Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) has a proposition: If the government is going to mandate that Americans buy health insurance from private companies, they should know how much of that money actually goes to paying health insurance costs. And insurers aren't happy about it.
On Friday, Rockefeller sent letters to executives at the 15 largest health insurance companies in the country, asking them to compile data on this question for the Senate Commerce Committee by September 8.
"It's another page out of the same playbook," says Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans. "There's an effort to shift the focus to the health insurance industry rather than on the bills in Congress."
When Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) asked for similar information regarding executive compensation at private health insurance companies, AHIP called it a "fishing expedition."
If Rockefeller wants info on what's known as the medical-loss ratio, Zirkelbach says, "health insurers already provide that information to state insurance commissioners, federal regulators, and the SEC."
AHIP's response is indicative of the industry's position on the inquiry. But the decision of whether to comply with Rockefeller's (or Waxman's) inquiry will fall to individual executives.
Rockefeller is a committed reformer, and a member of the Senate Finance Committee. But he's been largely shut out of the panel's health care negotiations for several weeks.


The Old Grouch
August 25, 2009 4:01 PM
When in doubt, subpoena.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rumpole
August 25, 2009 4:02 PM
what he said.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JoshQuasimoto
August 25, 2009 4:02 PM
From the above, "It's another page out of the same playbook," says Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans. "There's an effort to shift the focus to the health insurance industry rather than on the bills in Congress."
What the fuck? Is this guy really a spokesman? How can we not talk about the details in the Health Insurance industry and those private insurance practitioners in a Health-reform bill. Surely it would be ignorant to think that Health-reform legislation won't effect the private (for-profit) Health Insurance industry. Maybe it is distracting to him, but how distracting is it if you are facing bankruptcy from health-care related cost and you hear anti-reformers pushing the status quo. Pre-existing conditions, which are used by the private health insurance industry, force people to go it alone without health-insurance and in many cases end up in some state-supported system or a federal-supported system. SO basically the Health-Insurers protect their profits by kicking people off of their rolls, or refusing procedures (ie rationing) and then defend the private market while stoking the rhetoric of anti-government reform of health-care.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Xantar
August 25, 2009 4:13 PM in reply to JoshQuasimoto
That's exactly what I was thinking. If you're enacting health care reform that will affect private insurance companies, why exactly is it wrong to put some focus on the private insurance companies? Doing otherwise would be like setting up a war involving lots of private military contractors and not scrutinizing the backgrounds of the military contractors you hire.
Oh wait a second...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
August 25, 2009 4:30 PM
This exactly the right thing to do and (to me at least) a surprising display of gumption by Rockefeller. Put them on the defensive. Make them show themselves for scumbags they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sunnysteve
August 25, 2009 4:45 PM
It's really quite simple. They don't want us to know.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
August 25, 2009 4:53 PM in reply to sunnysteve
Exactly!!! And the corporatists are masters at turning the conversation back around
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Old Grouch
August 25, 2009 6:32 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Insurance companies are in the business of raising investment capital, not providing "coverage" to their insureds.
It bears repeating.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JoshQuasimoto
August 25, 2009 7:16 PM in reply to The Old Grouch
Exactly! This is why the America people can not trust the Insurance companies alone to provide good health-care coverage for all Americans. This is also why you can have a private marketplace and a public marketplace which ensures that all Americans have coverage. I mean hell it was easier to require all drivers to have insurance for the auto's than it is to ensure the health and welfare of every-american, talk about putting cart before the horse.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
August 26, 2009 2:23 AM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?