Schumer Says Reconciliation Still An Option, Confident That Public Option (Or Something Like It) Will Prevail
Breaking his silence today, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters that Democrats won't hesitate to pass reform legislation as part of October's filibuster-proof budget reconciliation bill--if, that is, Max Baucus and Senate Finance Committee negotiators don't come to agreement on a bipartisan package before their new September 15 deadline. Schumer said he wants a bipartisan agreement, but if that proves impossible, "it is not going to stop us from moving forward with health care."
"[W]e will have contingencies in place," Schumer said "Health reform is just too important to let this window pass by."
Schumer's been the public face for the idea of creating a public option on a level playing field with private insurers. But he's also the chairman of the Rules Committee, and in that regard his affirmation of the reconciliation process should carry a great deal of weight.
Still, he says, he'd prefer a bipartisan solution. And on the question of those negotiations, Schumer says that despite the fact that the Senate Finance Committee is likely to endorse a co-op system instead of a public option, he's confident that the final bill will contain the latter.
"I'm not going to settle for something that just is a fig leaf," Schumer said, noting that "negotiations are are not at all finished yet, so we'll have to see."
Once the Finance Committee settles on something, though, Schumer said the real fight will come later.
"[T]here will be fights on the Senate floor," Schumer said.
The HELP Committee is an equal committee to the Finance Committee. They have a good public option. The House has a public option much along the lines that I laid out originally in terms of the level playing field. The President is for a public option. So I'm optimistic that there will be a good, strong public option at the end of the day.
Schumer also acknowledged, though, that the public option...might not be so public. "I've said this time and time again, I don't care what you call it," he said. "As long as you meet the criteria of being available to every American, being available on the first day and being strong enough so that the option will be able to go up against both the big insurance companies and the big suppliers." That leaves open the possibility that he could support, and Congress might settle upon, a private co-op system as long as it accomplished some of the public option's key goals.


















Look, I don't know if the rest of you are as fed up as I am with the obstruction and political game playing going on with this health care reform...but I DO know this - the Republican obstructionists and the Blue Dog Dems have absolutely NO clue what the rest of us are going through with healthcare. Maybe it's time they did!
If you agree, please sign the petition below, and forward it - any way you can - to anyone and everyone you know! Time to let them know how we feel!!!!
http://www.petitiononline.com/PubOp676/petition.html
August 3, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I need to disagree with you.
They understand.
They just dont care.
Go Chuck!
Other dems should take note that they need to come forward and state they will pass reform like Schumer now has.,
August 3, 2009 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Sen. Schumer says "I don't care what you call it."
Interesting, that Republicans are so opposed to a government-run public option.
Then why aren't they rallying against Medicare?
August 3, 2009 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I have to give Schumer some gruding respect on this one.
FWIW, if the health care industry continues to fund 'tea baggers' to disrupt public meetings and harass members of Congress (as well as their constituents), IMHO the Dems ought to simply put a public plan on the table and ban Big Pharma and Big Health Insurers altogether.
If those special interests have resorted to thuggery -- and clearly, they have -- the Dems ought to keep things simple and trump them by creating a public system. Period.
Dems would then signal that they aren't going to stand for being harassed, intimidated, insulted, and threatened.
August 3, 2009 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is never going to get anything done on health care reform because he has people like Evan Bayh who are sabotaging the reform process.
Check this clip out where he basically validates every single lie that Sean Hannity tells.
What a douche.
http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=2382
August 3, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does Schumer count Conrad's baloney co-op plan as single payer?
August 3, 2009 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
oops. I meant "public option."
August 3, 2009 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chuck is clearly on board. I know you focused on the piece where he said that "he doesn't care what you call it," but I would emphasize the fact that Schumer wants an option that's available to every American. That is critical. Crucial. If we have a public option that allows the uninsured to simply pay the government for their own health insurance, when they're uninsured, we're screwed. That's not changing one thing. The public option has to be made available to everyone. This will lower costs, as private insurers will have to compete with the government plan.
If we narrow those eligible for the government plan to those who have no alternative, nothing's going to change.
August 3, 2009 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Borgen Project has some good information on the cost of addressing global poverty (www.borgenproject.org).
It only takes $30 billion annually to end world hunger!
Yet... we are spending $550 billion annually on the defense budget.
August 3, 2009 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Charles Schumer: public opton needs to meet criteria of "being available to every American."
The House bill doesn't allow people who already get insurance from an employer to supplement that by joining the public option.
The House bill also stops employers with 25+ employees from choosing the public option, unless the employer has special permission.
So is Schumer saying he disagrees with those aspects of the House bill?
August 3, 2009 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink