A key House liberal, Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, says that a vast majority of House liberals aren't about to agree to another compromise on the public option.
"The vast majority of CPC is not prepared to wave a white flag on public option," Grijalva told Greg Sargent. "A trigger would be a surrender."
As Greg notes, a vast majority of the 60-or-so members who vowed to oppose a bill without a public option would still be enough to ensure that the bill did not pass.
By way of contrast, House Majority leader Steny Hoyer says the public option might have to go. And a knowledgeable House aide tells me that many progressives are looking at other ways to achieve "real reform."
As before, House leaders can only lose 38 votes within the Democratic caucus if a bill is going to pass.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Indie Pro
September 8, 2009 1:21 PM
Good on them.
They can expect vigorous support!
many progressives are looking at other ways to achieve "real reform."
even open to this, as long as it produces savings/subsidies to go along with those individual mandates
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
September 8, 2009 1:26 PM
So some are "wavering", some say no go unless there's a public option, some say we might have to forge ahead without a public option, some way that a trigger is "surrender", blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Way to go, Dems. Way to seize the opportunity provided by the return from recess to present a cohesive narrative ahead of the president's speech.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
September 8, 2009 1:32 PM in reply to CT Voter
There is more than one Democrat, and some of the Democrats do not agree with one another.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
September 8, 2009 1:36 PM in reply to mcc
Oh, I hear you. However, I'm just more than a little fed up with Democrats being unable to stick to a message for more than 40 milliseconds. The media is already primed and ready to bleat "Dems in disarray!!!!!" Why must they continually help that along? What good comes from all this?
Yes, I know. It's better than being the braindead lockstep Republicans, or so I'm sure I'll be lectured on. But isn't there an in between place?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
September 8, 2009 1:38 PM
The good news is that we really only need about 15 of them to hold firm: http://openleft.com/diary/14982/just-a-touch-of-math
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?