TPMDC

Schumer Pushes Dem-Only Health Care Bill--But Are His Colleagues Game?


Sen Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

As hope wanes that Congress will be able to reach a bipartisan health care reform compromise, key figures have slowly trickled forward to endorse, or at least nod at, the idea that Democrats should pass health care reform on their own, and the man leading the push appears to be Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

But is he having an impact behind the scenes?

The media began focusing on the issue a week ago after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's spokesman Jim Manley announced that Democrats were committed to passing a bill "by any legislative means necessary." But two weeks before that, Schumer surprised some colleagues by declaring, on a conference call with reporters, that Democrats "will have contingencies in place" in the event that bipartisan negotiations go nowhere.

He was referring to budget reconciliation legislation, which can not be filibustered, and can in theory be used to pass certain health care reforms.

On Meet the Press this Sunday, he told David Gregory that Democrats are "considering alternatives" including "getting 60 Democratic votes and maybe an occasional Republican here or there on a bill [and] looking at reconciliation."

And, according to Greg Sargent, "Schumer has also told colleagues he believes political work has to be done in advance to sell "reconciliation" by persuading voters that the GOP is wholly opposed to reform of any."

The questions now are, how many colleagues is he pushing, and how receptive are they to his suggestions? In other words, is he going to be able to pull enough Democrats together to get the party to switch gears completely and back a Democrat only solution to the health care impasse?

So far, the Democrats endorsing the tactic include Schumer himself, and other surrogates including Howard Dean, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle. However, repeated inquiries by TPMDC to reform-oriented senators on the question of bucking bipartisanship have gone unanswered.

Comments (14) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

August 25, 2009 11:45 AM   

"As hope wanes that Congress will be able to reach a bipartisan health care reform compromise..." Excuse me?? There was NEVER even the remotest chance of such a thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 2:07 PM    in reply to Steve LaBonne

Exactly.  Brian is confusing reality with the kabuki-theater dance that our politicians are playing out.  When he writes, "as hope wanes," the implicit assumption that such hope had been sincerely held by anybody involved is absurd.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 11:54 AM   

The party of 'NO" has never been about bi-partisanship...Schumers buddies better get ready---83% of the American people want reform and the 'public option'....If they do not get on board with the American voter--it will be a blood bath on both sides of the aisle in 2010..New BLOOD IS ALWAYS GOOD and one third of the voting public is independent! call the fools and remind them that they were elected to do the work of the people not the insurance corps and the lobbyists. 1.800.828. 0498!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 12:05 PM   

The Republicans went with the "51 is fine" math for many years. If we want to have an impact we will need to do the same for awhile.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 1:43 PM   

"Democrats are "considering alternatives" including "getting 60 Democratic votes""

I'm sorry, but seriously, what the fuck? When did Bush EVER have trouble rounding up the necessary votes from his own party?

And why isn't the party making sure that the Liebermans and Nelsons face the consquences of defying the will of the people and the party?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

wyt

user-pic

August 25, 2009 3:38 PM    in reply to brewmn61

It's not necessarily a strength to have your field committed to monoculture. Short term, you can get strong crop yields, as the Republicans in the past have. But when disease strikes your single variety, as madness has struck the current Republicans to the last man (although perhaps not to the last two women), it's over.

The more complex ecologies are the stronger, the more resilient. The Republicans have a monoculture; the Democrats have more complexity than that. This is not a weakness. The oft-occurring meme claiming it is is almost entirely unfortunate, misleading, and wrong.

And to the degree Democrats take this meme to heart, it will weaken the party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:26 PM   

Looks to me like Schumer is the real Senate Majority Leader! Go for it, Chuck!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:36 PM   

Yeah, what exactly is the point of this story, and why is it given the placement it has? You haven't heard back from anybody yet. Why not wait until you get some actual, reliable quotes or background that tells you either Schumer's persuading people or not? You have Rahm acknowledging the GOP is obstructing, indications from the White House that it's preparing a Dems-only plan, Schumer going on MTP to say that Dems are considering alternatives, Schakowsky and Daschle, who have the ear of the president, indicating the idea is favorable, and Harry Reid himself pushing the "any means necessary" idea. That sounds a bit like a coordinated message. Strange for Democrats, I know, but apparent nonetheless.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

wyt

user-pic

August 25, 2009 3:42 PM    in reply to jerryfatheart

Schumer's no minor player. He's past DSCC chair. He plays the media well. He's senior senator from a major state.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:46 PM    in reply to wyt

Oh I'm not denying that. But this isn't a story as it stands now. It would be if there were evidence that Schumer wasn't persuading people or if he was. Stories should tell, not ask.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:55 PM   

The way to sell reconciliation is to merely point out the GOP's serial, rampant lies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:56 PM   

If the DEMs were to use reconciliation to pass a reform Bill, if the Bill does not deliver a public option with reduced premiums, reduced deductibles, increased acccess, the DEMs will not be able to spin this as a win. Health Care is one issue that EVERYONE deals with every month as an out of household budget item. It is not some abstract political argument. It effects everyone on the pocketbook level and no amount of spin, lies or marketing will convince Americans it is reform unless it is REAL REFORM.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 3:57 PM    in reply to xargaw

Right on. Seriously, if you're going to use reconiciliation, then why not have the public option?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 4:10 PM   

Just do it already. Enough with these games. Demorcrat president, Democrat congress, just get the job done, for crying out loud.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on