The Senate Finance Committee is back from lunch and picking up where it left off--debating an amendment by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) that would add a public option to Max Baucus' health care proposal.
1:55 p.m.: Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) doesn't like the public option...but he thinks all government officials and their staffs should be on it if the Democrats create one. A lot of Democrats oppose this ("it's a public option, including for us). But for what it's worth, the Senate HELP committee adopted an amendment that institutes this requirement, but only to members of Congress and their staffs.
2:03 p.m. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) notes smartly that any public option tied to Medicare will be tied to a newer, better Medicare that will correct for rural disparities, and reward providers that provide cost-effective care, and move away from fee for service. That undermines Kent Conrad's objection to a pretty significant extent. More on this soon.
2:09 p.m.Cantwell also says she'll be offering an amendment that will allow private insurers to team with the government to negotiate lower rates. Your move, Kent!
2:18 p.m.: Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) becomes (I think) the first senator of the day to cite the August town hall disruptions as evidence that, despite numerous polls showing this not to be the case, the public doesn't support the public option. Over the months, most data I've seen has support for the public option hovering between about 65 and 75 percent.
2:21 p.m.: Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) makes the point more clearly than any of his colleagues. The public option will not be an entitlement. It will be a government insurance plan that people pay for, at rates that will cover all the costs of the services provided. That's key--the law would have to be changed for the government to be able to subsidize it, and, therefore, for the plan to slip down the slope toward a tax-funded single payer system.
2:28 p.m.: Remember how John Ensign tried to argue that U.S. health care outcomes are great, and that life expectancy here would be higher than in other developed countries if it weren't for gunshot fatalities and car crashes and other Made in America peculiarities? Well, it turns out he got that statistic from serial health care liar Betsy McCaughey. And, like much of what she says, it has been debunked.
2:34 p.m.: It's almost as if John Cornyn wasn't listening when his colleague from Massachusetts was speaking. Quoting loosely, 'Why would you create a new government entitlement....' Old dogs, new tricks? Now he's grousing that private insurance won't get a fair shake...
2:41 p.m.: Baucus says there's a lot he likes about the Rockefeller amendment, but.... his first job is to get his bill "across the finish line" and as such he will oppose the amendment.
2:49 p.m.: Faced with the imminent demise of his public option proposal, Rockefeller lashes out at Republicans--and some Democrats--for their misrepresentations of his plan, and for their willingness to support the status quo.
"If you want a single payer system, just vote no." The vote will happen momentarily.
2:55 p.m.: The amendment failed by a vote of 8-15, with Sens. Max Baucus (D-MT), Kent Conrad (D-ND), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Tom Carper (D-DE), and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) voting with the Republicans.
Editor's Note: The previous TPMDC liveblog on the Senate Finance Committee debate is here. The next one is here.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Xantar
September 29, 2009 2:16 PM
Wait a second. Aren't members of Congress already on a government run program similar to the public option?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
September 29, 2009 2:20 PM in reply to Xantar
no.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cool Blue Reason
September 29, 2009 2:33 PM in reply to Xantar
No, they have employer-provided healthcare. The only difference is that their employer is us, which makes it "publicly funded," like their salaries.
Some have also noted the extent to which a wide range of insurers are available as options under the plan for members of Congress. To some extent this is thought of as a model for the new health insurance exchange -- provide as many choices as possible.
But there is currently no "government run" plan similar to Medicare on offer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lok52
September 29, 2009 2:38 PM in reply to Xantar
Well, they have a very good health plan, better than most of the country, Unless they choose not to use it. Sen. Sherrod Brown opted out of it in 1992, until everyone has access to insurance. He was self-insured when he was in a car accident with his daughter, so he has first hand experience with the present so called system.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
September 29, 2009 2:57 PM in reply to Xantar
As I understand, members of congress are on FEHBP, an insurance exchange similar to the one both versions of the bill set up. One assumes that, were the public option created, it would be one option in the insurance exchange Congress uses. I am not sure whether FEHBP and the insurance exchange set up by the health care reform bills get merged.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jerryfatheart
September 29, 2009 2:21 PM
Brian, thanks for keeping up for this today. I'm refreshing like a fiend. Call me a cynic, but I don't think Conrad would vote for a public option even if his family came out in support of it. He's just got this weasely weenie vibe about him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 2:22 PM
Go Sen. Kerry...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve T.
September 29, 2009 2:26 PM
Enzi brought up the town hall meetings as well. He said that the polls don't mean anything - and that the reason that some Democrats don't support the Public Option is because the Town Halls proved that the polls don't mean anything... as if insurance industry money doesn't factor in to any of these Senators personal deliberations. What an upstanding bunch they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve T.
September 29, 2009 2:27 PM in reply to Steve T.
Excuse me, I meant Ensign, not Enzi.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mimi katz
September 29, 2009 2:27 PM
It is refreshing to see the greater minds on the Fiunance Commirttee on display for a change. The Baucus Caucus seems to have been largely the dimwit caucus, except they left Bunning out, probably because he can't stay awake.
Imagine what kind of bill would have been crafted if the Dems had gotten together and written one!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Wordie
September 29, 2009 3:01 PM in reply to Mimi katz
If you, or anyone else, would like to send a last minute appeal to the members of the Senate Finance Committee, here's the link to the members list: http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/committee.htm You can click on an individual Senator's name to get to their personal page with their contact info.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brewmn61
September 29, 2009 4:16 PM in reply to Mimi katz
How did this committee get so overweighted with Conservatives? All of the names that kept popping up opposing the PO on the Dem side seem to be on this committee.
I'm hoping (but not hopeful) that this little quirk in committee makeups is noted at reconciliation, and the fact that Finance is significantly more conservative than the country as a whole is taken into account.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 2:34 PM
And Cornyn pulls out the "entitlement" and subsidy Canards right after Kerry debunked them.
Damn the facts! We're republicans, why would we look to facts when they undercut our agenda...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dadzo
September 29, 2009 2:42 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
Did Baucus just say he won't enter a fight he's not guaranteed to win?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 2:49 PM in reply to Dadzo
I think he feels that the uncontested portions of the bill(s) (such as pre-existing condition reform) will be sacrificed in the push for the Public option.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 29, 2009 3:02 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
Guess we know who to target!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:20 PM in reply to AJM
It seems to me that Baucus is actually for the PO and would at the very least be a cloture vote on the PO...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 29, 2009 3:33 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
I don't care what he is for in his heart -- I care what he works for and what he votes for. So far he's a loser.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:42 PM in reply to AJM
His actions and votes up to this point are subject to interpretation. The more he appears to be a thorn in Dem's side the more I believe Repubs would be at least willing to hear him out.
Sure, the Jury is still out, I'm with you there. I try to save most of my scorn for the repukes. (For Now)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dadzo
September 29, 2009 4:45 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
The republicans will hear him (Baucus) out because he's sounding just like them and supporting their position on the public option. A lot of good "pre-existing conditions reform" will do those who still won't be able to afford or qualify for insurance. Without a national public option (no regional co-op scam) and a mandate, health care reform will be little more than incremental improvements for those who are already relatively comfortably covered and a temporary wink at cost/profit moderation on the part of insurance cos.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 29, 2009 6:48 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
Frankly, getting their guys to stay onside and run in the right direction is something that the Republicans are much better at than we are.
As a matter of interpretation, do you think that Baucus's behavior has helped or hurt the chances of getting a public option?
You sound like a guy who would advise a woman to wait for her menses before she hollers rape!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 2:39 PM
I like how republicans have endless republican groups to quote to "bolster" their point.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 2:45 PM
At least Baucus sounded sincere when he said he only against the Public plan because, if included, it will kill the meaningful reforms that are otherwise in the Bill.
That would only be true if dems stay disjointed on this issue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Obama1st
September 29, 2009 2:54 PM
Hey Max...nothing like giving up w/out a fight! I'm sure you will be returning those massive contributions a "purist" for the good of the public! PIECE OF SHIT!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Wordie
September 29, 2009 2:56 PM
Thanks for this Brian!
I was so happy to hear Cantwell's testimony. I thought her points about the excessive health insurance profits in the last 10 years were great, and agree that her remarks about "a newer, better Medicare that will correct for rural disparities, and reward providers that provide cost-effective care, and move away from fee for service," pretty much do demolish not only Conrad's arguments, but much of the arguments against health care reform in general. Not that any of the Republican's are likely to listen to that...
These remarks of Cantwell's were particularly appreciated since there was some doubt several months ago whether she was strong enough in her support of the public option. So it was great to see her come out swinging.
Well, the Rockefeller amendment just went down 8 yea to 15 nay. Too bad...let's see how the Schumer amendment will fare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Obama1st
September 29, 2009 3:01 PM
well..there five dems I will be be looking to opposing in the next primary by contributing to a primary opponent.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Why oh why
September 29, 2009 3:01 PM
"NO: Tom Carper (D-DE)"
And this guy probably won't even run for election, so he can't be accused of pandering to lobbyists. Perhaps he has been listening instead to his former boss, Joe Biden.
And some people still think Obama really wants a public option...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
September 29, 2009 3:11 PM in reply to Why oh why
You've confused Carper with Kaufman. Kaufman is Biden's former COS, and will not be running for reelection next year (a race that at present has no official GOP candidate (although Rep. Mike Castle has allegedly been thinking about it) and is likely to be run for by DE attorney general Beau Biden)
Carper is supposedly his own man, but is actually the legal property of the financial services industry, and is thus much more conservative than his state should be represented by.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Why oh why
September 29, 2009 3:24 PM in reply to holyhandgrenaid
Thanks, that's not as bad as I thought. Just another corporate Dem (c).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
counter coulter
September 29, 2009 3:01 PM
Someone please tell me again what the point is of having Blue Dog Dems? For the life of me I still can't figure out why.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:01 PM
I say lets primary the following
1. Lincoln (AR), Walmart Is already gunning for you, do something good for your constituents on your way out...WTF?
2. Nelson (FL), and take the other Nelson
3. Conrad (ND)
4. Carper (DE)
I'll give Baucus a pass (for Now) as he is the Chairman and needs to operate in a way that he can attempt to garner support from the opposition.
BTW.. OFF topic but, Rockefeller (or Schumer) for Majority Leader.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Obama1st
September 29, 2009 3:09 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
Max shut out single people from even appearing before the committee and due to his massive intake of money, how can you give him a pass. He formed the gang of six to dick around all summer and he is a tool to make sure we have no real reform. Wake the fuck up, dude!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:32 PM in reply to Obama1st
Well, I'd advise you to view my caveat "(for Now)".
Sure he is heavily supported by the Health Insurance Industry. I won't dispute or condone that. That said, they are not his source of votes come election time and be sure that political survival is something politicians care more about than even corporate money. Even if it is only to be able, as an elected official, to take in more corporate money.
So, if his political survival is at risk he will need to do the right thing in the end...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:11 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
Sorry Sen Nelson, I see you are for the Schumer amendment, That is a fair position.
I stand by booting the other Nelson...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Wordie
September 29, 2009 3:09 PM
Wow...Bill Nelson (D-FL) says he'll vote YES on the Schumer amendment! Is it possible that it might pass?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cy Guy
September 29, 2009 3:10 PM
Nelson is vowing to vote for the Schumer option, citing the success of a similar plan in FL when he was the Insurance Commissioner there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:19 PM
It seems the Medicare reimbursment tie in is what killed Rockefellers amendment.
Lets see how Schumer's amendment does
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 3:34 PM
Oh god... Somebody woke up Bunning...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Wordie
September 29, 2009 3:43 PM
Someone should remind Sen. Kyl that the right to sue means little if you are dead because you were denied coverage...
"Without that choice to do things differently, we are going to see exhorbitant rates." Go Maria!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
September 29, 2009 4:25 PM
What I find really wrong about this Commitee's membership (and the inevitable vote tallies because of it) is the over-representation of smallest of states in it.
Its no wonder the individuals in this commitee (with obvious exceptions) are not in tune w/ the 65% of the country in support of what they so callousty voted down.
see the map
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USA_states_population_map_2007_color.svg
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?