In taking up Ted Kennedy's mantle as chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) is leaving no doubt that he plans to fight hard for a politically contentious feature of his panel's health care reform bill.
"That bill -- mark my word, I'm the chairman -- is going to have a strong public option," Harkin told constituents at his annual Steak Fry in Iowa.
He made it clear, too, that he views a strong fight for the public option as part of his role in carrying on Kennedy's legacy. "We lost a great progressive, a great leader on so many issues," Harkin said. "It now falls to me to pick up the torch."
Harkin's ability to impact the fight over public option will be determined in no small part by whether he's selected as a negotiator if and when House and Senate health care legislation are merged in a conference committee. Though he now chairs the HELP committee, the panel's health care process was overseen by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) who acted as chairman until shortly after Kennedy's death.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Indie Pro
September 14, 2009 11:41 AM
Hooray for Harkin!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
September 14, 2009 12:27 PM in reply to Indie Pro
is Massachusetts the new model for healthcare reform?
isn't it the most expensive in the world?
Time to start talking about huge liberal exemptions from the mandates or no mandates and a severly scaled back bill. T
he insurance industry will get tax dollars to perpetuate a bad system and still many will be left out.
No wonder Big Pharma is behind this bill.
This is the conservative's bill. Dem conservatives, like Obama.
...the Colorado Center on Law and Policy examined the household budgets of 903 low- and moderate-income families and concluded that those who spend more than 5 percent of earnings on health care end up making sacrifices in child care, transportation, housing or other areas. Some of these families, faced with significant debt and insufficient income to meet their expenses, could not afford much more than token premium costs, the survey determined.
Lower earners "have very little capacity to absorb significant health care costs," says Peter Cunningham, a senior fellow at the Center for Studying Health System Change, a Washington, D.C. research nonprofit. "We've found financial burdens and medical debt have increased the most for low-income or middle-income people who have private insurance."
The overhaul plan would offer little benefit for some of those families who say they are struggling right now to afford insurance
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2009/September/04/health-insurance-affordability-rau.aspx
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
September 14, 2009 1:15 PM in reply to Indie Pro
You're an idiot.
Let me guess: your a far-right lunatic fringer troll.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
September 14, 2009 2:37 PM in reply to JNagarya
and yet you offer no counter argument. Just insults.
That's kaiser's report I quoted and linked.
Here's a report about how the insurance industry if all gushy over Obama and the reform:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/11/health/policy/11insure.html?_r=2&ref=us
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
September 15, 2009 12:54 PM in reply to Indie Pro
The counter "argument" has already been made: read President Obama's speech to the joint session of Congress.
Otherwise, I don't tend to believe self-flattering and -promoting press releases of private industry are objective -- or even truthful. You're of course free to fall for them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
September 14, 2009 3:29 PM in reply to JNagarya
The drug industry’s trade group plans to roll out a series of television advertisements in coming weeks specifically to support Senator Max Baucus’s health care overhaul proposal, according to an industry official involved in the planning.
The move would be a follow-up to the deal that drug makers struck in June with Mr. Baucus and the Obama.
http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/12/drug-makers-plan-to-back-baucus-plan-with-ad-dollars/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
September 15, 2009 10:03 AM in reply to JNagarya
Be careful when you call someone a troll here. I did yesterday and got reamed for it - not that I care mind you - as I call it the way I see it. Sounds like a troll to me too
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ploeg
September 14, 2009 11:56 AM
That's one Senator from Iowa who we can believe in.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 14, 2009 12:09 PM
I've got an irrelevant and trivial question, but it's one that's been bugging me for years, so I'm hoping someone in the know can help me out.
Do they really serve steak at his "Steak Fry," and, if so, what kind of steak, to how many people and do they really fry them? Cook it on a slab grill? Cook it on a real gas grill?
Please. I'm serious. I'd really like to know.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 14, 2009 12:20 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
You are right. Irrelevant and trivial. Go to google.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 14, 2009 3:09 PM in reply to soupson52
A thousand curses! Nabbed by the Ministry for the Prevention of Vice and Frivilous Questions Seriousness Police.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 14, 2009 3:49 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
heh heh. Thanks for lightening me up! Sorry I don't know the answer but I truly believe google will!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minne sconsin
September 14, 2009 1:21 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Republicans - Real Americans - wouldn't have a "steak fry". They would take their cow on the hoof, dismember it with their bare hands and eat it raw off the bone. Or if they did cook it, they'd batter the whole damned cow & deep-fat fry it, pulling it out of the boiling oil with their bare hands.
Only a wussy Democrat would worry about whether (or how) their meat was cooked.
/snark
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 14, 2009 3:11 PM in reply to Minne sconsin
Whole cow battered and deep fried? Sounds like Chili's or TGI Friday's.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 14, 2009 5:15 PM in reply to Minne sconsin
Nah. They'd "hunt" the cow in a hunting preserve, corner it against a fence and riddle it with so many bullets from their semi-automatic weapons that it would become inedible. Then they'd walk away clapping each other on the back over what real men they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aliceolson
September 14, 2009 10:20 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Yes, they serve steak to everyone. It's grilled, not fried.
Tickets for the event are $25.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 14, 2009 12:23 PM
Thank you Senator Harkin! It is so reassuring to know someone is still fighting for the American people, even those ignorant ones who, like drowning victims, try to take their saviors down with them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
xargaw
September 14, 2009 12:42 PM
I have always thought Harkin was the real deal. It is good to have a committed voice take up Ted Kennedys charge as he assumes the chairmanship. There is only reason for not supporting a public option and that is campaign cash. Obama has made is clear it will be revenue neutral. So anyone that opposes it is doing so for their own selfish benefit. This one point should be shouted daily at our lazy media pundits.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
September 14, 2009 3:00 PM
I believe Harkin than I do the others. Public option remains.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
September 14, 2009 6:11 PM
I love the smell of change. NO public option=NO REAL REFORM~!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kovie
September 15, 2009 12:21 AM
I take Harkin's remarks to mean that the HELP committee's bill will have a public option, not that the senate's let alone the final post-conference bill will have one. That's going to be up to Obama, progressives, and the leadership of both houses. It really depends on who stands firmest, and whom Obama is most willing to roll. My read is that he's got no problem rolling progressives, yet again. He almost seems to enjoy it, however faux progressive he comes across in his Lucy-like speeches.
And yet fools still defend him as having a secret plan or having no choice...
Uhuh.
I'm guessing that most of them are shills, though.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
September 15, 2009 10:00 AM
Translation there wont be a public option the corporations win
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mld678
September 15, 2009 11:18 AM
This is an emotional issue for many Americans. To conquer these serious changes, doesn’t it seem right to advocate for greater transparency in both quality and price information, for it overlaps with many other issues? http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/issues/index.cfm?ID=300
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
September 16, 2009 11:49 AM
Marcus in WP:
"Under the Finance Committee proposal, individuals would be required to obtain insurance. But to drive down the cost of the package, Montana Democrat Max Baucus's Gang of Six -- a gang that pointedly does not include Wyden -- trimmed the size of the subsidies available for those who could not afford insurance on their own.
Now, a family earning three times the poverty level -- $66,150 for a family of four -- would have to pay up to 13 percent of their income for health insurance. And that's just the premiums -- not counting deductibles, co-payments and out-of-pocket expenses. "
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?