The Sunday Show Line-Ups
Here are the line-ups for the Sunday talk shows this weekend:
• ABC, This Week: Sec. of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius; Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT).
• CBS, Face The Nation: White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs; Former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE); Former Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-IN); Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley.
• CNN, State Of The Union: Sec. of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius; James Carville and Mary Matalin.
• Fox News Sunday: Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL); American Medical Association president J. James Rohack; AARP executive vice president John Rother.
• NBC, Meet The Press: Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX), now the head of FreedomWorks; Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK); Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD); MSNBC host Rachel Maddow; Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY); Chamber of Commerce executive vice president Bruce Josten; Gov. Bill Ritter (D-CO).


















Health Care lineups!
Steve Benen has a thought experiment
August 14, 2009 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
and...
• CNN, Fareed Zakaria GPS: Michael Oren, Israel's new Ambassador to the United States; Raila Odinga, Prime Minister of Kenya
August 14, 2009 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. The list is not complete without GPS. Indeed, the list really hasn't started if it doesn't have GPS.
August 14, 2009 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zakaria is the greatest. He should take over meet the press and give it some credibility again.
August 14, 2009 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rachel Maddow? I just might watch a Sunday show for the first time in many years. It's unfortunate that versus a chauvinist a-hole, a lunatic, and a corporate shill, she'll be outnumbered.
August 15, 2009 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good News !
A staff writer at The New Yorker and some experts have examined Medicare data from the successful hospitals of 10 regions, and they have found evidence that more effective, lower-cost care is possible. Thankfully, the provisions in the reform include more expansive policies than they have.
Please be 'sure' to visit http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/opinion/13gawande.html?hp for credible evidences !
Some have followed the Mayo model with salaried doctors employed, Other regions, too, have found ways to protect patients against the pursuit of revenues over patient.
And a cardiac surgeon of them said they had adopted electronic systems, examined the data and found that a shocking portion of tests were almost certainly unnecessary, possibly harmful.
According to analysis, their quality scores are well above average. Yet they spend more than $1,500 (16 percent) less per Medicare patient than the national average and have a slower real annual growth rate (3 percent versus 3.5 percent nationwide).
Surprisingly, 16 % of about $550 billion (the total of medicare cost per year) is around $88 billion per year, except for Medicaid (total cost of around $500 billion per year), medicare 'alone' can save $880 billion over the next decade.
In addition, under the reform package, along with the already allocated $583 billion, the wastes involving so called "doughnut hole" , the unnecessary subsidies for insurers, abuse, exorbitant costs by the tragic ER visits etc are weeded out, the concern over revenue (below) might be a thing of the past.
(( Net Medicare and Medicaid savings of $465 billion + the $583 billion revenue package = $1048 billion - the previously estimated $1.042 trillion cost of reform = $6 billion surplus - $245 billion (the 10-year cost of adjusting Medicare reimbursement rates so physicians don’t face big annual pay cuts) = the estimated deficit of $239 billion ))
In modernized society, the business lacking IT system is unthinkable just like pre-electricity period, nevertheless, the last thing to expect is happening now in the sector requiring the best accuracy in respect to dealing with human lives. Apparently the errors by no e-medical records have spawned the crushing lawsuits (Medical malpractice lawsuits cost at least $150 billion per year), and these costs have led to the unnecessary tests, treatments, even more profits so far. And in different parts of the U.S., patients get two to three times as much care for the same disease, with the same result.
Thank You !
August 16, 2009 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink