TPMDC

GOP Rep. Bob Inglis: Joe Wilson Should Apologize To The House


Rep. Bob Inglis (R-SC)

Read More

Bob Inglis, Joe Wilson

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

A Republican House member from South Carolina, Bob Inglis, is now calling on his fellow South Carolina GOP Congressman Joe Wilson to apologize to the House for his "You lie!" outburst.

Inglis has posted this one Twitter: "Just said to GOP Conference meeting what I said privately to Joe Wilson: apologize to House for rule violation."

He then followed it up with this: "Part 1: Joe Wilson apologized to President. Part 2: He should apologize to House for rule violation. That would end the matter."

And this: "Joe Wilson analogy: I speed, lose control of my car and hit your car. Part 1: I fix your car. Part 2: I pay my speeding ticket. Case closed."

Inglis might just be on thin ice with the right at this point. While his voting record is certainly conservative, on the other hand he's had little tolerance for some of the nuttier things that have been going on.

For example, he told the Washington Post in July about how a man told him a town hall, "keep your government hands off my Medicare." "I had to politely explain that, 'Actually, sir, your health care is being provided by the government,'" Inglis told the Post. "But he wasn't having any of it."

Join the Conversation!

29 comments

Recommend Recommend (4)

September 15, 2009 10:46 AM   

Thank you, Rep. Inglis.

It really is as simple as that: Rep. Wilson? You broke a House rule. Apologize.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 10:48 AM   

this man is not a republican. he might be a conservative, but he's not a republican.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:11 AM    in reply to nova voter

My first thought exactly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:05 PM    in reply to nova voter

Too much character?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:42 PM    in reply to Schmed

Way too much character... on the other hand, maye he is just looking down the road to the State of the Union... no rebuke for Wilson now and being treated like a hero... what's next, will the GOP House members throw tomatoes at the President during the SOTU?

The sad part.... Inglis will probably get primaried over this... but here's hoping he doesn't cave and apologize to Limbaugh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 2:37 PM    in reply to jenzinoh

Inglis won't cave and apologize --he has been saying and doing things like this for some time now, and refuses to back down. (More examples in my comment later in the thread.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 1:07 PM    in reply to nova voter

A Republican is in trouble when the wackos on FreeRepublic think you are a wacko.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:01 AM   

Good on Bob Inglis. It has to be difficult to be a voice of reason in his party right now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:16 AM   

Good for Bob Inglis to be a voice of reason here. Although I imagine that he may not get a plum committee assignment in the House after this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:21 AM   

A man of principle and conviction!

WELL BLOW ME DOWN!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:24 AM   

What's the over/under on how long it takes Inglis to cave to the leader of the Neo-Con Party and apologize for the sin of speaking the truth?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:29 AM    in reply to MSNY

Or the O/U for a primary challenger to announce against Inglis?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 2:14 PM    in reply to TBender

he already is facing several right wing challengers, including State Senator David Thomas. The consensus in SC is that he is in serious danger of losing a primary.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 2:30 PM    in reply to terje

Agreed. He's in upstate and with the way that area has been trending (Clemson grad here, family near Anderson) Inglis is probably toast in the primary. The fact someone with his voting record is not conservative enough to satisfy is significant.

He has decided to go down fighting with class. Cool.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:08 PM    in reply to MSNY

how long it takes Inglis to cave to the leader of the Neo-Con Party

Would that be Limbaugh or Boehner?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:36 AM   

Hmmm. Guess there's still some moral and ethical compasses in South Carolina that haven't been broken beyond repair! Dare I say, gives me hope!?!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 11:51 AM   

I love how Joe Wilson's website says he will not be "muzzled"

Perfect word choice there: "muzzled", like a rabid dog that bites unless you tie its mouth shut.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:09 PM    in reply to AnswerFrog

Hmmmm. Does one really muzzle a rabid dog?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:44 PM    in reply to Schmed

Perhaps nto the treatment of choice, but you'd rather have one unmuzzled?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 1:02 PM    in reply to Schmed

Treatment for rabid dog: Death panel.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:13 PM   

It would be interesting to know what others in that meeting had to say wouldn't it? At least there is one Republican with the cajones to stand up and insist that the rules be followed and shown some respect. That is unusual in a party dominated by authoritarian crackpot leaders and followers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:13 PM   

They do exist!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:20 PM   

I think we ought to ask Timmeh, Mittens, Sarah P, Ghouliani, and any other Rep thinking of running for President (Bachmann - SHUDDER) whether Wilson's outburst was appropriate and whether he should apologize to the chamber.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:23 PM   

i like the speeding car analogy, but, think christie's example more illustrative of how joe thinks it works.

#1 drive car down one way street and hit someone.
#2 pull rank on cop and get police escort to work.
#3 pay undisclosed secret settlement
#4 deny it ever happened

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 12:52 PM   

An honest Conservative, perhaps he should switch parties before he becomes infected with what ever it is that seems to make Repigs Stupid and incorrigible.....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

September 15, 2009 1:06 PM   

Kayne West publicly apologized. Why can't Joe Wilson? :P

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 1:38 PM    in reply to mcc

Coffee-through-nose moment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 2:12 PM   

Is Bob Inglis determined to lose his primary?

Inglis has already attracted several extremely serious primary opponents next year, all running at him from the far right -- and since there is a 50% run-off requirement, having a split opposition won't save him.

Inglis has said and done a remarkable number of sane things over the last few years. He voted against Bush on the 2007 Iraq surge, and thinks that climate change is real and man-made and advocates a carbon tax to address it. He has crossed party lines to vote with Democrats on fuel-efficiency standards, banning torture, and expanding funding for HIV/AIDS. Despite opposing the stimulus legislation, when Governor Sanford was making noise about rejecting the federal funds, Inglis told him "for goodness sake, just take the money."

When Mark Sanford got caught hiking the Appalachian Trail, Inglis opined that it was a reminder that Republicans need to “lose the stinking rot of self-righteousness” and “to understand we are all in need of some grace.”

He called Glenn Beck a "fear-monger" and had the nerve to tell a town hall full of tea-baggers that they should "is turn that television off when he comes on."

His recent history has been full of such apostasy -- having the nerve to speak some common sense in a way that infuriates the right wing extremists in his party.

Unfortunately, Inglis' district is extremely right wing - Obama only won 37% - the more he says things like this, the greater chance that he will be ousted in his primary.

(Inglis shows all signs of becoming an updated version of another southern Republican Congressman -- John Buchanan, a Baptist minister who represented Alabama in the US House as a Republican from 1964 until 1980, when he was defeated in the primary. Like Inglis, Buchanan began to stray ever so slightly from the Republican culture wars, and was taken out in the primary. He went on to serve as chair of the Board of People for the American Way and to denounce the extremist takeover of his party.)

Inglis is way too conservative to be a Democrat (and a Democrat couldn't be elected in his district). He is too sane to be a Republican. Perhaps he would be more comfortable as an independent, but that seems unlikely. He has clearly decided that if he is going to be taken out in a primary, he is going to go down in flames and put up one hell of a fight for sanity in the process.


As an added bonus, here is Inglis's explanation of his fear-mongerer comment from an interview -- one that wouldn't be out of place on the comments section here:

That’s what Glenn Beck is all about. And Lou Dobbs. I’ve had the misfortune of listening to those shows a couple of times... I don’t listen often to Glenn Beck, but when I have, I’ve come away just so disappointed with the negativity… the ‘We’ve just gone to pot as a country,’ and ‘All is lost’ and ‘There is no hope.’ It’s not consistent with the America that I know. The America I know was founded by people who took tiny boats across a big ocean, and pushed west in tiny wagons, and landed on the moon. That’s the America I heard on the streets of Boiling Springs... The America that Glenn Beck seems to see is a place where we all should be fearful, thinking that our best days are behind us. It sure does sell soap, but it sure does a disservice to America... If Walter Cronkite said something like Glenn Beck said recently on the air, about the president being a racist, Cronkite would’ve been fired on the spot. But I guess the executives of these cable news shows are more enamored with the profits that come from selling this negative message than they are with undermining the faith of people in this wonderful constitutional republic.”

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 15, 2009 2:28 PM   

Bless you, Rep. Inglis. The Republican Guide for Decorum and Civility Rules in the House of Representatives is very explicit about what is not tolerated (calling the President a liar or otherwise questioning his honesty). It's about time someone pulled out the rule book and said what is supposed to be the penalty for such deplorable behavior.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on