A new Rasmussen poll of Massachusetts finds that the state's voters agree with Sen. Ted Kennedy that the governor should be able to make an appointment to a vacant Senate seat.
Respondents were first asked an open question about whether there should be a gubernatorial appointment or a special election to fill a vacant seat. At first, the answer was widely for elections at 66%, with 27% in favor of appointment.
But then the question was rephrased: "Under Massachusetts law a special election is held to fill an open senate seat. While waiting for a special election should the governor appoint an interim senator?" In this case, 52% approved of an interim Senate appointment by the governor, with only 40% against it.
The truly interesting part here is that Massachusetts law used to provide for gubernatorial appointment, and then an election at the next regular Congressional cycle, until 2004. The law was changed when John Kerry was the Democratic nominee for President, while Republican Mitt Romney was governor. Ultimately, Kerry didn't win that presidential election, and this change in the law appears to have had a serious unintended consequence for Democrats.
Rasmussen makes clear in the polling analysis that Ted Kennedy's name was not mentioned in the poll in any way. But chances are, the voters have seen enough news coverage to know what's going on -- for example, Democrats widely favor the change to the law, and Republicans oppose it.


junkmailqueen
August 21, 2009 1:49 PM
Hmmmm, not so fast, sez the leadership:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/08/21/leaders_cool_to_kennedys_request_to_appoint_interim_senate_successor/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
August 21, 2009 2:32 PM
This only makes sense. They never should have changed the rule in the first place.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
August 21, 2009 2:32 PM
Really fucking loyalty there.
The guy is only a legend in Mass. who has served the public his entire life.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
August 21, 2009 3:14 PM
This is bullshit. Kennedy should've given up his seat in May last year. But NO. He has to be an immovable dynastic fucknut. Arrogant bastard.
As to serving the public: C'mon. The only Senators that truly served the public in the last 20 years are Sanders, Feingold and Wellstone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
August 21, 2009 4:21 PM in reply to tiowally
I wouldn't be quite so hard on him, but I do agree that he should have retired last year. Byrd needs to go too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tosh
August 21, 2009 6:25 PM in reply to Jim H
I suspect that if Byrd is in real bad shape that he's trying to hold out at least until 2010 when an appointment would serve out the balance of his term and run in 2012. If he resigns now, they would be up for election in *both* 2010 (special election for the balance of the term) and 2012.
Byrd already broke Strom's record for tenure in the Senate. Obviously he would like to break Hayden's record for total Congressional service, which he's less than three months from. Of course Dingell is just three year behind Byrd, in better health and a good bet to break the record.
John
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
David Sloane
August 24, 2009 10:50 AM
Eric - You say "Ultimately, Kerry didn't win that presidential election, and this change in the law appears to have had a serious unintended consequence for Democrats."
The consequence is in the future, isn't it? Unless you think Kennedy hasn't resigned his seat as a result of the 2004 law, it's all potential consequences, right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VotersOfNY
August 31, 2009 6:00 PM
Sure change the law AGAIN to suit your needs. Massachusetts has the dumbest voters on the planet. You kept electing a murderer for 40+ years. He's croaked now and going to meet his maker. We all know where a drunk, womanizing, egotistical murderer is going. You idiots in Massachusetts ought to be ashamed for being so dumb.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?