The Massachusetts Republican Party has issued a statement in the wake of a judge's ruling against their effort to stop the appointment of Sen.-designate Paul Kirk -- and there is no mention of an appeal. So it looks like this thing is probably over, and Kirk will be sworn in this afternoon.
Key quote from the statement:
I urge the voters of Massachusetts to not allow the courts the final say in this matter. I believe the ultimate remedy to the untenable situation on Beacon Hill can be found in the voting booths.
It is up to the voters of Massachusetts to finally decide enough is enough and to refuse to re-elect the entrenched incumbents responsible for raising our taxes in the middle of a recession, turning a blind eye to public corruption, and manipulating the law to keep their grip on power.
Shortly before the statement went out, a spokesperson for the state GOP told us that there would be no further comment on their plans, beyond the statement itself. So it looks like they're very angrily waving the white flag.
Full statement after the jump.
BOSTON - Following a decision issued today by Suffolk County Superior Court Judge Thomas Connolly to consider a request for injunctive relief filed by the Massachusetts Republican Party, Jennifer Nassour, Chairman of the MassGOP, issued the following statement:
"From President Obama to Senate Majority Leader Reid to Governor Patrick, Democrats have mounted a campaign to change Massachusetts election law for their own political expediency. Today the Massachusetts Republican Party has exposed them for what they are; purely partisan. While the court saw that our argument warranted a hearing, it ultimately disagreed.
I urge the voters of Massachusetts to not allow the courts the final say in this matter. I believe the ultimate remedy to the untenable situation on Beacon Hill can be found in the voting booths.
It is up to the voters of Massachusetts to finally decide enough is enough and to refuse to re-elect the entrenched incumbents responsible for raising our taxes in the middle of a recession, turning a blind eye to public corruption, and manipulating the law to keep their grip on power.
The preliminary elections for mayor in cities across the Commonwealth show an anti-incumbent sentiment, indicating that voters are fed up with the status quo. It is my sincere hope that this frustration turns into action in the January U.S. Senate special election and into November 2010, and that voters reject the pawns of the special interests and the Democrat Party and elect candidates who believe this is a government for the people."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

junkmailqueen
September 25, 2009 1:26 PM
It's certainly true that the Democrats have a death grip on government in MA. And also that corruption is rife. Of course, voters already know that GOP corruption would be just as bad, and they'd rather have corrupt Dems than corrupt Repups. Lord, I miss living there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
September 25, 2009 2:06 PM in reply to junkmailqueen
Where do you live? Maybe we can switch.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JustAChicagoVoter
September 25, 2009 2:33 PM
I'm sort of surprised they lost. It seemed like the law was on their side in this one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
September 25, 2009 2:44 PM in reply to JustAChicagoVoter
How so?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lestatdelc
September 25, 2009 4:00 PM in reply to JustAChicagoVoter
Nope. The law was not on their side.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
September 25, 2009 5:04 PM in reply to JustAChicagoVoter
A troll???
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
September 25, 2009 2:43 PM
[Republican Party asks the court to do something]
[Courts say no]
Republican Party: WHO ARE THE COURTS TO DECIDE?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gharlane
September 25, 2009 9:17 PM in reply to mcc
Actually, I have to give the MA GOP credit for not saying that.
This is, indeed, surrender/acceptance language. Not only did they not mention an appeal, they didn't even say the court was wrong. Never mind the usual GOP frothing about unelected activist judges usurping rights blah blah blah. So they've surrendered, and (for the GOP anyway) done so with reasonable grace. We'll get ours at the voting booth, they say. Fine. Let 'em try.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
September 25, 2009 3:04 PM
I'm not surprised they lost. I knew they would. This is MA after all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Old Grouch
September 25, 2009 3:24 PM
Shorter: Waaaaaaahhhhhhhh!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lestatdelc
September 25, 2009 3:59 PM in reply to The Old Grouch
LOL, GMTA
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 25, 2009 3:54 PM
Somehow, some way, this must be ACORN's fault.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lestatdelc
September 25, 2009 3:58 PM
Shorter (bus) GOP:
"Waaaaaaaaaa!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
September 25, 2009 8:09 PM
Whatever the political hardball involved, this court challenge was specious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oblio
September 26, 2009 12:31 AM
of course they're not going to appeal. I noted that a Senate appointment from Deval Patrick was easily going to happen just a few days ago. When your site totally out-Politico'd the Politico in stressing that confirming Kennedy's replacement was going to be a serious and contentious issue in Massachusetts, of all places, that's when site really blew it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?