
In response to the release of Sen. Max Baucus' health care reform bill, Sen. Roland Burris (D-IL) became the first Senator today to say he will vote against any health care bill that does not include a public option.
"I firmly believe in a public option and will oppose any bill that does not include one," Burris said. "Illinoisans have seen their insurance premiums skyrocket, while more and more families lose their coverage every day."
You can read the entire statement below the fold. Obviously, there's a huge difference between opposing health care reform without a public option, and voting no on cloture (i.e. supporting a filibuster) on a bill without a public option. In fact, with the Senate numbers being what they are, the difference is crucial, and if Burris is suggesting the latter, it could have a tremendous impact on health care negotiations going forward. I've put in calls to his staff for clarity on that point, and will report back when I learn more.
"I firmly believe in a public option and will oppose any bill that does not include one. Illinoisans have seen their insurance premiums skyrocket, while more and more families lose their coverage every day."
"We need real reform now. The inclusion of a public option as a central component to any healthcare reform legislation is the only way to create meaningful competition with the insurance companies, and in turn, bring down costs and improve quality of care for the people of Illinois and all Americans.
"Following President Obama's healthcare speech last week, there is a great deal of momentum to fix the healthcare crisis, and I am committed to working with the White House, Senate leadership, and my colleagues to achieve consensus and to affect change on this critical issue. I am confident we will pass this legislation before the end of the year, and I look forward to casting my vote in the United States Senate for a healthcare reform bill that includes a public option."
AJM
September 16, 2009 6:31 PM
Voting his conscience with nothing to lose. I hope more Senators have the balls to join him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 16, 2009 6:45 PM in reply to AJM
Conscience is something you should never mention in the same sentence with Roland Burris. If he had a conscience he never would have accepted an appointment from Rod Blagojevich.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
September 16, 2009 6:52 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
But being the first senator to insist on the Public Option would look great on his tombstone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 16, 2009 6:54 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
ROFLMAO! Have you seen the "tombstone"?
http://chamay0.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/burris1_oconnor.jpg
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 16, 2009 7:02 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
Blago had the legal power to appoint someone. Burris probably figured he was better than the next person Blago might appoint. Blago could definitely find someone -- you supply the other names -- to take the position.
In this instance Burris is acting for the good of the nation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
September 16, 2009 11:17 PM in reply to AJM
Roland Burris acts for the good of Roland Burris. If it also happens to be for the good of the nation, bonus. But don't think for a second he's doing it because he's taking a principled stand. It's a stunt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Karl the Marxist
September 17, 2009 5:24 AM in reply to Orlando
If he sticks to his guns, does not matter if it is a stunt or not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 8:53 AM in reply to Orlando
That's pretty cynical Orlando. Burris didn't have to say boo, he's not running again anyway. This helps us in IL put pressure on Durbin who has wavered more than once when he should be out front as senate whip pushing the option. If we get a lot more Dem senators on record taking the same stand it'll push Baucus plan into the garbage bin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
September 17, 2009 5:09 PM in reply to markg8
I'll cop to being cynical where Roland Burris is concerned. You could have knocked me over with a feather when he said he wouldn't run in 2010. Now, I think he was pressured into announcing he wouldn't run and he sees this declaration as his way back into the race. If I'm wrong, I'll admit it. But I'm anxious to see how it will play out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 5:16 PM in reply to Orlando
Nah, he doesn't have any money. That's what he told Blago's brother last fall. Said if his law partner didn't come back from NYC with some new legal clients they were going to close up shop by the end of 2008 and look for jobs. When he tried to raise some cash for the 2010 election he couldn't come up with more than $50,000. Alexi had over a million in the bank before he even started.
Burris may be crazy but he's not stupid enough to humiliate himself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
September 17, 2009 6:46 PM in reply to markg8
I can't believe you just said that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 6:55 PM in reply to Orlando
Let me revise and restate my remarks. Burris may be crazy but he's not stupid enough to humiliate himself twice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
September 17, 2009 7:27 PM in reply to markg8
We shall see.
It's not that I think he's utterly stupid--he's just not Mensa material. But sometimes people possess Achilles' heel personality traits that take over completely when the brain should be making decisions. Burris has one. It's ego.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 7:36 PM in reply to Orlando
When he came out with that statement a month or so ago "never say never, a lot of people tell me to hang on to that seat" he didn't mention money did he? He may have been hoping for a groundswell but there's no evidence of him raising or being able to raise cash. Nobody wants him as senator anymore and I doubt he could get anyone to introduce him at a rally let alone come out to see him at one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
September 17, 2009 8:48 PM in reply to markg8
I'm not suggesting he would win. He hasn't held statewide office since he lost the race for governor in 1994 and his term as attorney general expired in January of 1995. Nobody is giving him money and nobody is voting for him. But if he runs, it could get very, very ugly and Illinois could end up with another Peter Fitzgerald. Or even worse, an Oberweiss.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
September 17, 2009 8:50 PM in reply to Orlando
P.S. If he could win, I wouldn't care about him at all. Sure, he's a buffoon, but he's our buffoon. The problem is he wouldn't win.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 18, 2009 12:31 AM in reply to Orlando
I really like Giannoulias. The kid's smart, done some really good things as treasurer, has that whole Barack speaking style down pat and has a great career ahead of him. And it doesn't hurt that Illinois's junior senator would be playing basketball with the president of the US almost every weekend again like they used to do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
September 17, 2009 12:37 PM in reply to AJM
It takes nerve to vote against something you know is wrong for the people..Even though he has nothing to lose but a good conscience...Where we can vote the other knucle draggers out in 2010.
As a Dem- losely- every morning I get fundraising emails from the DSCC...My answer is always the same..'NOT A DIME TILL THEY DO THEIR JOB! that means a Bill for the people NOT THE CORPORATIONS!'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
September 16, 2009 6:43 PM
Roland Burris: Progressive Hero?
Hah! Politics makes strange bedfellows.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ted
September 16, 2009 7:35 PM
While he's easy to mock after the Blago debacle, I have to wonder how does he become the FIRST senator on record to insist on a public option? Where are the other senators?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
September 16, 2009 9:45 PM in reply to Ted
Schumer, Rockefeller, Sherrod Brown, Sanders, Feingold, Durbin, Leahy, Kerry are just a few senators who have already insisted on a public option.
I'm not getting this "Burris is the first" stuff.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
frankenheimer
September 17, 2009 9:29 AM in reply to FreeRider
I think it's because he's the first Senator to say he's not going to vote for a bill without a public option. It's more than just expressing support. The article also wonders if that means he would to filibuster it too. That would radically change the stakes, if true. Good for him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
September 17, 2009 1:21 PM in reply to FreeRider
Just more bad reporting.
Maybe he was the first AFTER the Baucus Bomb?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
September 16, 2009 7:53 PM
I am one of those folks who actually feel sorry for Burris. He really isn't a bad guy and so what if he jumped at the chance to be a senator. I know I am probably the only one who feels this way, but look, at least he is a sure vote for the President.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PaulC37943
September 16, 2009 7:58 PM
Good for Roland. I always figured he would vote right, regardless of the circumstances surrounding his appointment
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aunt Sam
September 16, 2009 8:25 PM
Remember, he is not running for re-election. How many other members of Congress would also stand up and speak out for quality and needed HCR if they weren't pandering for campaign donations and votes? Never mind, rhetorical query.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bearlegdairy
September 16, 2009 8:30 PM
THANKS ROLAND! I'M SURE THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE MOST TRUSTED MAN IN WASHINGTON WILL SWAY A LOT OF PEOPLE! Seriously, couldn't he have at least been the second senator to unequivocally state "public option or nothing." He does exactly have a lot of street cred with the American people. Props to the guy for doing it, but I'm not exactly sure how much it will help.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
September 16, 2009 8:50 PM
He's been very quiet. I rather feel sorry for Burris
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ru4862
September 17, 2009 9:19 AM
Good for Burris.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?