White House Strongly Denies It's Given Up On The Public Option
The White House has strengthened its denial that the administration's non-committal position on the public option has changed one way or another.
"Here's the bottom line: Absolutely nothing has changed," said Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
"We continue to support the public option. That will help lower costs, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurers honest. If people have other ideas about how to accomplish these goals, we'll look at those, too. But the public option is a very good way to do this."
Over the weekend, President Obama referred to the public option as a "sliver" of health care reform, and Sebelius said the public option wasn't essential reform's success. Though the White House's core position hasn't changed, the intensity with which it supports the public option has varied over the last several weeks, and this weekend's remarks were the first indication that the administration doesn't even regard the public option as particularly crucial.
But White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs insists that Sebelius' statements were not a trial balloon. "If it was a signal, it was a dog whistle we started blowing three months ago, and it just got picked up," Gibbs said. "It's crazy. It's not a signal."


















Pushback works. They heard us.
August 18, 2009 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Thank goodness everyone didn't run and jump off the cliff after the Chicken Littles HuffPo and Maddow declared it dead. Thank goodness for Anthony Weiner and the other progressives in the House. Thank goodness for Rockefeller and Feingold and Pelosi. Thank goodness the White House seems to be listening.
August 18, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect, don't be so smug. You bet your ass it was a "trial balloon". Just because the Obama WH says it wasn't... well, who can prove it, one way or another, right? Don't make me defend trolls, who would argue that Obama fans are so blinded by the love of a cool man, that they think that he would never in a million years "work" them.
The reason we're all so happy and relieved and singing Kumbaya today over this latest WH emission, is that they came to it because Rachel and HuffPo sat on them!. Fast and hard. Had everyone simply kept their mouths shut, instead of raising the stink to which you obviously object... the whole national conversation since about Friday would have been dominated by that POS lobbyist whore Kent Conrad (who represents six-point-one human beings in ND, and still has our national health care policy's balls in his fist... for reasons of which I'm still not certain). Or maybe Grassley... I swear to God, this asshat has never gotten this much television exposure in his life!
Rachel and Arianna took the fucking conversation back for you. On your knees, dunderheads.
August 18, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, all they did was reinforce a MSM talking point that it was dead, which it wasn't. In danger? Yes. It was just more of that same old sky is falling concern trolling that many of my fellow liberals have fallen prey to. Instead of fighting back, which the progressives in the House and Senate did, HuffPo and Maddow, whom I usually love, were eager to play the betrayed party yet again.
And where did I say it WASN'T a trial balloon? All I did was second Tom Wells' statement that pushback works. HuffPo and Maddow weren't pushing back, they were conceding defeat.
August 18, 2009 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Took the conversation back by aiding the MSM in conveying the notion that the "public option is dead?" Arianna and Maddow got played by the AP and now the White House is trying to save this progressive goal from a self-inflicted bullet wound.
I was amazed to see how many "progressives" were willing to declare the PO dead in exchange for an opportunity to bitch and moan.
August 18, 2009 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bingo!
August 18, 2009 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes!
Now back to original problem:
The only thing that matters -- getting to 50 in the Senate:
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/08/how-many-votes-does-public-option-have.html
WH on board, House on board, we have about 5 more Senators to get on board.
August 18, 2009 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's an interesting post. Actually looks doable, just need Baucus and Begich on board and it's got fifty.
August 18, 2009 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too bad Baucus is working hand in glove with that obstructionist Grassley to kill the bill by delay, delay, delay.
August 18, 2009 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's pretty much done now. Hopefully Baucus will now let us rip the bill from his cold dead hands and put it through the conference committee wringer. But, obviously, without the public option...
August 18, 2009 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad you got the first comment in, Tom.
On the mark.
August 18, 2009 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. But pressure is still need on this W.H.
August 18, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
No it didn't. Nothing had ever changed. This is the exact same thing they've been saying from the beginning. He's committed to the end result and the public option is a means to the end. If there's another way to achieve the same end, he's open to it, but it's the end that's important, not the means.
This whole brouhaha was nothing more than the news media parsing his remarks and trying to generate a controversy and a lot of people hyperventilating over it.
What they're saying today is exactly the same as they've said all along. It's about the ends, not the means.
August 18, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
How they must laugh at us.
Forget it Gibbs, people will just believe what they want to believe. There are already hundreds of blogs saying you did drop the public option even after your first clarification. You're wasting time - so next question.
August 18, 2009 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about if someone in the White house master Messaging 101?
AND, stop trying to placate Republicans!! They won't vote for anything. Drop the bipartisanship already! It's a fools errand!
August 18, 2009 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, we're laughing at YOU, for believing every word a politician's press secretary says. Tom Wells, above, got it right.
But apparently nothing will convince some blind Obama supporters that just like any other politician he responds to pressure, and that we need to make sure all the pressure isn't coming from the right.
August 18, 2009 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
God bless you, Steve LaBonne! You GET it. All I've been reading here today, is how silly we all were for doubting them, see?
WORD, about all the pressure not coming from the right! Village wisdom dictates that we progressives have no pressure to bring to bear, and no media with which to do it.
Oh, I dunno. We sort of elected the sonofabitch and gave him a Dem Congress. Conventional wisdom, if memory serves, was that America would never elect (you gotta be kidding!) a Black guy, who was ostensibly (eeek!) LIBRUL.
And as for the Congress, you'll recall that the highly-paid commentator Karl Rove instructed us all that we were going to have a "permanent Republican majority". Hey. He had "THE math", remember?
KIDS... THERE IS NO END TO THE SHIT WE CAN DO! Stop beating up your Left flank, because they're simply the best goddamned friends the ungrateful Democratic Party has ever had! And therefore, THEY should set national policy (... and Blue Dogs need to be primaried into fucking oblivion).
August 18, 2009 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
They should start saying they're prepared to give up on the private option, and rally around the public option.
August 18, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
tpmgary - You've got the right message:
DOWN WITH THE PRIVATE OPTION!
(but then where would all our senators and congresspeople get their millions of dollars? oh, well; i'm sure they can find another industry that wants to buy their votes!)
August 18, 2009 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm so fed up with politicians fattening their wallets at our expense.
If they want to threaten to drop the public option, we should all threaten to drop the private option.
Two can play this game.
We underestimate the power we as Americans have. We are consumers, after all--and consider this: we are the only consumers the health insurance industry can offer its products to. (It's not like there's a global demand for private insurance--virtually ever other country has some version of universal health care, or single payer.)
August 18, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, this seems like lofty naivette. I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. What do you mean by "two can play at this game?" If they drop the public option (which they are not), we'll answer the government by dropping our healthcare? I don't see that as likely, in any case...The point is to provide competition to curb exorbitant charges from private insurers.
August 18, 2009 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love it!
August 18, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if it's Tuesday they must be for it.
Promise us the moon and give us a steaming pile of...
Buh bye Democratic Party. I am so done with you.
August 18, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't prejudge. Wait until they come through - or not. If you give up now, we all lose. We need to stand together in our resolve to stand by the party just until and if it fails to deliver a strong public option. We are the backbone of the party. Stiffen up.
It's not about the posturing now. It's about the results then. The sky hasn't fallen yet. There may yet be a rainbow. The enemies of health care want us to surrender hope now. Don't be their pawn.
August 18, 2009 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll continue to support the issues and individual progressive candidates - whom I expect to be Democrats.
But the party itself? Dead to me. At the upper reaches it's really nothing more than a power clique whose focus is to preserve and expand their own power and wealth. This is the voice of experience talking, from a former yellow dog.
The likes of Max Baucus, Kent Conrad and Ben Nelson (and others) couldn't care less about the party or the values we all think it stands for. They just take from it and don't give back. The system promotes opportunists, not idealists.
August 18, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nah, don't be "done with them" just yet. We've already proven that they can be successfully bitch-slapped into compliance, so let's just stay with that plan, okay?
Besides... ya can't do that, with Republicans.
August 18, 2009 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no doubt that the White House did this as a trial balloon, to see just how much trouble they would be in if they truly did negotiate away the public option. Our passionate response to that and, most likely, some quick polls showed them that there really is very strong support for the public option, and health care reform without is it just business as usual. To expect them to admit this would really be naive.
We should have learned from this that applying pressure works, at least to some extent. So, let us up the pressure.
August 18, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perceptually, the White House is spending way too much time saying what they will not do!
August 18, 2009 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Either this was a backstabbing trial balloon or they are incompetently off-message. Neither is a good sign.
August 18, 2009 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, it's a 'sliver' he supports. YAY!
August 18, 2009 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a feeling that this "sliver" posturing was Obama's way of trying to mollify right-leaning independents by showing that reform wasn't based entirely on public option and so keeping the debate away from it. If so, that was a miscalculation because now it's the whole debate. Ironically, it's now a great opportunity for reformers to seize control of the debate, much like Weiner and Dean have been doing. Fine, let's talk about the public option. Let's be up front about what it's all about. And if people still oppose it after then, they're either not paying attention, obtuse or Palinists.
August 18, 2009 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like the theory. Though it's a talking point that's been building for weeks now. And seems more directed at getting people to accept a bill without a public option. They're doing everything possible to diminish its importance and doing nothing to slap down the co-op red herring.
August 18, 2009 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is why I think that if there is a co-op instead of a public option, it will very much be this "co-op in name only" the GOP has already jumped on. In other words, a powerful, strictly regulated one with an initial federal and investment and explicit backing, with a trigger to convert to a full public option if a certain measure of cost control isn't achieved within a few years.
August 18, 2009 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Might be. Just depends on who caves in Conference committee, and on whose side the administration decides to fight. Right now they seem to be fighting progressives behind the scenes as best as they can.
August 18, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty much everyone got this wrong by (mind?) reading into what Sebelius and Obama said. The media have such a hard time getting anything right. It was only a couple of months ago that lefty bloggers didn't even know that there was going to be a public option and were freaking out over it. Of course, it is important for your Reps to know that you know that we MUST have a solid public option in the bill.
Watch here if you want to know what is going to happen:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/8/17/768013/-Howard-Dean-schools-Morning-Joe-on-public-option-strategy-(UPDATED-wvideosaction-item)
August 18, 2009 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, it's not enough for the HHS and press secretary to reaffirm the president's support for the public option. We need to hear it straight from the president's mouth. I'm fed up with the inconsistencies and the mix messages coming from the W.H.
August 18, 2009 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that now we will relax -- until the next time. And believe me, there will be a next time.
We must not relax. We must keep the pressure on; let them KNOW in no uncertain terms that a ROBUST public option is non-negotiable, and not one of many options.
Another thing, the more we applaud this man (Obama) the more contempt he has for us; indeed, the more the Republicans abuse him, the more he yields to them and tries to placate them.
We should learn something from that. Maybe he has a self esteem problem.
August 18, 2009 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Many reformers recognized roughly 30 percent of all health-care spending in the U.S. -some $700 billion a year- might be wasted on unnecessary tests and treatments, and payment reform could solve this problem. Is this claim overstatement ? Please not to fear quitting drug !
Provided the American people pay around double the amount of efficient systems, the result is still well below them, the ratio of waste might be estimated to far more than 50% in the U.S.
Let's be conservative regarding the ratio. If 10% of savings apply to the combined Medicare and Medicaid cost of $923.5bn per year, as of July, the savings of $923.5bn over the next decade are possible.
And when these savings add to the already allocated $583 billion, the savings of wastes involving so called "doughnut hole" , the unnecessary subsidies for insurers, abuse, exorbitant costs by the tragic ER visits etc, the concern over revenue might be a thing of the past.
As a matter of fact, with the promising redesign in the pipeline, some patient-focused clinics in 10 regions have already achieved 16% of savings in Medicare while their quality scores are well above average.
Please be 'sure' to visit http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/opinion/13gawande.html?hp for credible evidences !
Thankfully, the provisions in the reform include more expansive, systematic policies including 'a patient's outcome-based payment system' than they have. I for one firmly believe this American innovation, 'a patient's outcome-based payment system' , is capable of turning profit-oriented practices into patient-focused system / value.
Dr. Armadio at Mayo clinic says, "If we got rid of that stuff (waste), we save a third of all that we spend and that is 2.5 trillion dollars on health care. A third of that and that is 700 billion dollars a year. That covers a lot of uninsured people."
Please visit http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=820455&catid=391 for detailed infos
Thank You !
August 18, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we finally put "Bipartisanship" in the coffin? No matter what's in the bill, the Repubs are voting against it. Keep the public option, bring the Dems together and do what the majority of the electorate voted you into office for.
August 18, 2009 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jonathan Alter, Newsweek:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/212162
August 18, 2009 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
August 18, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
More disturbing than the President's "sliver" comment, was its context. In the town hall, the questioner asked, "How can private insurers compete with a government entity?" And instead of answering the question, President Obama started talking about how the Public Option wasn't really very important in the overall scheme of things. Why didn't the President simply answer the question?
For example, private insurers could compete by reducing outrageous executive compensation (e.g. compare the salaries of the VA head with the head of United Healthcare). Private insurers could compete by reducing the amount of money they spend on ads and marketing campaigns. Private insurers could compete by cutting back on bloated staff. Private companies could compete by -- gosh -- offering value-added services. There are zillions of ways to answer the question. So why the cop-out?
August 18, 2009 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not spending enormous sums weeding out any applicant who might conceivably get sick.
Not having panels of doctors scouring records of anyone who does get really sick looking for some flaw in their application that could be used as an excuse for denying coverage.
Adopting a common claims form and electronic submission so that doctors wouldn't have to employ an army of people to cope with a dizzying array of forms and rules.
We could go on all day.
August 18, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
exactly...
August 18, 2009 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
For more info on why we NEED a public option
see
http://tuftsroundtable.org/blog/21st-century-sagas/273-need-a-good-laugh-idea-that-co-operatives-can-replace-public-option-is-just-lolz
August 18, 2009 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm beginning to get whiplashed by this.
August 18, 2009 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama folds like a cheap suit at the slightest push from a discredited GOP minority. Reid is his political twin who allows Baucus and Grassley to hijack health care legislation from the 60-40 Democratic senate to a 3-3 committee panel.
Where are the big blue state senators??? Why aren't they asserting themselves? It's unbelievable. It's incredible. It's the fatally wimpy, spineless, gutless Democratic party.
And don't be fooled by cooperatives. They are a trojan horse to kill a real public option. Don't let Obama sell this fraud as real health care reform.
August 18, 2009 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing has happened, sorry. I understand that you're really excited about health care failing because then you'll get to bitch and moan about how you've been betrayed... but President Obama still wants a public option, even if he's not using his magic pony wand to magically bypass archaic legislative processes.
August 18, 2009 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The official get any sort of health care reform passed, season has begun. For Obama and his flunkies, any deal is a good deal that keeps him from appearing to fail in achieving his signature issue.
Can we get a mulligan on the Democratic primaries?
August 18, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another good example of the true motivations behind the constant, hyperbolic Obama-bashing. The fight for a public option goes on, PUMA, whether you like it or not.
August 18, 2009 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not so sure that Obama's folding. I think he's tougher than a lot of folks give him credit for, and I think he's got a lot of steel in him.
I hear he's going to be meeting with the Clinton's next week - both Hils and Bill. Now for sure, he's gonna talk to them about their various tours overseas and get briefed on what all happened - and he'll thank Bill for getting those journalists out of Korea ... but what else will they all talk about?
Maybe health care, ya think? ... Hils knows that end of it, she's knowlegable and she's tough. Maybe they'll talk about the Blue Dog Dems (mostly from the south) and the opposition those guys are putting up against health care reform. And ya know, then I think ... who's the wiliest, toughest hombre around who's also a southerner - and who's got a history of bending arms and rub noses into shit and playing mean? Ya think Bill Clinton qualifies? Would Obama's health care bill pass if "somebody" like Bill got the Blue Dogs on side?
I dunno, maybe yes, maybe no -- but I sit here wondering -- and I just got a feeling Obama's got something up his sleeve. This meeting ain't JUST for a debriefing, I'm sure. The fat lady ain't sung yet.
August 18, 2009 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to think he's got more stones than he's showing but then he gets all professorial and runs this debate like it's a salon or something.
His Chief of Staff is Rahm Emmanuel, who has no love for liberals or liberal issues. They're letting Baucus and Grassley kill the bill.
When do we start judging Obama on his actions instead of our hopes?
August 18, 2009 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could we be witnessing trial balloons being launched. Maybe this was an exercise to see how much more support the healthcare reform were to get if the public option was eliminated, and since the reception from the Republican side was tepid at best, the trial balloon was popped and everything is back to where it was Saturday.
August 18, 2009 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The one upside to this is that it has fired up the left. A few months ago, half the people screaming bloody murder now were shrieking about the dismissal of single-payer. We'll see if this new-found support for the public optionn lasts or if it fades the moment a new microscandal comes along to offend the netroots' delicate sensibilities.
If there's one thing the White House has learned over the past few months, it's that there's little upside to listening to the left. Every good act is just ignored in favor of another esoteric call for purity. Why play along if you never get anything but suspicion and invective in return?
August 18, 2009 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fortunately, while the Stroszeks of the world have been busy hunting down disloyalty and heresy in whatever they choose to define as "the left", real people on the left and the netroots, like Jane Hamsher and nyceve at FDL, DFA, and a host of others have been doing the actual work of both promoting the public option (even though they almost all prefer a "Medicare for All" single payer system) and calling out and publicizing recalcitrant "moderate" Democrats, beloved by the Stroszeks of the world, and working to generate a solid bloc of House progressives who have pledged to vote against any legislation without a strong public option.
To quote rep. Barney Frank, Stroszek, what planet do you spend most of your time on?
August 20, 2009 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could we be witnessing trial balloons being launched. Maybe this was an exercise to see how much more support the healthcare reform were to get if the public option was eliminated, and since the reception from the Republican side was tepid at best, the trial balloon was popped and everything is back to where it was Saturday.
August 18, 2009 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could we be witnessing trial balloons being launched. Maybe this was an exercise to see how much more support the healthcare reform were to get if the public option was eliminated, and since the reception from the Republican side was tepid at best, the trial balloon was popped and everything is back to where it was Saturday.
August 18, 2009 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now the WH - Obama in particular - need to go in front of the people and specifically say, strongly, that the public option is essential to the success of the health insurance reform legislation and that he will not approve any bill that doesn't have it. Single payer would be better, but....
He can't have his spokespeople saying it for him; he needs to unequivocably speak out so there is no future misunderstanding.
August 18, 2009 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Maddow -- she's one sharp cookie cutter -- but I stopped watching her last year during the election when she was so depressingly pessimistic about Obama winning, up to and until he did. Snarky cynical pessimism is her MO, not easy to swallow on a daily basis. I happened to catch her show yesterday while channel-surfing and she was bemoaning the death of the PO because of what Sibelius said -- I nearly threw the remote at my TV! It ain't dead! Congress is on vacation! I kept yelling this at my TV, but she wouldn't listen -- and I'll never watch her show again.
August 18, 2009 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink