TPMDC

More And More Schools Not Showing Obama's Stay-In-School Speech

Read More

Education

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's become clear that as President Obama delivers his speech on staying in school, a whole lot of schools won't be showing it.

As we noted before, some local groups are organizing in favor of the speech, and opposing school officials who have decided not to show it. Most schools are doing the sensible thing and allowing parents who object to their kids seeing a speech by that evil socialist dictator to opt out. But some aren't showing it at all.

Here's just a small sampling of some more schools and school districts that won't be showing the speech, available after the jump.

In Fort Collins, Colorado, Fort Collins High School principal Mark Eversole sent out an e-mail announcing that the video will not be shown in school, after the local district left the decision up to each school. "I have received a number of calls opposed to the viewing based on several issues," Eversole wrote in the e-mail. "I do not make this decision based on any political views, but rather there are alternative options."

In Berthoud, Colorado, Berthoud Elementary and Turner Middle School will not be showing the speech. Turner principal Bill Siebers said in a note sent home to parents: "Teachers would like to view the speech and possibly show it at another time with educational purpose and support of curriculum. If the speech is shown in class after September 8th, teachers will send a letter home to parents."

In Prescott, Arizona, Superintendent Kevin J. Kapp sent out this notice: "As the superintendent of schools, I am not comfortable with school district resources being used for this purpose; therefore Prescott Unified School District will not carry the speech either via television or via computers in our schools."

Also in Arizona, at least three more school districts won't be showing the video: Bullhead City, Mohave Valley, and the Colorado River Union High School District. "If a government class or current events class decides to show the video at a later date, opt out forms will be sent home to the parents with the time and date of the video being shown in class," said one administrator

In Nixa, Missouri, a Republican stronghold, the local school district opted to not show the video after local conservative bloggers and a talk-radio host made it a cause célèbre.

Schools won't be showing the speech in the Tredyffrin/Easttown School District, Pennsylvania. Said an administrator: "We will not broadcast the speech live in our schools, based on the timing of the speech, and we want to let teachers review the speech first to see if it fits into their curriculum."

Also in Pennsylvania, the North Penn School District won't be showing the video, saying that there was not enough time to give parents proper notice.

In the Alamance-Burlington school district, North Carolina, some schools are opting to show the video -- but only if students have a signed permission slip from their parents. Students without a signed slip will be given an "appropriate education alternative" during the speech. So these schools are going beyond giving conservative parents the ability to opt out -- everyone else has to opt in.

Join the Conversation!

89 comments

Recommend Recommend (5)

September 7, 2009 6:06 PM   

Oh Please. This is soo f'n pathetic. The president wants to give a motivational speech to students and schools are saying screw you. What is happening to this country? I really don't get it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:08 PM    in reply to Michael A

It's called RACISM!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:00 AM    in reply to Bose

Add: Longmeadow, Mass.

Is there something about rich towns?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 12:47 PM    in reply to BluGrass

Yes: the tend to vote Republican in order to protect their pocketbooks. To protect, that is, the status quo, while hoping for more tax cuts they still don't need.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

wyt

user-pic

September 8, 2009 9:07 AM    in reply to Bose

Well, you've got to expect all the high-finance millionaires in Greenwich to want to shield their gentle kids from the president. After all he's been so rough on them!

Besides, it's the ancestral Bush home. Why, it tortures them to think there's not a Bush in the White House.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:36 PM   

Lawlz, Prescott? I went to HS at PHS when i used to live in AZ. That PoS school isnt going to show the speech?

"As the superintendent of schools, I am not comfortable with school district resources being used for this purpose; therefore Prescott Unified School District will not carry the speech either via television or via computers in our schools."

"For this purpose" he says. I guess he doesn't want kids to study hard and stay in school.

Its amazing that these people in power over schools can so easily abuse their power because of their own political views.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:38 PM   

Dear God, a North Carolina school district is the stupidest of the bunch.

A permission slip? They have to have bring a permission slip to watch the President of the United States give a speech about the importance of hard work just like they would if they were going to watch a movie featuring bare breasts or "F" bombs?

Can anyone, in their wildest dream, imagine such a thing happening if this had been George W. Bush doing this?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:48 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Nope. The thing that really is pathetic is that it totally demeans the Office of the Presidency. What is with these lunatics? Dems wouldn't be doing this if the king had wanted to give a speech like this. It really is soooo sad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:51 PM    in reply to Michael A

Well the people in power who are doing this are sure showing their true colors though. They should be confronted on exactly why they object so much to the president encourgageing kids to do better and say in school.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 7:45 PM    in reply to musgrove

The news showed a woman saying, "I'm against gay marriage, and I'm against abortion, and he supports it, and I don't want that stuff shoved down the kids' throats."

Does that loon actually believe that? Or is that just an excuse -- and exploited, additionally, as an excuse to yet again righteously give voice to her bigotries?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 12:26 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

If it makes you feel any better, I'm one county over and my NC school district is definitely showing the speech. We got a "Connect Ed" (district-wide voice and email messaging system) notice tonight from ou elementary school principal assuring parents that their children "would all get to watch the President's address to America's school children tomorrow." The phrasing of the message made me think that the administrators here were getting calls worried that it might not be shown, rather than hearing lots of objections. I found this kind of funny, especially since The phone rang just after we had been reassuring our 4th grader that he could watch the speech when he got home, if they didn't show it at school.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:11 PM    in reply to thisniss

What the school system should make clear is this:

This is an opportunity to see the president speak on matters of education -- a rare "teaching moment" not to be missed. So the schools will be showing the speech.

Those parents who don't want their children to see the speech are welcome to make other arrangements for them; but be warned that the child will be marked as "absent" for that day on her/his record.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:42 PM   

Obama school speech: worst fears realized. Brainwashing, Bolshevism and blasphemy. Protect your children!


See:


http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/obama-brainwashing-obama-brainwashing/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 6:52 PM   

Quote: "Here's just a small sampling of some more schools and school districts that won't be showing the speech, available after the jump."

Eric, Are you sure this is just a "small sampling"? I was reading that the MSM is doing the same thing with this speech to the kids that they did with the August town halls -- i.e., covering the sensationalist crap and ignoring the majority of town halls (or schools) that are doing the right thing.

So here's my question: On what do you base your statement that the list presented above is "just a small sampling"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:27 AM    in reply to Lynn Dee

That's a great point. The corporate cable channels (and TPM) are all too happy to throw chum in the water for ratings and the left is all too ready to play their role hyperventilating any time that Repugs scream, "the sky is falling, the sky is falling!" Even worse, Repugs are screaming about the sky falling every other day now and rather than maintain some sort of calm longer-term perspective, and show Repugs up as "the boy who cried wolf" or anti-American racists, liberals instinctively go into panic mode over and over and over again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 12:50 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

I'll have you know I have a piece of the sky as evidence that it IS falling. It fell on my front lawn.

It does look suspiciously pre-fab, though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 7:18 PM   

The Dee post is exactly right. TPM is joining POLITICO in over-hyping unrepresentative things. So far, at least, it looks as if the internet age in news is making the biases of the media toward pure hyped "controversies" worse, and this profoundly biases against progressive governance. A large trend should never be posited or implied unless there is really strong evidence for that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:36 AM    in reply to Theda Skocpol

It isn't just hype. Granted this is anecdotal, however, last Saturday when I was volunteering in the state Democratic booth at the Minnesota state fair, the second most common topic visitors brought up was this speech. Democrats, at least those who came into the booth, are angry about schools refusing to show the speech. I wasn't prompting them. They just brought it up out of nowhere. So despite my admission this is anecdotal and people who come to a Democratic booth are self-selected, I'm convinced the Democratic grassroots is genuinely worked up about this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:09 AM    in reply to Theda Skocpol

Yes, exactly. There are thousands of school districts in the US. Operatives have hijacked the national debate by persuading a few of them to issue press releases.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 12:59 PM    in reply to dcdanny

They've hijacked the "national debate" about waht. The President's spech? Where's the "debate"; all their doing is pissing and whining in effort to pollute the political discourse.

Watch: when the vast majority who don't yet know the content of the speech learn that isn't anything remotely close to the paranoid horseshit, it'll backfire.

And there will be repercussions for school boards that caved to the political pressure of a miniscule minority of far-right lunatic fringe of illiterates: most parents don't appreciate their kids being deprived of education, or having that disrupted, by out-and-out FALSE horseshit.

The True Believers who hang on Glenn Beck's every "we uncover the trtuh" LIE probably won't be persuaded by the actual truth; but perhaps a few aren't yet so indoctrinated that they will see the huge disparity between lie, on one hand, and reality, on the other.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 7:53 PM   

These parents and school districts are beyond stupid. Have they forgotten the Internet? Can anyone say,"Youtube"? Let them ban it and then the kids could watch it at home on the computer or at a friends house while the parents aren't home.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 7:53 PM    in reply to VivaAmerica!

They'll want to watch it after all this fear mongering.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 10:49 PM   

Even this "small sampling" tells me something is terribly wrong with this country. This is a speech to school kids by the president of the United States. If even one school district in the nation had objected I would have wondered about their motives, if not their sanity. Instead, they're cropping up all over the place.

This is nuts. Thanks, TPM, for posting this. Let me know what other communities are objecting. I'll be sure never to cross into their town limits. Crazy people. . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 7, 2009 11:46 PM   

This is crazy. Our large school district is not showing the speech. Individual teachers who decide to show it in their classrooms have to send a letter home letting students opt out. I don't remember this happening for any other public official ever, including our current governor who came into power during a recall of the previous governor by promising he could govern the state of California just fine by cutting taxes. His first official business was to cancel the "car tax". Here we are years later and the schools are surviving this year only because of the stimulus money from Obama's program. That stinkin' socialist is giving the schools money and he is going to taint the kids by telling them to do their homework and study hard. Go figure.

Last time I saw people this freaking crazy was when George Wallace wouldn't let those little black kids go to a white school. I guess their worst fears were realized. A smart little black kid grew up to be president.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:20 AM    in reply to FreeForAll

I enjoyed your comments & am frustrated that the district I work in & send my own children is not showing the speech. Where are my rights as a parent to have my kids see it? What about the educational value for students?

My fear is what not showing this speech really says about the schools. What does this say to our non-white students and families? I am very worried we haven't really come as far as we thought. This is appalling! For 14 years I've been teaching U.S. History & every year until now, students wondered why we never had a president that wasn't a white man. They thought it must be written in the Constitution. Sadly, now that we have one... students are witnessing an unprecedented censorship & disrespect of the presidency. These protests/bans will be lessons in themselves to our children & the future generations -- as the cliche goes, actions speak louder than words. What does this say about us today???

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 5:05 AM    in reply to Teacher

We are the choir and we agree. The question remains what are you doing in your district to say...hey wait...my child deserves to hear the President's address, too.

I almost wish my child was still in public school here in NC so I could keep her home to watch the speech on C-SPAN and then dare the principal to call it an unexcused absence. Time to say...No, we live in the reality-based world, and we are honored to listen to the country's democratically elected President.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:13 AM    in reply to Teacher

Great comment.
Imagine the historical significance and visual symbolism for thousands of impressionable young children: that black man on television is actually the president of the United States!

Yes we can, indeed.

My fear of what these people are doing to our society is only mediated by my disgust at their ignorance and bigotry

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:04 PM    in reply to Teacher

Hopefully it will wake parents up to the far-right religionuts' ongoing stealth efforts to take over the public school system and reduce its text to only one: the "bible".

We know the history of parents NOT attending PTA meetings; NOT attending open school board meetings. And now they wonder why the miniscule religionut minority is able to subvert public education for wholly anti-American ends?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 4:24 AM   

Why do they hate America?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:13 PM    in reply to fpie

"They hate us for our freedoms." -- G. W. Bushit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 5:48 AM   

In light of the upheaval surrounding the President speaking to America's schoolchildren today, I found this article which shows a rather obvious "double-standard":

FROM THE ARTICLE: "Leave Our Kids Alone!"

Since the beginning of time, Presidents have given of themselves to speak to students in person and via the media. President George Bush and President Ronald Reagan both gave nationally televised speeches aimed specifically at American students. In 1989, Bush delivered a televised anti-drug speech, while Reagan delivered a 1986 commencement and Q&A session which was beamed over public television into 171 school districts. At the time, those speeches were never an issue and parents were happy their children could receive the attention of the leader of the free world. Never once in history has any school district or collective group of parents taken the position they DO NOT want their children hearing ANY message from the President of the United States...until now!

FULL ARTICLE: http://okwassup.blogspot.com


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 7:35 AM   

Just where do we think all the racists in the country went after Obama was elected? Thinking that, it isn't so difficult to explain the "We want our country back!"whack-jobs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 8:53 AM   

Let's see now......

There are literally thousands of school districts....

Yet somehow, at TPM. the 7 listed above are suddenly a 'growing number'......

Pardon me while I chuckle.

Another tempest in a teapot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:19 PM    in reply to GayIthacan

It is only a tempest in a teapot to those who haven't been awake and following the motives and methods of the far-right religionuts to by stealth take over and destroy the public education system.

You'll even find the anti-public education view and rhetoric on the perceivedly-mainstream (it isn'y actually: despite the occasional liberal author, most of the articles are by far-right ultra-nationalists) "antiwar.com" coming from "Libertarians".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:04 AM   

Hmmm let's see, what would happen if you told your 12yo daughter in no uncertain terms to NOT watch that speech by that cool smooth talking black President?

She's gonna watch. 17 TIMES

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:25 AM   

I'm pretty sure that this whole uproar is just meant to lay the groundwork for the Republicans to introduce "The Freedom From Information Act."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:52 AM    in reply to AKHunter

Good one!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:26 AM   

Except for two in PA. (both in conservative/blue-collar areas), note that all of the districts mentioned are southern or from the state that elected John McCain to the senate and is home to the Viper militia group.

No surprise, merely more proof that the Wingers and the GOP represent a fringe, regional element of America. Loud and obnoxious, yes, but busy discrediting itself. I say we buy them more rope.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:44 AM    in reply to Goshen

Sorry to burst your bubble, but they're not showing it in Greenwich, CT, either.

Fringe, my ass.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:30 AM    in reply to Dorn76

Compared to the rest of America, Greenwich IS fringe. It is almost entirely extremely wealthy WASP, Wall St Journal fringe types. Definitely not indicative of mainstream USA.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:25 PM    in reply to Shrubbit

That's what needs to be done: marginalize the miniscule minority of the wealthy so they can no longer hide behind teh appearance of being mainstream.

And while we're at it, push the minority percentage that is the business/corporate sector back into its proper limits.

I'm fed up with nbboth of those tresspassing into the territory properly occupied by the majority/sane.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:28 AM   

The most pathetic aspect of this story is that Obama and his milquetoast team still think they can appease and work with these people.

For proof of this sad reality just watch him capitulate on the public option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:28 PM    in reply to tommyo

Pseudo-intellectual -- fashionable -- cyncism rears its head to smugly predict the unknowable future.

And to publicly express its excuse for not contributing constructively.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:28 AM   

The importance of this maneuver is being grossly underestimated. It amounts to de facto secession. Expect more of the same.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:35 PM    in reply to hquain

You're talking about people who are already pretty much disengaged from the system. The're just making it loudly known that they don't, but are (as is typical across the political spectrum) adopting a new "reason" for their disengagement.

But I agree that this isn't a tempest in a teapot: it's much more important as a continuing phenomenon (these are essentially the same people who mouthed off about Clinton, from the very beginning of his first term), and needs to be watched because its the increased intensity and the deliberate whipping-up of the hysteria to new heights.

There's no doubt racism is central to it. But more generally it is hatred of "liberals," whatever and whoever they are: Coulter, as example, has been talking up killing "liberals" for longer than Obama has been on the scene.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:44 AM   

Every one of these explanations is complete bullshit. How does "stay in school" not fit into your fuckin' curriculum?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:40 PM    in reply to Scientific

Agreed.

Apparently some teachers are afraid to stand up for education against the bigots who have infiltrated their school boards.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:46 AM   

Not only does this make me boiling mad on a conceptual level, I'm starting to take it personally. Where were these pious, liberty-loving, children-protecting wingnuts when my HS marching band was forced to play at a Nixon event? In 1973? No trace of controversy with that presidency, oh no, not at all.

I still remember the band director saying that no matter what our politics were, we were going anyway out of respect for the office of the Presidency.

The more I think about it, the more inclined I am to drive to one of those school districts and beat the crap out of someone, just to make myself feel better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

KZ

user-pic

September 8, 2009 11:01 AM    in reply to junkmailqueen

Can I come?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 9:52 AM   

This is probably the best evidence that many Repugs are just delusional, desperate and just scared to death of Obama for no rational reason.

As the Whitehouse press secretary said, "If one student in one school goes from a D to a C (as a result of the speech)it would have worth the effort"

Well said. Makes the Repugs effort on this fall flat like a dead cat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:01 AM   

It's funny how successfully Republicans have managed to disguise their true motivations.

If you simply take the meat of what they argue, and put it all together, you realize that they're simply bigots.

What does "small-town values" really mean? It means "we're bigoted against anyone who isn't from a small town like us".

What does it mean, to always interpret the words of your opponents in the worst possible light, while always interpreting the words of your partners in the best possible light? It's called being bigoted.

Republicans are bigots. Their arguments aren't based on logic or reason or precedent: they simply say whatever is necessary to say at that time to boost their fellow Republicans.

What a coincidence that these are the same people who assume(d) that blacks are inferior, that women ought not to vote, that Straussian notions of "one set of facts for the masses, another set of facts for the elite" are AOK, etc...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:51 PM    in reply to Clavis

One thing is certainly true of each and every one of them: they are functionally illiterate anti-intellectuals who wouldn't know the meaning of "intellectual honesty," and reject reason itself. These individuals are too damned lazy to get off their asses and get an education, and they are about exercising the little power they have to keep their kids as stupid as they are, as validation of their "values".

Another sad part of it is that they feel powerless -- and rightly should: reason, not loud-mouthed stupidity, should rule -- but are being hoddwinked by a far-right that is exploiting their powerlessness on the false promise of empowering them.

And what is the nature of that "empowerment"? Hate, and scream, along with the movie actor who shouted, "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!"

The problem is that no solution is offered:

"You're not going to take it anymore? Then what are you going to do differently?"

So they, as Mark Twain put it, being "drunk on someone else's cork," are -- so far -- "taking it out in blowin'".

As we've already seen -- the G. Gordon Liddy stirring up a person who shot at the White House. A person who shot up the CIA building -- this decerebrated/unhinged and unfounded rage is dangerous to "play" with --

William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!

Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!

More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?

This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down . . . do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? . . . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:16 AM   

139,000 public school districts. Do the math.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:19 AM   

And then these are the same people that will turn right around and say that Obama is not doing enough to help kids and our schools.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:56 PM    in reply to mk3872

No, they won't, because they don't WANT him to, as their opposition to their kids hearing a speech, content unknown, for "reasons" that aren't in the speech.

All they can imagine is that the black kids will be "empowered" to act as they perceive urban blacks acting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:20 AM   

I just hope someone is keeping track of these nimrod districts, to make sure they don't expose the delicate minds of their students to any speeches by future Republican presidents -- assuming there are any.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:23 AM   

I think the resistance to this speech is probably motivated by politics and race, but I also think that this is being blown out of proportion. Seven to ten schools does not equate to "more and more."

All that being said I also think that school districts should not just roll over and let any politician hijack their classrooms. Although the President's inspirational message is wholesome and lovely, it not directed towards anyone's curriculum and therefore is an interupption of the schoolday.

What is most ironic about this is if he had been more partisan and issue oriented, if for instance he tried to explain the effort to reform Health care the speech would definately have an educational value to the students and their teachers. Unfortunately he's interuupting morning Math, Reading, History and Science classes to tell kids what they've heard countless times from teachers, counselors and parents.

this speech should televised during the family hour.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:02 PM    in reply to blairza

"Hijacked" by an ELECTED public official who has responsibility concerning education?

And it would be "educational" if it were about, say, health insurance reform? And the parents who oppose THAT are going to approve?

You mean educational like Reagan's speech to school kids about tax cuts -- his partisan political agenda -- for the wealthy being good for everyone else?

And so waht if the parents and teachers and school officals have told them to stay in school and do well? Would it hurt for the President to show interest in their achieving that end?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:23 AM   

He should have just read "My Pet Goat".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:25 AM   

Did all these schools also not broadcast the speeches to students
given by every President going back to Jimmy Carter?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:35 AM   

Hey! It's about time the Little Communists heard from Dear Leader!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:04 PM    in reply to wbgonne

"Man. this is a stupid, stupid country."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:39 AM   

Man. this is a stupid, stupid country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:58 AM    in reply to impik

The Idiocracy rules in some areas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:42 AM   

What's next? Kids can opt out of homework or tests because their teacher belongs to a socialist union?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:08 PM    in reply to FreeForAll

Can we teach that Stalin was a bloody-handed mass-murdering tyrant? Or would that be "teaching about" "Communism"?

I'd ask why Republican'ts are stuck in the 1950s pining for Joe McCarthy, but someone would point out that their also stuck in the 1930s pining for Hoover. And in the anti-labor 1920s. . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:44 AM   

For those few or many schools that are not showing the President's speech to children...what those administrators are are really saying is : Ignorance is BLISS...goodness sakes, we surely don't want an educated populous, then all the rhetoric would be useless as the fraudulent statements would be ridiculed rather than believed.

It is unfortunate that in this country where a major political party (GOP) has devolved into a state in which FEAR is the overriding principle on which they stand. For them to succeed, they need to keep the populous ignorant of the facts. This action is the point in fact.

Any school that refuses their students access to this President's address needs to be held accountable for their actions. Say what they may, this is repression of information.
Isn't that "reverse brainwashing".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:00 AM    in reply to afisher

Wait'll Texas gets to determine what the nation's students read in textbooks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:18 PM    in reply to afisher

It is a authoritarian prevention of competition by those who purport to believe in the "free market" and competition.

They are, you see, exercising their right of free speech -- by denying the President exercising his right of free speech.

The First Amendment protects the right to speak freely without being attacked or penalized for doing so. But watch: the trolls will attempt to sidestep that fact by engaging in character assassination based upon the President exercising his right of free speech.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:57 AM   

It's not just the red states doing this. Schaumburg IL is letting parents opt their children out of viewing the video. The superintendent said only about 8 parents complained and that he thought the speech was great.
Just north of Schaumburg, McHenry County officials said that it didn't "fit their curriculum", so they aren't showing it. McHenry is a predominately red county in northern Illinois.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 10:57 AM   

"OK, kids, you're not going to be seeing the speech because that uppity negro isn't OUR president. Now, let's start the school day by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:02 AM   

Would be interesting to correlate student academic performance at schools opting out and those opting in.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:07 AM   

This is all part of an effort to de-legitimize Obama. And we all know why that might resonate with parts of the country. Still, one wonders how many of the nation's school districts are opting out. Is it 1% or 10%?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:28 PM    in reply to rhallnj

And in that it isn't racist: Clinton was a Democrat, and not black.

Then again, he was said to be "the first African-American preisdent".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:10 AM   

This whole school imbroglio is the most shocking bit of raw attack on their own country I've yet seen from the Republicans. If the President can't tell kids to stay in school, what kind of democracy does America actually have? What's the point of having elections if Republicans won't accept the results and will, in fact, work to undermine the government's ability to function.

It's anti-American, anti-education, anti-child and, of course, eyebrow-deep in raw racism. Personally I think it's close to sedition.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:24 PM    in reply to Bullsmith

They're still fighting the Civil War (this is not news to those of us who've been watching these loons for several decades). What they're trying to do is to push someone else to shoot first so they can pretend, as they did with the assassination of Dr. Tiller, they are innocent of that they are fomenting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:34 AM   

We WON! - Lebanon Township, Hunterdon County New Jersey

Massive local letter writing in an strong right-wing district had these suckers back down. Previous statement 9/4/09

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:25 PM    in reply to meeque

Good pushback!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:34 AM   

the central texas mouth breathers are screeching about "local control !"

but are mysteriously silent when I mention NCLB

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:29 PM    in reply to izzatxeaux

For those not in Tejas: What in hell is "NCLB"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 11:57 AM   

It's rather ironic that these idiots are claiming the speech is an attempt to brainwash kids. We were all raised with the notion of respecting the Office of the President, if not the president himself. There was always a wall of presidential portraits in all the schools I went to. And so the irony here is that it is these wackos who are trying to do the brainwashing (with the help of the MSM) by politicizing even the most benign action by the President. These freaks are consciously trying to instill a notion of distrust and cynicism in young people for the very Office of the President. It used to take an unjust war or a draft to do that. Now it only takes a black president.

Also, I keep hearing that when Reagan and Bush 1 addressed students there where objections from Democrats, but I never hear any details. Does anyone recall the details from then? I was certainly not very politically aware back then, but I don't recall this level of idiocy.

One last thing. When Bush 2 was prez, I used to think how amazing it would be for him to give a speech directed toward young people and specifically address young black men and say something like, "you are a valuable member of society, this country respects and needs everyone of you." Of course that didn't happen, but I suspect it is that sort of outrageous radicalism that the Right is terrified of.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 12:27 PM   

Horribly, our superintendat left a mumbling message on parents' phones last night, declaring that our public schools will not show the speech in real time, but rather will review it for educational content and possibly (but by the sound of it not likely) show it in the future. This is in Massachusetts! A number of parents are writing emails and calling his office, but it's too late... Our town (Waltham) voted for Obama in a
landslide. Lots of very angry parents here - will bring this up at
the next School Committee meeting no doubt.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:08 PM    in reply to dimitry

It's "too late" because those parents haven't been paying attention to the attacks on the public educational system.

Those parents should wake up and get off their asses and attend PTA and open schoolboard meetings in order to counter the lunatic fringe minority.

And this is the perfect incitement: not only attend the next schoolboard meeting furious, but find out who on the schoolboard opposed having the students watch the speech, and shove the speech down their throats.

And shove the speech down the assinine and cowardly school superintendent's throat.

Where's the outrage? Here's the opportunity to be legitimately outraged about something real.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 1:49 PM    in reply to JNagarya

We are not on our asses, thanks...

There was no opportunity for public input into what was announced as policy the night before the speech.

That is something that will be brought up at the next school committee meeting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:12 PM    in reply to dimitry

Then how did those who oppose the kids seeing the speech -- which is without question the view of a miniscule minority --manage to get their views communicated to the superintendent in time, and to such degree that it was sufficient for her/him to make the decision made, whereas the counter -- majority -- view didn't get communicated until "too late"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 2:31 PM    in reply to JNagarya

I am not sure. I suspect the superintendant had personal political motivations, but don't know that for certain.

It is unrealistic to expect automatic preventive mobilzations on every issue. I think many parents in democratic school districts did not expect their school leadership to either buckle under sureptitiosly or to press their own conservative views on the district.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 8, 2009 12:48 PM   

I am ashamed to say that I live in the Tredyffin/Easttown School District, a suburban district outside of Philadelphia, where they have announced that they will not show the speech live, but will let their teachers review it to "see if it fits in their curriculum". I just sent an email to our superintendent and school board asking them how a speech from the President of the United States urging children to work hard and stay in school does not fit into the curriculum of ANY child? I am beyond furious that a school district in a wealthy area - our high school has been ranked in the top 100 nationally on many occasions - can be so stupid. I will be attending my first school board meeting in the very near future.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on