TPMDC

Grassley: September Health Care Compromise Seems Unlikely

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) wants (you guessed it) yet more time to reach a health care compromise on the Senate Finance Committee.

Asked by reporters for Kaiser Health News if a mid-September deadline to unveil legislation was still in the works, Grassley said, "If you asked me that on Aug. 6, I would have said yes, I think so, September. But you're asking me on Aug. 27 and you've got the impact of democracy in America. Everybody's showing up at town meetings."

As ranking member on the committee, and chief Republican health care negotiator, Grassley has demanded a number of significant compromises, and set benchmarks--such as an 80 vote threshold for legislation--that most observers believe to be unreachable. Senate Minority Whip John Kyl (R-AZ) has said the GOP almost certainly won't support legislation out of that committee, triggering calls from a growing number of Democrats for Finance chairman Max Baucus to scrap the negotiations and proceed without (or with minimal) Republican support.

Join the Conversation!

34 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

August 28, 2009 9:27 AM   

Excellent! Finance committee has no contribution to make, so it's time to vote on the HELP bill, which the Senate should have done a month ago.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:36 AM   

Wonder if he said it, with a mission accomplished banner behind him!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:38 AM   

Why Senator Grassley, between your comments over the last month, and Senator Enzi's admission that he is only trying to neuter a bill he won't vote for, of course there won't be compromise. The only question is whether Baucus and Conrad are willing the tell you to eff off or if they believe the same malarkey that you do

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:43 AM    in reply to holyhandgrenaid

No it just means they'll work harder for a compromise and give up more and more. Grassley, Enzi and co will tease going along, but always ask for a bit more and a bit more. The Enzi, Grassley plan is to take so much away that the Progressives reject the bill and it's likely going to happen because Obama and Reid are getting played for fools.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 11:23 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

People like Enzi are just mean spirited, money seeking hoars, who never learned the lesson, ...wait for it...The ENZs don't justify the MEANS!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:39 AM   

Who gets to decide that minority hypocrites a.k.a. republicans or Democrats who have a 59 vote majority?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:41 AM   

I can't believe the Dems are allowing themselves to be rolled by this clown. I'm beginning to think choosing Obama over HRC was a mistake. Republicans throw his bipartisan desires against him at every turn and still don't vote for the measure anyways. So they strip the better bill and then vote against the compromise - and it's going to happen again and again.

The longer Grassley and Co. can delay this bill the less time there will be to focus on other Obama campaign promises. Dem are going to lose Senate and House seats in 2010 and then the GOP will claim Obama lost his mandate and will further step up their obstruction. It's so damn obvious and Obama and Reid are playing along. Obama has been pretty much an epic disappointment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 10:02 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Blah, blah, blah....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 10:41 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

You have not been paying attention here over the past week or so. Congressional Democrats and the Administration has made it quite clear that they are ready to move on to reconciliation as needed to pass health care.

And the idea that President Obama has been a disappointment is nothing short of ludicrous. Can you say "stimulus bill, stem cell research, rescinding many of Shrub's environmental disaster executive orders, halting the economic catastrophe", just for starters? HRC could not come close to what he has accomplished in just 7 months. And the majority of the stimulus effects are still in the pipeline.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:47 AM   

As far as I can tell, choosing Obama (over HRC) was still the right move. However, we have to move this health care bill.

The FC should vote on the HELP bill. Grassley and the GOP do not want to negotiate in good faith. Vote on the HELP bill. Please. Get it out of committee -- get it to the floor and then do the amendment process. This is the only way to ensure health care gets done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:53 AM   

Chuck Grassley is not the boss of us. He is from Iowa, not Oz. He has no special powers. Pass him by, go for the reform we need.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:53 AM   

Golly, who could have predicted that, after successfully delaying progress for a month, Grassley would advocate for more delays?????????

They got nothing left. The economy is going to rebound, and Republicans aren't going to be able to take credit for it, given those awesome vote totals earlier this year. If healthcare gets passed, they won't be able to take credit for that, either.

Crazy-as-a-bedbug Jim Demint was right about Waterloo. Only it ain't Obama's Waterloo.

Can they just ignore the finance committee?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:59 AM   

Who cares what Grassley thinks? He isn't interested in any reform that would actually have salutary effect.

A Democrats only plan is the best option. Any Democrat that opposes that should be voted out of office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 10:03 AM    in reply to Rich in NJ

Right. Screw him. We don't need his stinking vote. Just ram it through with Democratic support.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

wj

user-pic

August 28, 2009 10:18 AM   

I don't think the majority of Democratic senators--and even Rahm Emmanuel and possibly Obama himself--really *want* a public option if this means (as it certainly does) that the monies of health insurance and pharma will now go exclusively to Republicans. I am becoming more and more persuaded that with the exception of certain very progressive legislators in the house and senate, the Democratic party is as scared of upsetting the corporate oligarchs as the Republican party is eager to bow down before them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 10:54 AM   

F*ck Grassley. Let's get this job done for the American people!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 11:18 AM   

Go away GRASSHOLE

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 11:35 AM   

To be followed by...

Grassley: October Health Care Compromise Seems Unlikely
Grassley: November Health Care Compromise Seems Unlikely
Grassley: December Health Care Compromise Seems Unlikely
Grassley: January Health Care Compromise Seems Unlikely


.... you get the idea.

Grassley also thinks that election results should be ignored in favor of listening to the crazies barking at Town Halls.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

wj

user-pic

August 28, 2009 11:42 AM   

I love how everybody is angry at Grassley instead of being angry at Emmanuel or Obama. Don't you think that if they *really* wanted action on a *specific* plan including a public option they would have directed Baucus to ignore the Republicans? Remember the pressure they put on the Progressives to support the War Funding bill? Where is that pressure now?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 11:49 AM   

Let me Twitter speak this so Grassley understands:

Sen Grasley U got nerve btchn bout sked when U sightseeing Hannitys taint to tell us time to wait. We will reconcil this on skedul/even workinWKEND. G0 FK UrSLEF GRASSLWEY

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:07 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

i made lots of laughing noises

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:08 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

Hah hah...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 2:23 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

hee hee!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:14 PM   

Don't blame Grassley. He's only as important as Obama and Reid allow him to be.

This is Obama and Reid's failure of political will, skill and courage.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:24 PM    in reply to tommyo

yeah so

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:18 PM   

Grassley and the R's are simply begging to be sidelined. They must think that it is somehow to their advantage to be shut out of the process, as in then they campaign robustly against the passed reform in 2010. They could be very wrong about that.

Let's give them what they want. Also.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:27 PM   

Well, if we had a Senate that had not evolved into a bunch of effete snobs, who value each other's camaraderie and mutual respect more than they value getting work done for us, we could just move along to a majority vote.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:34 PM   

I'm still inclined to believe that Obama and crew are giving these guys enough rope to hang themselves with....believing Americans will sour on their obsturctionism. Although I must say, some of the comments about Rahm and Obama getting had and not standing up to fight are starting to resonate a bit more. The problem here is that as Obama loses leftie's approval, his political capital decreases.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 12:56 PM   

Fine. Do it with out one Republican. Time to move on.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 2:24 PM    in reply to indianadave

Amazing, simply stunning, that there remains any question of moving the health care bill without Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 1:43 PM   

Morning you'all: I don't have much to say, as I believe all you liberals have said it all already, but I need to repeat my advice of yesterday: forget the republicans, and pass the bill with or without their support. Let the chips fall where they may. Have a great w/e everyone.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 5:21 PM   

I don't believe a word Grassley says

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 7:59 PM    in reply to neesy08

Including "of" and "the"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 5:29 PM   

That's it, kick it down the road. The longer this can be stretched out without a decision, the better chances are to defeat it. Yay status quo. Grassley is trying to create the impression of an impossibility voting out a bill in the hopes that it will move public opinion. The real truth is that he's a status quo guy, and wants no change.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular