pay a penalty will relocate to the red states that opt out. The red state governors will brag about all the jobs they created by resisting the federal takeover of health care, and the race to the bottom will continue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Texas Aggie
August 21, 2009 10:59 PM in reply to whitenoise100
This might work for a corporation that didn't need literate employees, but anymore, those corporations have left the country. Now employers who are left want reasonably literate employees and you don't find a whole lot of them in the red states because they are spending their money on prisons, not on schools. So not as many employers will move in order to avoid paying health care as you might think. In addition, since we are now primarily a service rather than a manufacturing economy, businesses have to be where the clients are, and the ones with money are not in the red states.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DB55
August 21, 2009 1:03 PM
It's a great idea! Let the folks in red states lose their health insurance coverage when they get laid off, while everyone else gets to keep it. Let them be declined due to pre-existing conditions. Let them be denied access to the health insurance exchange. And let them not have the choice of a public plan. Then let's see how long those states stay red!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pppwww
August 21, 2009 1:12 PM in reply to DB55
And you could get travel insurance if you want to go to "red" places, like Jackson Hole or Texas' gulf coast!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sagesource
August 21, 2009 2:11 PM in reply to DB55
Roll all the benefits into a single package so that they can remain pure of socialism. If they want to reject Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, that will make it all the cheaper for the sane majority.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gharlane
August 21, 2009 2:14 PM in reply to DB55
I dunno, DB. These folks have been voting against their interests for decades -- generations, in fact. I see no evidence that yet another shiv in their backs, courtesy of the GOP, is suddenly going to endow them with sanity.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cwnidog
August 22, 2009 4:35 PM in reply to DB55
And don't let them move to a state that decided to opt in when they get sick.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Shrubbit
August 21, 2009 1:09 PM
YES! The Mark Sanford Strategy©. We've gotta be winning.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
traitorjoe
August 21, 2009 1:09 PM
That's right - let the Red Staters turn down the public option and Medicare. When they're sick, they can wait 12-16 hours in the emergency room for a nurse practitioner. When they get worse, they can get a free bible to pray for their health.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Savannah Evans
August 21, 2009 1:18 PM
"A collective action, on the other hand, would stand a much greater chance of success."
Wait a sec ... did Michelle Bachman really talk favorably about conservative governors forming a (*cough*) collective?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jonnienohands
August 21, 2009 2:07 PM in reply to Savannah Evans
DIRTY COMMIE!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 21, 2009 1:19 PM
Someone asked earlier (I forget which article) how many people were in on the Bachmann/DeMint call: per AFP, it was over 20,000.
Interestingly, it appears to me that AFP (funded by billionaire oil/gas guys) is starting to pivot back from healthcare to the energy legislation. Their website is featuring their "Hot Air Tour" more prominently than their "Patients First". Last night's call is buried in a blog post about a Hot Air Tour rally (with about 200 turning out according to their estimate). They're definitely using the healthcare debate to slingshot their efforts to raise their full-of-hot-air efforts to defeat CO2 controls.
Here's their buried summary of last night's call: "Following the rally last night we hosted a national tele-townhall with Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Congresswoman Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. It was great to see over 20,000 of you participating on the call and asking these great free market leaders in Congress insightful questions about how we can beat a government take over of our health care." (http://americansforprosperity.org/082109-another-great-hot-air-tour-swing-wraps-roanoke-virginia-last-night)
Thanks, TPM, for reporting on the call - it is important that we know what they're saying to their faithful, and that they know that we are listening.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
docrocktex
August 21, 2009 1:20 PM
i'm embarrassed at how ignorant these people are. every single GOPer that threatened not to take stimulus money, gladly accepted big checks from uncle sam. next, gov. perry will be threatening secession. he better not forget that hurricane season is coming. we all know he'll be begging FEMA for help by October.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pppwww
August 21, 2009 1:20 PM
the repubs really seem to be throwing their lot in with a group of astroturfers who are only a few years away from medicare eligibility. meanwhile, "[a] report by the Commonwealth Fund last year showed that 34 percent of college graduates will spend some time uninsured in the year after graduation. The report also found that two-thirds of young adults ages 19 to 29 who spent time without insurance coverage in the past year had gone without needed medical care because it cost too much" (from CNN).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
August 21, 2009 1:22 PM
DeMint and Bachmann both think God speaks directly to them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jolly ranchero
August 21, 2009 1:35 PM in reply to jeffgee
Change "to" to "thru" and it may be more accurate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
henk
August 21, 2009 1:52 PM in reply to jeffgee
I wonder how they know its God and not the other guy? The things the do and advocate are things that the other guy encourages, so Michelle, if you're listening, next time you get that call from God do *69 and find out where its really coming from.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
August 21, 2009 1:26 PM
Woman brought up on charges for denying medical care to her 2 year old child who died of a treatable infection after having a high fever for 10 days. She was arrested at a health reform protest after her husband, hiking on the Appalachian Trail, returned home and called 911.
"I didn't take my sick baby to the hospital because I didn't want that Obamacare that Fox News warned me about, and I would do it again!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jonnienohands
August 21, 2009 2:11 PM in reply to NobleCommentDecider
Was that RENO 911?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
August 21, 2009 1:27 PM
Hey Jim- wanna try secession again? It worked out real well the last time your state tried it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
UTMark
August 21, 2009 1:30 PM
Look, can we re-think the Civil War and just let some of these states head out on their own? It won't work for Looneytunes Bachmann, but she isn't representative of her state anyway. I realize this is somewhat hypocritical coming from someone who lives in Utah, but I am just full-up with these people at this point. They thump their chests for American democracy until they lose an election! Can we just set aside some of the states (particularly the ones who don't want to be a part of America with a moderately progressive Black guy as President)for those people who speak to God and will be leaving with the Rapture anyway. They can go have their own little country and leave the rest of us, who are hopelessly convinced that rational thought it a good idea, the fuck alone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
August 21, 2009 2:37 PM in reply to UTMark
To add to this idea, it'd be a great place to put all that fencing we've been working on for the border.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
traitorjoe
August 21, 2009 1:39 PM
Let Texas break away and give all Bachman-Vitter-DeMint voters a free bus ticket there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fortunatolucchesi
August 21, 2009 1:40 PM
Possibly the two lowest IQ's in Congress and possibly a few chromosomes missing between the two of them.
God save America from these self-appointed saviors!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
traitorjoe
August 21, 2009 1:49 PM in reply to fortunatolucchesi
Jim Bunning and Jeff Sessions take issue with that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pppwww
August 21, 2009 2:20 PM in reply to traitorjoe
+1
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brainpicnic
August 21, 2009 1:47 PM
Talk about containing the seeds of their own destruction.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
derekbill
August 21, 2009 1:48 PM
Anyone know if a State can be expelled from the Union? If South Carolina really wants to secede again, maybe we can give them a little push.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sagesource
August 21, 2009 2:15 PM in reply to derekbill
Who was it that said of South Carolina the last time they tried to leave, "Too small for a country, and too big for a lunatic asylum"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EricR11
August 21, 2009 2:03 PM
Ahhh, civil War, 21st century style. Doggone it though, something just feels a little bit lacking this time around.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jweb271
August 21, 2009 2:05 PM
Part of me (a part that is being more emotional than critical) thinks this is a great idea. The plan would cost far less, since the very states who need the program the most will not offer it. Their citizens will eventually move to more liberal states and have their minds blown, in a good way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SoCal1972
August 21, 2009 2:08 PM
Part of this Southern neo-secessionist talk that is surfacing really bothers me and part of me is like, screw it, let these shitbirds take a hike.
On one hand, I think sometimes it is appropriate for states to have some latitude when it comes to standards. For example California telling Bush's EPA to go take a hike, we were going to enforce tougher CO2 standards even if they wouldn't, or going ahead with public funding for embryonic stem cell research when Bush was trying to shut it down. So when it's been for progressive causes I've been in favor of it. So I guess I would say South Carolina has the right to refuse to participate ..
I guess what I'm saying is maybe it is best to let these idiots do what they want and run with their scorched earth policies. They will probably just end up paying at the ballot box. I honestly think that a lot of these guys like DeMint and those he speaks for are going through these little 1860 fantasies they have.
I remember visiting the South Carolina State Museum in Columbia a few yrs ago. Two middle aged white woman were staring wistfully at one of the exhibits that dealt with the Civil War and one of them sighed and said, "Gosh, I wish we'd won that war..." I shit you not. My question is, how many people really feel that way??
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
illlich
August 21, 2009 2:08 PM
So. . . they want to punish their poorest citizens and call it "freedom?" How long before those poor folks find out from their relatives up north that public health care is actually a boon, it didn't pull the plug on granny, and it maybe even saved them from being evicted? Then how will those elected officials appear?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brewmn61
August 21, 2009 2:15 PM in reply to illlich
"they want to punish their poorest citizens and call it "freedom?""
As Dostoevsky (or some other mopey Russian) famously said, "the only true freedom is the freedom to die."
Preferably of a treatable condition that you can't afford to get looked at.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
meyek
August 22, 2009 8:06 AM in reply to brewmn61
dostoevsky was a novelist,as was ayn rand. a compelling novel is not necessarily expert testimony. neither held major qualifications in anything other than literature, although ayn rand is worshiped by some as a libertarian genius.
there is no freedom to die. you MUST die. freedom is in what you do and are able to do before you go. if you are alive, you always have at least one more option than if you are dead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brewmn61
August 22, 2009 2:55 PM in reply to meyek
Uh, my comment was meant to be humorous. I find it ridiculous for Republicans to claim we are taking away people's "freedom" by giving them access to regular quality health care.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
August 21, 2009 2:27 PM
I dare them to deny HC to their citizens.
And one thing is for sure, they won't be ale to deny the IRS income. Do that and go directly to jail.
so all they can do is try to stop benefits.
PErhaps with new GOP "death panels" == stopping grandma from getting surgery under a govt plan?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
August 21, 2009 2:55 PM in reply to AnswerFrog
And one thing is for sure, they won't be ale to deny the IRS income. Do that and go directly to jail.
Good point - their tax dollars will be going to support things they won't have access to. They'll finally have their "taxation without representation" that they're claiming to have already. Also, we'll finally get rid of the imbalance of blue states having to subsidize the red states. Win-win!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DaveW
August 21, 2009 3:02 PM
Fine. Write it into the bill: any state can opt out of the plan. In fact let them opt out of all federal taxes and all federal programs. If they want services from the federal government, they pay for them. It will be interesting to see how their beloved Pay or Die Healthcare System works out for them. Self-inflicted eugenics is an interesting concept.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calbearinillinois
August 21, 2009 10:28 PM
Just so people understand, states do differ right now in how much they get from the Feds to pay for healthcare in their states. Medicare is pretty similar across states because its a direct Federal entitlement, but Medicaid is a state/Federal partnership. The Feds only match state contributions ( not dollar for dollar, but to a percentage that depends on the overall health index of the state). So a state like SC probably gets more back on Medicaid than others because its overall score is really bad. Or it would if SC didn't have jackass GOP governors who think cutting services to the poor (and hence also losing Federal funding) is just a great example of "fiscal conservatism".
So if DeMint really wants SC to go it alone on anything beyond benefits citizens get directly from the Feds, he can get Sanford to do it. The fact they'd both be hung up like Mussolini from a flagpole within a matter of days shouldn't stop them - its the principle that matters, don't you know.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kd1s
August 22, 2009 11:32 AM
I'm hoping that some natural disasters of sorts starts to afflict neo-con Republicans. I'm thinking something along the lines of finding a very specific genetic basis for their cravenness and idiocy. Then we can engineer a virus and eliminate the lot of them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TimFromLA
August 22, 2009 10:44 PM
I don't get it and allow me to detail it in plain simple English. If anyone could explain it, please do so:
01) DeMint And Bachmann Call On States To Collectively Fight ObamaCare If Passed: I thought Republicans or these Republicans were individualists and not collectivists, which leads to this:
02) A caller asked DeMint what the states could do in order to stop unconstitutional action by the federal government on health care. DeMint replied, "I think the key to pushing back against the federal government is some governors and state legislators who champion individual freedom."
DeMint said he would love to see states go to court to invoke the Tenth Amendment: "If we had some states come together and say the only way to save this country is to push back." He also added: "I think you'll see some states say no more, we're not going down with the federal government.": Isn't this grassroots effort another name for community activism?
03) These same Congress members have a public option with no restriction due to: preexisting condition, experimental drug and so on and why can't we?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?