
Talking points, distributed to employees of UnitedHealth Group argue against a public option. "Our company is very concerned that a government-run health plan would be a road block to meaningful health care reform. It would significantly increase costs for individuals and families, would add billions of dollars in new liabilities to the federal budget, would break down the current health care system upon which more than 160 million Americans rely, and would violate the President's commitment that those who like their current coverage can keep it," the memo reads.
In a letter from UHG, obtained by TPM, employees are encouraged to communicate this and other views directly to members of Congress at town hall events. As TPM reported yesterday, a source who obtained the letter says UHG directed him to an anti-health care reform tea party outside of the office of Rep. Zack Space (D-OH). UHG denies that report.
You can read all the talking points below the fold. According to Ben Smith of Politico, these are the talking points cited in the UHG letter.
- UnitedHealth Group supports bipartisan, comprehensive health care modernization. * Our company is playing a constructive role in the health care modernization discussion, engaging with the Administration, Congress and industry leaders in support of sustainable reform that will slow future health care cost growth while still delivering quality medical coverage.
- Our industry has been innovators in developing best practices that achieve this goal - these include efforts from far-reaching administrative reforms that slash paperwork to initiatives that reduce medical errors, all to ensure that doctors and hospitals can focus on patient care.
- UnitedHealth Group, in partnership with physicians, hospitals and other care providers, has developed proven initiatives that government could undertake today to slow future health care cost growth, including institutional preadmission programs to manage illnesses and prevent avoidable hospitalizations, clinical evidence-based care management tools, and rewards for physicians for providing comprehensive medical care. It is critical that sustainable health care reform be passed that will not only expand coverage and improve quality, but also will slow the growth of health care costs.
- Our industry's proposal for health reform brings everyone into the system, guarantees coverage for all Americans, does away with pre-existing condition limitations, and ends ratings based on health status and gender.
- The approximately 75,000 men and women of our company work passionately every day to help people lead healthier lives.
- Our company is very concerned that a government-run health plan would be a road block to meaningful health care reform. It would significantly increase costs for individuals and families, would add billions of dollars in new liabilities to the federal budget, would break down the current health care system upon which more than 160 million Americans rely, and would violate the President's commitment that those who like their current coverage can keep it.
- We are committed to the enactment of a uniquely American approach to health care reform and bipartisan reforms that build upon what is currently working and that ensure those who like their current coverage can keep it.
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
August 20, 2009 12:53 PM
Ran it though the Google Talking Points to English translator.
Translation: We support a plan that transfers government dollars into our pockets but preserves our status as a monopoly or oligopolist in the markets . where we do business.
Translation: We are spending millions and millions of our insured's premium dollars lobbying Congress like crazy, funding scary commercials full of distortions and lies and astroturf and sending you out with this pack of lies because we are desperate to preserve our status as a monopoly or oligopololist in the areas where we do business.Translation: Rest assured that before we raised your premiums to support our bloated executive compensation and adminisrative overhead costs, we cut costs as much as we thought we could get away with.
Translation: We are very much for any plan that transfers taxpayer money into our wallets as long as it doesn't entail even the slightest prospect of competition or is otherwise disruptive to our status as monopolists or oligopolists in every market we serve. Our terror of competition is spurring us to make half-hearted cosmetic efforts at cost containment and to be more discreet about how we crush people who get illnesses that will cost us a lot of money.
Translation: We are absolutely peeing in our pants in terror at the prospect of actual competition by a company whose objective is to provide health care coverage rather than to pay bloated salaries and bonueses to its executives because our decades as a monopoly or oligopolist in every market we serve has left us bloated and sluggish and incapable of competing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
heraldsquare
August 20, 2009 3:25 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Health care premiums paid for that lobbying effort, which just proves that the premiums are higher than they need to be to provide health care.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
daveincolorado
August 20, 2009 1:50 PM
My employer provides my health care insurance (although not for free) which happens to be United Health Care (low bid). I would love to drop it for another company that is not so blatantly anti-reform, but that would mean changing docs, since my only other choice - a choice I have only once a year - is Kaiser (or nothing, I guess). Alternatively, I would like to write them a nasty letter telling them to lay off the anti-reform antics and stop biasing the argument through their control of the Lewin Group. But I'm afraid I would get my insurance cancelled or would start having major hassles with any claims. Can't win.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
August 20, 2009 3:08 PM
SOP for unethical businesses. I worked for a small town bank in the 1970s - Dow Chemical wanted a nuclear power plant - some folks opposed it. The bank officers handed out pro-nukes buttons and told us all to wear them. I refused, and was told, 'It's part of your job.' (I told them that was illegal, and if they wanted to fire me for refusing to wear it I would be happy to see them in court. I never wore it.)
Turns out the site was unsafe, and for once the forces of good won - the plant was never built (and Dow didn't go out of business.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brooklyn Democrat
August 20, 2009 4:26 PM
Google United Health Care fines. They're facing up to $1.3 billion in fines from the State of California.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MAX TARDCORE
August 20, 2009 4:36 PM
The woman hoisting the blue "No OBAMACARE" sign is absolutely bonkers. You know from the dress.
Crazy Cat Lady.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
spytheweb
August 25, 2009 11:37 AM
Singler payer HR 676, blows every other plan out of the water. Saves billions and covers everyone.
Check out some of the tremendous benefits that the new Medicare will bring and see what you think:
Every resident of the US will be covered from birth to death.
No more pre-existing conditions to be excluded from coverage.
No more expensive deductibles or co-pays.
All prescription medications will be covered.
All dental and eye care will be included.
Mental health and substance abuse care will be fully covered.(1)
Long term and nursing home services will be included.
You will always choose your own doctors and hospitals.
Costs of coverage will be assessed on a sliding scale basis.
Tremendously simplified system of medical administration.
Total portability – your coverage not tied to any job or location.
Existing Medicare benefits for those over 65 will be vastly improved.
No corporate bureaucrat will ever come between you and your Doctor to deny your care.
http://www.hr676.org/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?