TPMDC

More Details Emerge From Christie 2002 Car Accident


Former US Attorney Chris Christie

Read More

NJ-GOV

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

I have now reviewed the police report from Republican former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie's car accident in 2002, when the then-U.S. Attorney and current nominee for Governor of New Jersey struck a motorcyclist while going the wrong direction on a one-way street in Elizabeth, New Jersey.

As the Star-Ledger reported, the accident happened when Christie was on his way to attend the swearing-in of the Union County prosecutor in Elizabeth, when he hit motorcyclist Andrew Mendonca.

From the police report:

Veh #1 [Christie] states he was traveling west on Murray St. and was lost. He reached Chilton St. The light was red so he inched forward attempting to make a right on red but never saw the one-way traffic sign. He then stopped upon observing oncoming traffic, Veh #2 [Mendonca] also braked. The motorcycle fell on its side and slid into his vehicle. Veh #2 states he was traveling on Chilton St. when Veh #1 turned in front of him.

Christie's vehicle was then towed away by the police, according to the report, while Mendonca's motorcycle was also taken away by a private tow truck.

As the Star-Ledger reported, Mendonca was then taken to University Hospital in Newark -- a curious detail, as that hospital is several miles away from the street corner where the accident took place. Another hospital, Trinitas, was conveniently located just a few blocks away.

The Associated Press contacted Mendonca, who declined to comment.

The most peculiar thing here is that Christie was clearly at fault by turning the wrong way onto a one-way street, but was not ticketed. The Star-Ledger asked the local police director whether Christie's position as U.S. Attorney -- and he did identify himself to the police officer -- was a factor in his not being cited. The police director's answer: "I don't think I want to make that kind of deduction, but I think the facts speak for themselves."

TPM sent multiple requests for comment to the Christie campaign about the incident, which have not been answered. Attempts to contact the police officer, Rafael Vasques, as well as Police Director James Cosgrove and victim Andre Mendonca were similarly unsuccessful.

Join the Conversation!

10 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

September 4, 2009 6:32 PM   

Intrepid reporter!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 7:34 PM   

Excellent reporting. As far as the University Hospital comment, I don't think there is anything strange in that. Its an excellent trauma center and its where a lot of accidents go. I think he is lucky to have gone there rather than Trinitas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 8:40 PM   

This was a public incident, and the response was handled by public employees during the times when they were on duty. Everything about it is a matter of public record. How can they "not comment"? Somebody file a FOIA.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 9:44 PM   

'The most peculiar thing here is that Christie was clearly at fault by turning the wrong way onto a one-way street, but was not ticketed. The Star-Ledger asked the local police director whether Christie's position as U.S. Attorney -- and he did identify himself to the police officer -- was a factor in his not being cited. The police director's answer: "I don't think I want to make that kind of deduction, but I think the facts speak for themselves."'

Not that peculiar, I think.

I was in court on Wednesday to contest a moving violation in El Cerrito California.

Localities in California are hurting for money and are sending cops out in force to write tickets.

I was lucky--the cop who wrote me up didn't show, so the violation was dismissed--but I had to sit through two hours of other people's cases, and some were pretty outrageous.

In one, some obviously poor, Spanish-speaking guy was ticketed for not having a tarp over some (tied down) barrels of recycles in the back of his truck.

He may have made twenty dollars on the recycling. The ticket? Three hundred and some dollars; with driving school, close to four hundred. (In CA you have to do driving school or else your car insurance goes way up.)

The worst was a guy (again, Hispanic) who was actually ticketed for jaywalking. Ninety-five dollars. I have been an agressive jaywalker for decades. Never been cited once, but then I am white.

IMO both of these guys should have been given warnings only. And if they got to court, the judge should have let them off. He didn't.

That governments are balancing the budget this way is shocking. What makes it even worse is that we know from incidents like the one involving Christie that "VIPs" who could actually afford to pay these tickets never get ticketed in the first place, even when their infractions cause injury to others.

Grrrr.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 6, 2009 1:22 AM    in reply to Nancy Irving

The fact that someone who broke the law was held accountable regardless of his personal financial situation is something you consider outrageous? Really? Do you think that justice is only for the wealthy, and that a more just system would let poor people off with just a warning?
What an odd world view.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 9, 2009 1:05 AM    in reply to nwgal

So, I'm a reasonably well-off middle-class lawyer. If I drive 15 MPH over the speed limit because I'm trying to get to day care to pick up my kid before they charge me an extra $30 for being late, and I get caught, they'll fine me $300, which might mean that my wife and I might stay home and have a nice grilled salmon dinner next Friday night instead of trying that new French place with the really great wine list. If a Hispanic guy who works at a car wash drives 15 MPH over the speed limit because he's trying to get to day care to pick up his kid because he just flat-out doesn't HAVE $30 for a late fee, and will have to quit his job if his kid doesn't have day care, they'll also fine him $300, which will mean that he won't be able to afford the rent next month and will face eviction. That's perfectly fair, right? That's equality before the law in its grandest and most glorious form. We both committed exactly the same crime, so we're both punished precisely equally: I miss out on trying out that great little pinot I've been hearing so much about; he loses his home. Is there anything at all wrong with this perfectly fair, perfectly just, perfectly equal system?

"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor, to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets and to steal bread." Anatole France.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 12:02 AM   

Dig deeper! The nature of a cover-up is, something is covered up. He probably claims to be a fiscal conservative (Sanford, Jindal,)to boot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 11:54 AM    in reply to Leftflank

My question would be: "Was anyone else in the car when the accident occurred?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 2:37 AM   

Unfortunately, this sort of corruption is all-too common in American law enforcement. In many police departments, the unwritten S.O.P. is: cops don't ticket cops (or other law enforcement officials).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 27, 2009 4:16 PM   

The Christie campaign will go down in history as one of the worst-run political campaigns of recent years...a candidate with all sorts of advantages, but who seemed to have an anti-Midas touch, where everything with which he came in contact turned to crud. If at this point he does manage to win, it will be in spite of himself.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on