Vitter Web Ad: My Opponent Voted For Government Health Care! (He Actually Voted Against The Health Care Bill)
Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) has a new Web ad against his likely Democratic opponent Charlie Melancon, attacking the Dem for voting for government-run health care. The fun part here is that Melancon is a Blue Dog who voted against the current health care bill in the committee:
Vitter's ad uses as its citations two votes by Melancon, against amendments offered by Republican House members that would have presumably limited government health care in some fashion or another, using this as a vote in favor of government health care.
"It's odd that David Vitter put out an ad attacking Charlie for voting for government-run health care," Louisiana Dem spokesman Kevin Franck told TPM, "when I get a lot of calls complaining that Charlie voted against government-run health care."
Franck also put out a press release with a rather suggestive line: "Maybe David Vitter has been pampered so much by the company of those who are paid to agree with him, that he can't tell the difference between the truth and a lie." Franck had no comment when asked whether he was endorsing certain rumors.


















Well, if the Republicans are going to accuse you of voting for reform no matter what you do, you might as well vote for it in the real world.
August 13, 2009 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Melancon ought to find and purchase news archive footage of Vitter admitting to his patronizing hookers and just replay it, endlessly.
Only because his nickname in the brothels, "Vitter the shitter", won't make it onto broadcast. Standards, you know. Must protect the little ones...
August 13, 2009 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The question is how would stormy daniels have voted?
August 13, 2009 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did nobody else notice the specific wording, "David Vitter has been pampered"?
Kudos to Kevin Franck!
August 13, 2009 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink