TPMDC

Poll: Huckabee Trails Obama Only Narrowly; Palin Way Behind


Former Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

A new national survey from Public Policy Policy (D) finds President Obama leading four potential Republicans with, with Mike Huckabee currently polling as the strongest opponent -- and Sarah Palin as the weakest.

The numbers: Obama leads Huckabee 47%-44%; Obama is ahead of Newt Gingrich 49%-41%; Obama leads Mitt Romney 47%-40%; and Obama is ahead of Sarah Palin 52%-38%.

Huckabee also has the best personal ratings of the four tested Republicans, with 45% favorable to 28% unfavorable. Gingrich is at 33%-42%, Romney 37%-34%, and Palin 40%-49%.

Join the Conversation!

19 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

August 20, 2009 11:57 AM   

The pattern here is that the more a Republican has been in the limelight, the less popular he or she is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:02 PM    in reply to Frog Leg

Exactly. Huckabee hasn't had to actually propose any ideas or policy plans, so poll respondents mostly just project good values onto him. And he is, after all, very amiable in person. People are generally going to have a favorable view of him personally.

It's really kind of discouraging how easily a certain segment of the population falls into buyer's remorse. They elect Obama and then start disapproving of him when he starts doing something that not everybody in the country agrees with.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:00 PM   

I have to say that Huckabee scares me more than any other Repub candidate. Palin's a twit, Gingrich just comes across as a bitter a-hole, Romney's too plastic, but Huckabee comes across as very, very likeable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:12 PM    in reply to SchrodingersCat

Unfortunately, I agree with you. The huckster is definitely likeable. The kind of guy you would like to have a beer with. Of course he would be a complete disaster like the king. Hopefully rambo palin locks up the religious wacko vote and gets the nod from the rump base of the repuke party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:05 PM   

Well, Huckabee is likeable but he hasn't been scrutizined. I think the country has to fall pretty far off the cliff for the voters to hand the keys back over to another Southern fundamentalist Christian right-winger.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:05 PM   

Well, Huckabee is likeable but he hasn't been scrutizined. I think the country has to fall pretty far off the cliff for the voters to hand the keys back over to another Southern fundamentalist Christian right-winger.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 4:24 PM    in reply to felix

Likeable? Sez you!!!! He's the worst kind of snake. Comes off as a nice guy but in reality he's worse than a snake. My apologies to snake for the comparison.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:24 PM   

The Huckabeast was my man in 2008

And he's my man in 2012

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 4:23 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

How does it feel to be a loser. Is that workin for ya??

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 12:34 PM   

Ok, these mofos severly damaged our country and are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents in iraq. What do they do write a freaking book 4 years after their lies and distortions. This is priceless and why isn't this a crime?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/20/tom-ridge-i-was-pressured_n_264127.html

Why aren't these people going to jail? I don't get it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 1:10 PM   

There are three types of Republicans.

1. Racist Guy
2. God-is-a-Republican Guy.
3. Money-is-more-important-than-people Guy.

God-is-a-Republican guy love him. After all, he is an ordained minister who has pastored before.

Racist Guy doesn't care as long as he doesn't help or protect any minority.

The problem with Huckabee is that the money Republicans don't like him. While he would be their strongest candidate in a general election, he can't get nominated over any decent opposition.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 1:38 PM   

Why do you think he started his own TV show? To get better known....for HIS presidential run in 2012.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 2:50 PM   

I think Huckabee would be worse than Dubya. I don't think Dubya really ever bought that end-of-days bullshit, or that he had an exclusive hotline to god.

I fear that if Huckabee were confronted with something like the Cuban Missile Crisis, where one choice might lead to the apocalypse, he'd go for it.

Too late he'd find out that he'd unleashed Ragnarok, not Armageddon.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 5:21 PM    in reply to Minne sconsin

I don't think Dubya really ever bought that end-of-days bullshit, or that he had an exclusive hotline to god.

Oh, but he did.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 3:04 PM   

My response to these early match-up polls: whatev.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 3:11 PM   

47 - 44? Gawd, this country is really screwed up. Snake oil just drips off Huckabee, he makes my skin crawl.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 3:54 PM   

Oh criminy, give me a break. Match-up polls mean less than nothing this far out. They are the opposite of information, especially when the recession is still biting. The only reason a poll like this gets taken this time of year is get the pollster's name in the news and keep their name-recognition going. They do it for free. It's part of the advertising budget.

If that still doesn't calm your angst, dig into the cross tabs and look at the approval ratings based on who the respondent voted for. 91% of Obama voters still approve of him, 4% don't, 6% aren't sure. 10% of McCain voters approve of him. 41% of the people who voted for someone else or can't remember who they voted for (that concept never fails to amaze me) are for him.

90% of liberals approve, 62% of moderates, 21% of conservatives. The coalition that delivered him 367 electoral votes is intact. As to the rest, he's doing pretty damn good for a guy presiding over an the highest unemployment rate in decades.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 4:18 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

I so agree with you. I am so sick of these polls at this point in time which mean absolutely nothing. Can we focus on the real stuff instead of this crap,

And I also agree that our President is doing a damn good job of running this country considering what he has to work with. I also agree with the President that we need to stop listening to cable chatter all day long. It's enough to make you crazy Where were these a'holes when Bush was in office. I don't remember hearing every day every little thing Bush was doing - in fact just the opposite - he was fucking up this country while the MSM were picking their noses or something similar.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 20, 2009 4:10 PM   

ex-NCSteve makes an excellent point. If the latest Gallup approval tracking numbers were mirrored in the two party vote in the '12 election, Obama would win almost 55% of the vote and HuckaRomneyPalin would get 45% -- an even bigger blowout than in '08.

But progressives always need something to worry about, I guess.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular