During President Obama's speech tonight, some Republican House members were waving around their own bill -- to disprove the contention that the GOP doesn't have a plan of its own. It was announced as being an act of "silent protest," perhaps in contrast to the loud "You lie!" protest:

The bill from the Republcian Study Committee -- the caucus of hte most conservative members of the House GOP -- is available here.
A three-page summary shows that it is focused on promoting individually-owned insurance policies, while preserving employer-provided health care as an alternative with an opt-out clause.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Paul1950
September 9, 2009 10:16 PM
It is a good thing they used a lot of graphic and large fonts, or they would have been holding up a single sheet of paper.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RedMolly
September 9, 2009 10:40 PM in reply to Paul1950
Is that a cartoon on the cover page?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
East Coast Aussie
September 10, 2009 3:39 AM in reply to RedMolly
They had to fill in space somehow. The body of the bill is probably filled with 'rhubarb rhubarb'.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 9, 2009 10:26 PM
By their own logic, the minute the government is promoting one thing that means it intends to control your actions and deprive you of your other alternatives. So why are they trying to take employer-provided health care away?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Zell
September 9, 2009 10:34 PM
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bearlegdairy
September 10, 2009 1:01 AM in reply to Zell
I like potatoes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steaming Pile
September 10, 2009 9:51 AM in reply to Zell
I like eggs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
September 10, 2009 10:11 AM in reply to Zell
Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris
September 10, 2009 1:53 PM
Well, there's a little more to H.R. 3400 than just 'promoting individually-owned insurance'.
The bill also reinstates the Medicare 45% 'trigger' from Bush's 2003 bill. That is bad for effective Medicare reform in a number of ways: http://www.centeronbudget.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1143
It allows Insurance Companies to operate 'across state lines', thereby allowing them to set up shop in the least rigorously regulated markets.
To finance the bill, the Republican legislation consists of: reducing discretionary spending, rescinding unused funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as well as repealing large healthcare related chunks of that same stimulus including: "increased Medicaid funding, premium assistance for COBRA benefits, and Medicare and Medicaid health information technology funding."
http://covertheuninsured.org/legislative_bill/hr-3400-price
In addition: "Medicare and Medicaid disproportionate share hospital funding would be reduced if [the] bill results in a decrease in the rate of uninsured of more than 8 percentage points)." So, if the ranks of the uninsured are reduced by less than one tenth between 2010 and 2012, the Republicans would start hacking away at DSH funding which is so important for those hospitals who treat the most low-income Americans.
The only upside I can spot from the proposals are incentives to encourage more doctors to enter primary care, and reforms which demand insurance companies cannot deny coverage on the basis of pre-existing conditions.
At its core the bill seems to provide subsidies to the uninsured through tax credits, but, as you might expect, the subsidies seem too small (roughly $5,000 for a family, I think) and there is no indivual mandate to buy coverage. Malpractice compensation limits are in there (no surprises).
So, indeed, the bill they were waving about so proudly is concerned with encouraging an individual insurance market, and therefore attempting to create a 'radical' shift in the healthcare market (one President Obama believes would be detrimental to stability and health care security for millions of Americans).
And, as the President said: "don't pay attention to those scary stories about how your [Medicare] benefits will be cut, especially since some of the same folks who are spreading these tall tales have fought against Medicare in the past and just this year supported a budget that would essentially have turned Medicare into a privatized voucher program."
The bill those conservatives were waving around pretends to pay for itself in the long-term by slashing stimulus funding for Health IT and Medicaid, as well as putting pressure on government to make deep cuts into Medicare through an arbitary 45% trigger on general funds in the near future.
On some issues, there is a glimmer of promise, but otherwise its the same old, same old.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?