On the left, the Senate Finance Committee health care reform bill has been ripped apart by (deep breath): Health Care for America Now, AFL-CIO, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Sen. Roland Burris, Rep. Raul Grijalva, Rep. Anthony Weiner, and, I'm sure, others.
It earned an icy reception from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and a lukewarm (though overall positive) response from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the aisle, it's still getting no love on the right. Even from moderate Republicans. Blue Dogs like it, though!
Late update: Despite calling the Baucus plan the "best effort to date," even the Chamber of Commerce has "grave concerns" and says "the bill still needs tremendous improvement." You can read the full statement below the fold.
"Chairman Baucus has made a good faith effort to address the concerns of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and we thank him for his inclusive efforts. The business community has strongly advocated for health care reform and the Senate Finance bill is the best effort to date.
"We applaud the provisions in this bill that will lower health care costs, increase coverage, and improve the quality of care. These range from fairly regulating the insurance market to enacting tax parity for small businesses and the self employed. We strongly support allowing plans to be sold nationally, and allowing individuals to purchase health insurance across state lines. This bill does not contain a government-run "public option", and the Congressional Budget Office has certified it as the first comprehensive health reform bill that will actually bend the cost curve and get health care costs under control.
"However, we have grave concerns over the vast array of new taxes contained in the bill. This bill creates a new tax on benefits that may well spiral out of control to become the next Alternative Minimum Tax. It taxes prescriptions, insurance policies, medical devices, clinics and labs... and all of these taxes will increase costs for employers and workers. The bill does not contain health courts or any other meaningful medical liability reform. Not to mention, the bill creates a massive new entitlement in the form of insurance credits that will burden taxpayers now and in the future. Overall, the bill still needs tremendous improvement.
We look forward to continuing to work with the Chairman and other policy makers as this difficult but important process continues to move forward."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Greg
September 16, 2009 7:08 PM
That's not really fair. The Blue Dogs liked it.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/59031-blue-dogs-praise-baucus-bill
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brian Beutler
September 16, 2009 7:16 PM in reply to Greg
Good call.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DA in LA
September 16, 2009 7:19 PM
Shocked, I tell you! Shocked!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
September 16, 2009 7:22 PM
Max got owned
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eric the red
September 16, 2009 8:23 PM in reply to 3star2nr
Completely worthless. I wonder if Baucus just wanted to generate some campaign money so he put this together. Right now, it would get like 3 votes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
September 17, 2009 1:34 PM in reply to 3star2nr
Max IS owned, lock, stock, and barrel.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
joevan
September 16, 2009 8:12 PM
Come on, the insurance companies must like it.They bribed him w/ $1.5 million in just the last couple years:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/20/AR2009072003363.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
henk
September 16, 2009 10:43 PM in reply to joevan
Don't forget the drug companies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
traitorjoe
September 16, 2009 8:15 PM
A completely shitty bill that costs MORE than health care now and gives many paybacks to the insurance companies. Let's hope the recoil from this vile proposal makes the public option viable. Buh-bye Baucus.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
September 16, 2009 8:27 PM in reply to traitorjoe
time top vote this clown out. What the hell is that thing
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mumphrey
September 16, 2009 9:05 PM in reply to 3star2nr
Yes. Too bad, though, that he's less than a year into his new term. 2014 is a way away, yet...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DonDavis
September 16, 2009 8:26 PM
Webster’s Dictionary Adds ‘Baucus’: A Caucus of One
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=8854
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tim
September 17, 2009 7:18 AM in reply to DonDavis
Under the term "Payola" there's a big fat picture of Baucus with a sh!t eating grin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
September 16, 2009 8:47 PM
Who needs friends on the left or right when you have THREE MILLION FRIENDS from the Health Insurance Company LOBBYISTS??
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
plan69
September 16, 2009 8:55 PM
Of course the Blues Dogs like it. That's where the Insurance Companies have been focusing their lobbying efforts. They knew they had the Rescumlicans on board to vote against any healthcare reform.......what they really needed was to turn some Dems to their cause and voila!! The Blue Dog Caucus!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
guyermo
September 16, 2009 9:50 PM
When you've lost Burris...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cmpnwtr
September 16, 2009 10:15 PM
Poor Maxie, nobody like him, or his bill.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
September 16, 2009 10:16 PM
"How long until we white people will stop insisting that blacks exercise personal responsibility, build strong families, educate themselves enough to edit the Harvard Law Review, and work hard enough to become President of the United States, only to threaten to assassinate them when they do?"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/9/16/783113/-HOW-LONG
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
September 17, 2009 7:02 AM in reply to FebM
This is an spam email. I suggest you identify someone calling for Obama's assassination or apologize for being a racist and all around jerk.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 17, 2009 2:48 PM in reply to FebM
FebM, so glad I went to the link. What an incredible piece of writing out
of Georgia! I remember being in a "Christian" college choir class when word arrived that President Kennedy had been assassinated. Those pathetic members, who had just been singing some "Praise God" song, CHEERED. BTW, it was not a southern college, It was Judson, located in Elgin, Il.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sherifffruitfly
September 16, 2009 10:34 PM
Pure, complete, and incontrovertible proof that this bill CANNOT be bipartisan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tomg802
September 16, 2009 10:39 PM
If this thing passed the Dems will lose the vote of everyone that can't afford to pay for insurance but are forced. That is just a few million or so. Most don't vote now but they will. There goes the majority. I'm just sick it could put the crazies back in power in no time. Good job Bluedogs!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 17, 2009 2:52 PM in reply to Tomg802
I think that is why the President has been out every morning this week so far, speaking to people about his plan. We will get a public option, I believe. I think he is going to take our responses back to D.C.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
September 16, 2009 10:51 PM
"Meanwhile, on the other side of the aisle, it's still getting no love on the right. Even from moderate Republicans. Blue Dogs like it, though!"
Blue dogs have been the target of this shoddy exercise all along. Fact of the matter is there are enough corpordems, conservadems and blue dogs in the Senate so that an actual good bill really has little chance getting even the 50 votes needed for reconcilation, never mind 60 votes to avoid GOP filibustering.
As usual for progressives, the options seem dim and dimmer. We can get a shitty, insurance industry-friendly bill from the likes of Baucus, which, basically will only please those now being totally screwed by insurance companies -- those with preexisting conditions or those who have exhausted caps on coverage or been non-renewed because they were sick. That's not nothing, but because there will be no cost-controls on the insurers -- like a strong public option would provide -- they are just going to raise the rates on the rest of the big majority of people who already have insurance and they will be none too happy about it. The public is then quite likely to react by saying: See! Those Democrats are no better than Republicans in siding with the special interests (I'm hearing this already from people saying the Dems are doing nothing to rein in the banks -- and they are right). From there it's not too hard for the average non-ideological voter to vote GOP again. I find most people can't compute my argument that it's the conservative corporate Dems who stymie things, not the progressive majority of the party. They just blame Democrats in general.
The other option is the liberal majority of the party stands up to the conservadems and the bill goes down when the conservadems won't fold. The public once again blames Democrats in general and we have 1994 all over again.
My guess is the first option is the final result. I would lover to believe the second option would hold with the exception that the conservadems fold, and logically they should, since they are the most likely ones to lose in any GOP comeback. But I'm certainly not holding my breathe.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
September 16, 2009 11:09 PM
This is good that this P.O.S. os going nowhere.
Put Rockefeller in charge of reconciling the Senate's bill and the House ones and send Max on vacation.
The HELP bill was fine. The House ones are good. Baucus has wasted enough of our time with his incompetence and corruption.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JustAChicagoVoter
September 17, 2009 2:26 AM
You look really surprised about the reception, Sen. Baucus, ya stupid jackass!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
September 17, 2009 6:44 AM
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
September 17, 2009 7:10 AM
This all goes to show liberals just aren't all that smart. Coming up with "pie in the sky" ideas is easy, making them work isn't.
Welcome to the real world.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CranialRectalLoopback
September 17, 2009 7:22 AM
I predict today that the Baucus Bill, with no support from his own gang-bang of six, will be the bill signed by Chess Grand Master President Obama.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oskieoskie
September 17, 2009 8:48 AM in reply to CranialRectalLoopback
Barack can't sign a bill that Congress doesn't pass. The president has clearly stated the bill he wants to see, and we are waiting for the House and Senate to get it done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VLaszlo
September 17, 2009 8:17 AM
Democrats (almost) satisfy their basic constituency, the Chamber of Commerce.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
September 17, 2009 8:38 AM
Poor little Max. He's ugly and smells bad, and nobody likes him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sashimi
September 17, 2009 9:44 AM
The Baucus bill will be remembered as a classic case of WASTING TAX PAYERS MONEY in the history, the end.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
afisher
September 17, 2009 10:03 AM
The only thing that the Baucus Bill did was increase the campaign coffers of the Blue Dogs and let the Right Wing crazy's increase their prominence within the GOP. His bill is even more out of touch with the American Public that the yet to be submitted GOP Bill authored by Price of Georgia.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?