Earlier this week, Roland Burris (D-IL) became the first member of the Senate to definitively say he'll vote against health care reform legislation unless it includes a public option.
That's an important development, but, looking at the math in the Senate, it would be a really important development if Burris was saying he'd help filibuster the bill if it omitted a public option. So I asked for a bit of clarification from Burris' staff, and his spokesman Jim O'Connor said "the Senator was very serious in saying he will vote against any bill that doesn't include a public option."
But, he added, "[h]is goal is not to be an obstructionist, but as his statement said, to build consensus among his colleagues for a public option."
So it doesn't seem likely that he'd block a health care bill from coming to the floor for a vote over this issue. But he could still pave the way for other liberal senators to take a similarly strong stance. We'll keep an eye out for that.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

converse
September 18, 2009 1:58 PM
Brian, who, besides you, has suggested a strategy of dem senators voting to filibuster a dem bill approved by a dem president?
No, really, who?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
converse
September 18, 2009 4:47 PM in reply to converse
[***crickets***]
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
September 18, 2009 6:41 PM in reply to converse
It's really the stupidest thing I have read today. I would laugh in his face if he asked me that question.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
September 18, 2009 2:30 PM
RE-ELECT BURRIS!! (That's Roland, thinking.) Any port in a storm. (That's me.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Philv
September 18, 2009 4:04 PM in reply to wbgonne
Yeah, I can't imagine too many Senators take Burris very seriously at this point.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
September 18, 2009 6:41 PM in reply to Philv
He is a realiable progressive though. I really don't mind him in the Senate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 18, 2009 2:35 PM
So now the Public Option Purity Test has escalated to "Must pledge to actively abet Republican plan to regain the majority in Congress in 2010 by filibustering bill if it does not have a public option?" Wow. Missed that one. Can insisting that they pledge to urge the use of nuclear weapons on anyone who does not support the public option be far behind?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 18, 2009 6:31 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Strip them of their NATO membership.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
September 18, 2009 6:46 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
If the Democrats enact health care legislation without a public option they will and should get pummeled at the polls. They aren't kings who get fealty automatically. They must earn our support and respect. If they can't or won't deliver on health care, then it's time to look elsewhere.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 18, 2009 7:34 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Good luck on re-electing Obama if the bill is passed without public option and appears to cost middle class folks more money. Most probable outcome of current version.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?