DNC: Town Hall Protesters Are "Rabid Right Wing Extremists Funded By K-Street"
The DNC is out with a stinging rebuke of the tea party protesters who are disrupting health care town hall events hosted by Democratic members of Congress.
"The Republicans and their allied groups - desperate after losing two consecutive elections and every major policy fight on Capitol Hill - are inciting angry mobs of a small number of rabid right wing extremists funded by K Street Lobbyists to disrupt thoughtful discussions about the future of health care in America taking place in Congressional Districts across the country," says DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse.
However, much like we saw at the McCain-Palin rallies last year where crowds were baited with cries of 'socialist,' 'communist,' and where the birthers movement was born - these mobs of extremists are not interested in having a thoughtful discussion about the issues - but like some Republican leaders have said - they are interested in 'breaking' the President and destroying his Presidency.
Woodhouse compares the protesters to the right wingers who attended McCain-Palin rallies in the Summer and Fall of 2008 to imply that the tactics will once again fail.
"This type of anger and discord did not serve Republicans well in 2008 - and it is bound to backfire again."
You can read the entire statement below the fold. Looks like the Democratic party is fully intent on using the fringe aspect of the protesters against them and their allies of convenience in the GOP.
The Republicans and their allied groups - desperate after losing two consecutive elections and every major policy fight on Capitol Hill - are inciting angry mobs of a small number of rabid right wing extremists funded by K Street Lobbyists to disrupt thoughtful discussions about the future of health care in America taking place in Congressional Districts across the country.However, much like we saw at the McCain-Palin rallies last year where crowds were baited with cries of 'socialist,' 'communist,' and where the birthers movement was born - these mobs of extremists are not interested in having a thoughtful discussion about the issues - but like some Republican leaders have said - they are interested in 'breaking' the President and destroying his Presidency.
These mobs are bussed in by well funded, highly organized groups run by Republican operatives and funded by the special interests who are desperately trying to stop the agenda for change the President was elected to bring to Washington. Despite the headline grabbing nature of these angry mobs and their disruptions of events, they are not reflective of where the American people are on the issues - or the hundreds of thousands of thoughtful discussions taking place around kitchen tables, water coolers and in homes.
The right wing extremists' use of things like devil horns on pictures of our elected officials, hanging members of Congress in effigy, breathlessly questioning the President's citizenship and the use of Nazi SS symbols and the like just shows how outside of the mainstream the Republican Party and their allies are. This type of anger and discord did not serve Republicans well in 2008 - and it is bound to backfire again.


















First things first: they need a name. Something derogatory or mocking. Something like the name "Birthers" which is just now code for the birth certificate wackos.
August 4, 2009 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Josh's coinage: teashirts.
August 4, 2009 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Teaple works too...
August 4, 2009 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Teashirt Teaple?
August 4, 2009 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like that.
August 4, 2009 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Teaple. Love it.
August 4, 2009 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about "mobbyists"?
August 4, 2009 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heh
August 4, 2009 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about the D-Bag Teabags
August 4, 2009 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Progressives might ougtta start thinking about what to do about the Republicans' latest strategy of shouting down health care reform town hall meetings. Ignoring them isn't gonna cut it. Playing "we're better than thou" isn't going to resolve matters either.
Now, I'm not suggesting that the fiasco should culminate in a knock down, drag out, but I AM suggesting that "team blue" show up in force in order to make it abundantly clear to "team red" that disruptions of the proceedings will not be tolerated. Somebody needs to tell these howling baboons to shut the hell up. I volunteer.
You all might want to consider showing up at the town halls in your areas. Here's the list as posted on the Conservatives for Patients Rights website: http://www.cprights.org/townhalls.php
(*Verify before attending).
August 4, 2009 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm all for showing up so the cameras see they're a minority, but I'm against trying to confront them. We can't deal with this by putting together our own party force to counter them. It didn't work for the Weimer Republic when the Social Democrats did it and it won't work for us. These brownshirt tactics represent a calcualted and deliberate assault against democracy itself. If our governmental institutions fail to deal with them at a governmental level--meaning arrests and misdemeanor convictions where warranted--the teashirts win and we're another long step closer to collapse.
August 4, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been following your comparisons to the Wiemar Republic and I think you are exactly right.
August 4, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is only because the social democrats underestimated the ability of the extremists to control the debate. Much as is happening now with the tea baggers. The Weimar democrats failed to perceive the severity of the situation and the extremists (Nazis) took over eventually. End of democracy.
It can happened there, it can happen anywhere.
August 5, 2009 2:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the link.
August 4, 2009 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Blast 'em with silly string.
August 4, 2009 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
And kudos to Gloria Borger at CNN for telling it like it is:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/04/borger.health.shouting/index.html?iref=topnews
August 4, 2009 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, no.
Chuck Grassley is earnestly working on this issue? Obama and Pelosi are wrongly demonizing the insurance companies who are actually onboard for everything except that minor little ol' public option thingee? No mention of the fact that those poor demonized insurance companies are funding the people who are orchestrating this astroturf, bussed-in thuggery to the tune of tens of millions of dollars?
Same old "on one hand, on the other hand, both sides are equally blameworthy, where's the bipartisan spirit?" crap the Serious People in the Village spew 24/7.
August 4, 2009 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed.
I had to re-check the author's name because it read like a David Broder piece.
August 4, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Full speed ahead boys and girls!
Expose the phonies and get our based fired-up at the same time.
August 4, 2009 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
They're doing a lot more than just trying imply that they're doomed to fail by linking them to the Palin crowd nuts. First, they're not just comparing them "the protesters to the right wingers who attended McCain-Palin rallies in the Summer and Fall of 2008," they're tying to point out that, for all practical purposes, they're the exact same people.
Second, and far more importantly, they're trying to force a change in the way the teevee MSM has been reporting this story. They're tying to force them to acknoweldge and report on the astroturf angle. I suspect they tried very hard to get the teevee people to do this behind the scenes and off the record, but failed becuase those silly factual details were distracting from the MSM's ability to tell a good story about juicy, sweet, delicious, ratings-enhancing conflict between salt of the earth rural yokels and effete urban elitists. So now they're settling for plan B--better a "some people say" reference to the truth than none at all.
But I have to admit, whatever else they may be, these people aren't "outside the mainstream of the Republican Party" as it exists today. I'd have to say that they are the mainstream of the Republican Party as it exists today.
August 4, 2009 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. They are the mainstream of the Republican Party as it now exists. What sets the teashirt brigade apart is merely that they are the bolder and louder examples of your typical Republican. However, to the extent that they are portrayed as wacko extremists, all the better.
August 4, 2009 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd have to say that they are the mainstream of the Republican Party as it exists today
Yes. And they'll remain that way until sane Republicans start speaking up and diluting their power. If any sane Republicans still exist.
I don't think any do, sadly.
August 4, 2009 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lots of sane former Republicans, though. I know a lot of them. They're still fundementally conservative, but they can't bear to be associated with the crazy assclowns any longer.
August 4, 2009 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I said on the other thread, linking the tea-shirts to the RNCC isn't going to get this story legs. That's business as usual. What will really get this story moving is linking them to the insurance and pharma lobby. Just saying "K street" is too indirect.
Say it explicitly. These guys are sponsored by insurance and pharma trade groups and are out to disrupt serious discussion and prevent reform at all costs.
August 4, 2009 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
From SourceWatch:
CPR is founded by this guy:
"Conservatives for Patients Rights is a front group organized in 2009 by Richard Scott to fight U.S. president Barack Obama's proposals for health reform. According to the Politico news site, Scott has raised $20 million to fight health care reform.[1]"
"CRC Public Relations -- the conservative PR firm previously known as Creative Response Concepts -- works with Conservatives for Patients Rights. CRC is the firm "that masterminded the 'Swift boat' attacks against 2004 Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kerry," reported the Washington Post. [2] "
"Maggie Mahar at the Century Foundation's Health Beat blog reports that Scott previously started the for-profit hospital chain in 1987 that later became the $23 billion Columbia/HCA. He was ousted from this post in 1997 after an FBI investigation of Columbia/HCA that led to 14 felony convictions and $1.7 billion in criminal and civil fines for Medicare fraud.[5]"
Creative Response Concepts, an Alexandria, Virginia-based public relations firm, "has many links to the Republican Party and the conservative movement," Eric Boehlert wrote September 10, 2004, in Salon.
"Among its clients are the Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee. Its client list also includes the Christian Coalition, National Taxpayers Union, Media Research Council [sic] and Regnery Publishing. Regnery is the firm that published Unfit for Command, the SBVT screed against [John] Kerry's military record," Boehlert wrote".
"Rick Scott is a multimillionaire former hospital CEO who, in 2009, emerged as a prominent leader of the opposition to U.S. President Barack Obama's healthcare reform plans. Scott founded a group called Conservatives for Patients' Rights and put $5 million of his own money towards a television advertising campaign aimed at trying to build resistance to any proposal for a government-run health insurance program. Creative Response Concepts is running the campaign.[citation needed] "
So he's a multi-millionaire former hospital CEO who defrauded Medicare?
The big question is where did this $20 million in funding come from? United Healthcare, Aetna ... who? Or is it just GOP funding????
August 4, 2009 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
They're doing a lot more than just trying imply that they're doomed to fail by linking them to the Palin crowd nuts. First, they're not just comparing them "the protesters to the right wingers who attended McCain-Palin rallies in the Summer and Fall of 2008," they're tying to point out that, for all practical purposes, they're the exact same people.
Second, and far more importantly, they're trying to force a change in the way the teevee MSM has been reporting this story. They're tying to force them to acknoweldge and report on the astroturf angle. I suspect they tried very hard to get the teevee people to do this behind the scenes and off the record, but failed becuase those silly factual details were distracting from the MSM's ability to tell a good story about juicy, sweet, delicious, ratings-enhancing conflict between salt of the earth rural yokels and effete urban elitists. So now they're settling for plan B--better a "some people say" reference to the truth than none at all.
But I have to admit, whatever else they may be, these people aren't "outside the mainstream of the Republican Party" as it exists today. I'd have to say that they are the mainstream of the Republican Party as it exists today.
August 4, 2009 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Crap. I hate it when that happens.
August 4, 2009 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Instead of calling them "special interests" groups, why do Democrats have such a hard time just saying "insurance companies."
August 4, 2009 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why the hell are these folks allowed to shout down a town hall meeting? Forget the subject matter-why are these folks not unceremoniously ejected for disruption? Protest all they want outside but once in, they have to behave-otherwise they are ejected.
What am I missing?
August 4, 2009 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
They'll have an uphill battle in doing this but I think that's what should be done.
But it shouldn't be that hard. Can you imagine how these "protesters" would have been treated by the media had it been President O'Riley, R, and Republicans with big majorities in both chambers? They'd be treated as a ludicrous joke, and we'd hear nothing but eulogies about the Democratic Party.
August 4, 2009 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better late than never, I guess.
What we've got to do is simply outdo them. Get more people out to stand up and stop them.
August 4, 2009 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is not on the DNC website. Where is the original?
August 4, 2009 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Weimar Democrats=>Brownshirts
Duh!
The problem with this pathetic whining is that the DNC and the DSCC/DCCC are, themselves, just cringing liberals funded by K-Street. Big Lobby derives most of its income from the bi-partisan government concessions slavishly protected by "Hold Harmless!" Democrats who "Jes' He'p Ever'body!", well, anybody with big-bucks, but, now, whine when it comes down to ... zero-sum.
When Democrats took over in 2006, they were ecstatic when K-Street expanded by hiring washed-up "politicos" like Martin Frost.
Only, bi-partisan lobbies get more for their money from a monopoly on government held by the Federalist-Whig GOP. There is just no good reason they should hire corrupt Democrats and set-aside money for the race-tokens they despise.
So, they are perfectly happy to fund Brownshirts. They will probably get a better return on their money from that than the DNC gets from expensive entourages for their own fat, lazy big-wigs. None of that trickles-down to local parties through a stable of consultants and patronage-chain of retirees.
We can ridicule the far-right wing-nuts. But, that does nothing about the fact that the soft center of the Democratic Party is selling out the electorate to K-Street -- always the highest bidder, what with their pipeline to the Fed and a revolving door of bi-partisan crony capitalists at the Treasury Department and, of course, on the key Senate and House Committees.
Wishy-washy Weimar Democrats, Limosine Liberals, Arlen Spectors, and the like attract Brownshirts.
This is not new or mysterious. Weimar Democrats legalized what used to be "policy rackets" and claims-processing "mills" as soon as the organized crime figures involved hired a lobbyist for the benefit of Democrats and got religion to cover their rears with the GOP.
Now, the bi-partisan concession-tenders in DC get to live with what they did: That would be to provide every comfort for themselves and their cronies, two-bit shit for the rest of us. They do not even know what insurance is. Why should they? They are covered. Insurance is a financial institution, not an industry. And, Gramm-Clinton, Bernanke-Geithner do not believe in regulating financial institutions, just bailing them and their cronies out of duly registered, up-lawyered Ponzi-schemes.
August 4, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody did a good job of talking to the local media when Hoyer's meeting was interrupted. They made statements to the press that the teabaggers were rude, pushing the elderly, not letting the elderly speak. And said they had just come to hear their Congressman and talk about their health care. So if you go to a meeting, try to make sure someone talks to the local media and gives a more sane version against the interruptions and chaos. Most people do watch their local news.
August 4, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd suggest too, check in on your state and local regulations regarding such meetings, and how location influences the legality of the types of actions the disrupters are using. If you find that there are civil and criminal infractions that may apply, be sure to bring that up with your local law enforcement before the event.
"Fighting words" are not protected speech. Don't forget to bring your camera if it is permitted, particularly if it records audio.
Oh my - I just remembered that "disorderly conduct" is what this sort of thing is called in a lot of jurisdictions.
There's a part of me that really wants to see some of this crowd ranting about police officers infringing on their rights, after getting arrested for disrupting one of these events. That would be weapons-grade irony.
August 4, 2009 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The birthers, the tea baggers, and this gang that is now disrupting Democracy town halls are nothing more than the rabble to me, and rabble rousing is their forte.
I think most are people that were never picked for the team or never felt that they belonged to anything. Today, for the first time, they belong.
For maybe the first time in their life they see themselves as having value and that's why they travel by bus to conduct their rabble rousing.
They all have this insecurity in common, and its compounded by their lack of political sophistication. They're the mile wide-half inch deep crowd.
They finally belong, belong to a group where its Group love, in. Group hate, out.
I'd handle them by inviting the loudest up on stage for a mini debate. Any of the least informed Dem Congressmen/women should be able to make an ass of them in 3 minutes.
August 4, 2009 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
JohnW1141 has hit the nail on the head. I'm afraid these kinds of people are ripe for the picking by rightwing, fascist-oriented groups, if history is any guide. And I've been saying that getting them on stage one-on-one after they give their name and place of residence, and having them speak to the crowd (who must be instructed to hold their applause--since the lobbyists behind them have told them to applaud whatever their cohort says) and see if they can do anything more than mumble incoherently. Then end by asking who paid them to appear?
August 4, 2009 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
MyMy,
we should have a rating system and rate these troglodytes by the stupidity and irrelevancy of the sign they're carrying.
August 4, 2009 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
JohnW1141 and MyMy get it
It's one thing to engage in debate amongst ourselves about this or that policy alternative but we have to realize what it is we are all really fighting for and who it is we are all fighting against
Yea they're amusing if not faintly ridiculous but do not take them for granted
When they say they want HCR to be Obama's Waterloo remember which army you're in.....
August 4, 2009 7:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fight of the Century!
"Rabid Right Wing Extremists Funded By K-Street"
versus
"Cringing Liberals Funded By K-Street"
August 4, 2009 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
All they need is a beer hall.
August 4, 2009 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, a scary press release. Printed words. Watch out, Repugs! There's a not nice press release about you.
That's garbage! These nuts do not care about harsh language. They need to be confronted by our side every time they disrupt these town hall meetings. We outnumber them.
Remember, Brownshirts only respect force. I'm not saying to hit them, not at all. Just show up and stand up to them.
August 4, 2009 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink