TPMDC

New Jersey Poll: Birthers, Truthers, And The Anti-Christ -- Oh, My!

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


President Barack Obama

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

My home state of New Jersey is one crazy place, according to the new survey of the state by Public Policy Polling (D).

Dave Weigel points out that one out of every three New Jersey conservatives think that Obama could be the anti-Christ. To be precise, 18% of self-identified conservatives affirmatively say that Obama is the anti-Christ, with 17% not sure. Among the self-identified Republican label, it's 14% who say Obama has the number 666 hidden underneath his hair, plus 15% who aren't sure.

But oh it gets even worse on some other questions -- among both the right and the left.

It turns out that 33% of New Jersey Republicans say that Obama was not born in the United States, plus 19% in the Birther-Curious undecided category.

But Democrats shouldn't be too eager to laugh at this. On the other side of the political spectrum, there's some significant 9/11 Trutherism among Dem voters. We've got 32% of Jersey Democrats who say that George W. Bush had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. In addition, another 19% of Jersey Dems are Truther-Curious, in the undecided column.

So that's only 48% of Jersey Republicans who definitively are not Birthers, and 49% of Dems who are officially not Truthers. Don't you just love our polarized politics?

Join the Conversation!

85 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

September 16, 2009 12:52 PM   

I wouldn't meet the criteria of "conservative," but if a pollster asked me such a silly-ass question, I'd also respond "Oh yeah, definitely the anti-Christ. Without a doubt."

Of course if the follow-up involved where Obama was born, I'd respond "third planet in Epsilon-Boötes." But that's just me.

If the pollster missed the sarcastic tone in my voice, well...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:49 PM    in reply to Mad Dog Rackham

On behalf of Third Planet ex-pats everywhere, I take exception to your remarks sir! lol

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:15 PM    in reply to Mad Dog Rackham

No, he's from the 6th planet out from Eta Carinae. His mom got him out of there before the star started going ballistic getting ready to blow up. Rumor has it that Obama wears spandex under his suit and has a cape. But don't quote me on that part.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 12:56 PM   

Are you equating a belief that Obama is the anti-Christ with a doubt concerning the official explanation of the events of 9/11? That seems a stretch.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:27 PM    in reply to out of the loop

In addition, depending on the wording of the question, Bush did sort of have prior knowledge of the possibility of the attacks... "Bin Laden determined to strike wihin the U.S." laid it out for him had he bothered to pay attention...

To be clear though, I am not a "truther"... I mean, I appreciate the truth and all, but conspiracy theories are not my thing... must be why I don't like Glenn Beck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 7:25 AM    in reply to jenzinoh

Bush & Co absolutely were forewarned about 9/11. They knew 'radical Islamists' wanted to attack the US using planes as missiles. Condi Rice lied when she said 'no one imagined...' it's all laid out in detail at:
250+ 9/11 Smoking Guns:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/911smokingguns.html

See also
Bush Family's Partnership with Killers of Americans: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_carlyle.html

The US is controlled by the bankers/Federal Reserve. Since their refusal to impeach Bush that leaves us with few options.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:09 PM    in reply to out of the loop

Eric,

I try to avoid piling on, but this article was very sloppy. As many others have pointed out, there is plenty of uncertainty about the way the questions were posed. I've gone to the links and the PPP home page. Nowhere did I find even something as revealing as the friggin' questions, AS ASKED. I live in the Garden State too and I'm not buying these numbers at all!

According to the website, PPP surveyed 500 likely New Jersey voters from September 11th to 14th. The survey’s
margin of error is +/-4.5%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.

Really! I realize this startup (2006) pollster is Democratic leaning and they may have had some accuracy in some state polls, last election. However, the fact that I have no idea just WHAT they were polling on, the fact that they rely on automated, robo-calls for their polling and the, to me, ludicrous equivalency assumed between birthers and truthers, however many of the latter may actually deserve the appellation, means I assign this poll about as much confidence as I have in Tom Delay dancing away with the top prize in So you Think You can Dance.

Can we work with meaningful polls, please? This article was pure dreck!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 12:57 PM   

Isn't the 911 question a bit loaded though? I had thought that the White House was warned that an attack was imminent, and even that planes might be involved? If this is true, then technically, the Bush White house was warned, but they chose to not address those warnings.

While I think it's preposterous to believe that Bush knew exactly what was going to happen, and allowed it to happen, I do believe they knew something was going to happen, and they didn't take those threats seriously enough.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:21 PM    in reply to jpaese

I think that is a fair point that there could have been confusion on the part of the survey responders.

The question reads: "Do you think that George W. Bush had
advance knowledge of the 9/11 terrorist
attacks?"

It is certainly plausible that many people could have thought this would include the "Bin Laden Determined to Attack..." memo. I doubt that was what the question was really referring to but they left it open to interpretation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:33 PM    in reply to JohnAH

I agree; as a New Jersey native I was appalled by the truther-ness of the state, but realized that I'd have a tough time with that question too. I'm not sure what the standard is. No, I don't think that Bush knew about the specific plan, but I also disagree with Condy Rice's assertion that they could never have anticipated the very thing their intelligence warned them about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:41 PM    in reply to jpaese

why is it preposterous?

I'm agnostic as I don't think we will ever know the full truth, but I don't get how you can be so sure of yourself. That sounds like Plato's double ignorance to me ("simple ignorance" being the mere lack of information, and "double ignorance" being the absence of knowledge coupled with the delusion of having genuine knowledge).

Is it preposterous for you because no human ever would do such a thing? Is it preposterous because George W was too sensitive to human pain or suffering, like when he mocked carla fay tucker or ordered a war responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of iraqis?

you have heard of Operation Northwoods, a nifty little pentagon plan from nearly 50 years ago, right?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:58 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

For those loathe to click off-site links, even to wikipedia...

Operation Northwoods

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".

This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba.

The plan stated:

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by then-Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense.

Several other proposals were listed, including the real or simulated actions against various U.S military and civilian targets. Operation Northwoods was part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project (Operation Mongoose) anti-Castro initiative. It was never officially accepted or executed.

Those who feel so self-assured that they know what happened on 9/11 and enjoy mocking doubters, or "truthers," are painfully naive and gullible. That includes Erik here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:42 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

Got two words for ya: Battleship Maine.

As a Garden State resident I'm not surprised, we've got more yahoos per sq. mile than any other state, even Flori-duh!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 6:12 PM    in reply to jpaese

Exactly. Why is saying Bush had advanced notice a Truther statement? We need to see the question in it's exact form. To me, a PDR with the title "bin Laden determined to attack within the US" (or however it was exactly stated) is advance knowledge. Not exactly Truther territory by any means.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:01 PM   

thinking bush had "advanced knowledge" of 9/11 doesn't necessarily mean you're a truther. i mean, he DID have advance knowledge of the attack. he had a memo ON HIS DESK called "bin laden determined to attack in the us."

that doesn't count as having "advanced knowledge"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:01 PM   

Pineys!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:36 PM    in reply to Moose49

Exactly. The NJ hillbillies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:05 PM   

Eric - is this "our polarized politics" as you state ... or, is this an indication of 2 more fundamental American societal issues:

1. Our education system stinks and people are not being sufficiently educated

2. Our 4th estate, the media, is not sufficienlty doing their jobs

The MSM and our school system leaders should look at these results and be ashamed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:26 PM    in reply to mk3872

Thanks for the comment mk, that's what I am always trying to point out to people when the Evolution question comes up with conservatives. It is really more a problem of education and a general lack of curiosity that leaves so many people in the stone age. Tragically the right wing WANTS to push religion over science and myth over fact, so it makes it just that much harder to get some common sense out there. I definitely think the MSM should have it's ass kicked for always giving stupidity an equal footing with facts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:00 PM    in reply to mk3872

3. 60 years of television has eaten away our already woefully limited capacity for critical thinking.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:05 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Agree. It's given the general public a severe case of ADD, exemplified by the 24 hr. news cycle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:09 PM    in reply to Schmed

Heck, I'd sell my s . . . ushi to have a 24 hour news cycle again instead of the one hour cycle we have today.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:07 PM   

I'd be more interested in comparing the % of people who think Obama is the anti-Christ to those who think he is the second coming of Jesus himself; seems like a closer analogy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:15 PM    in reply to PeninsulaMatt

Good point PeninsulaMatt.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:44 PM    in reply to PeninsulaMatt

I think he's better than Jesus.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 10:09 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Jesus couldn't sink the three

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:09 PM   

Hey Eric,
Congrats on copying the worst argument Nate Silver has made in recent months. The problem with that analysis is that the questions on Bush having "advance notice" puts the Truthers in with people who consider the Bin Laden Determined to Attack in US memo "advanced notice," a group that includes myself and tons of others considering the timing and specificity of that report. And of course, it is true that said memo exists and that it was given to Dubya.

The Anti-Christ and Birther stuff is based 100% on BS, whether it comes from people of power or the innate paranoia and crazy of some people.

Equating or juxtaposing the two groups is either bad faith or incompetence.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:02 PM    in reply to drhgl19

Equating or juxtaposing the two groups is either bad faith or incompetence.

New Jersey might be a weird and polarized state, as Erik says, but New Jersey was also directly affected by 9/11, and wouldn't it be entirely possible that residents of New Jersey may have paid closer attention to the stories about "Bin laden determined to strike"? If so, the equation of these two groups is really stupid.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:50 PM    in reply to CT Voter

I'm afraid "really stupid" is the right term for this. This is what happens, Eric, when you stretch too far for some "macro view" -- you lose your footing and fall into sillyland.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:13 PM   

I’m concerned about the wide prevalence of the Birther – Truther [right and left are the same] meme and the suggestion that large segments of both the right and the left are crazy. The Obama Birther myth has been widely debunked, and so have the Truther conspiracies about CIA involvement, etc.

However, reporting on the “Truther” prevalence fails to mention widespread publicity on the pre-9/11 memos and intelligence information that was “discounted by the Bush White House (“Bin Laden determined to strike in the US,” etc.). Is it possible that inelegantly written survey questions may lead some respondents to answer “George W. Bush had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks,” based on that assumption [of intelligence reports ignored], without actually buying into the Truther nonsense about a U.S. government plan?

This is probably a question for Nate Silver or someone with like experience, but it bothers me that we may be classifying a whole group of folks as “Truthers,” who don’t subscribe to the tenets of that cult. Please don’t continue to contribute to the “he said – she said-ification” of our discourse with what are potentially false equivalencies without further inquiry and informed research.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:33 PM    in reply to M Torrens

Well stated M Torrens.

Bush initially did not want to have any investigation of 9/11 because he said it would interfere with his 'protecting us'. The 'Jersey Moms' who lost family members and forced the investigation to find out what we did or did not know or do on or before 9/11 could be similarly unjustly denigrated for their feeling that the government with all the billions spent on security did not appear to do a damn thing on 9/11 to mitigate casualties or to have done a damn thing before 9/11 to prevent it. As it turned out there were a number of red flags coming form the FBI in the field in Phoenix and Rowley in MN, along with the bin Laden alert hand delivered to Bush while he was on a month long vacation acting to politicize stem cell rules in Crawford.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:34 PM   

You really need to put these numbers in context: New Jersey is hardly a conservative bastion, which suggests conservatives as a group in the Garden State are likely to be among the hardest of the hard core.

I'm guessing that a disproportionate number of them (compared to a more homogeneously conservative state like, say, Texas) are Christian anti-abortion fanatics -- a demo somewhat prone to seeing the Anti-Christ lurking around every corner.

Also, the poll was of likely voters in this fall's NJ gubernatorial race, and we all know how jazzed up the Republican base is right now.

Bottom line: According to the poll, only 8% of the entire sample thought Obama was the Anti-Christ.

Which is bad, but frankly not as wacky as the 19% who thought George Bush had advance knowledge of 9/11. Anyone who saw the video of him sitting in that classroom in Florida, staring vacantly into space, paralyzed with fear, should know how absurd that particular conspiracy theory is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:39 PM    in reply to Peter Principle

He had the same look I had on my face when I looked over a calculus test and couldn't comprehend a single problem. Fear of getting a bad grade in the future coupled with shame of not having prepared properly in the past combined to make a moment of sheer paralysis.

Gee, I wonder if there's a comparison to be made here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:36 PM   

Bush was warned that bin Laden was "determined to attack inside the united states", the FBI had solid info that bin Laden was planning to use airplanes as weapons, they knew that New York and D.C. were likely targets, and an FBI agent warned the bureau in summer 2001 that Zacarias Moussaoui "could fly something into the World Trade Center."

Now this isn't the same as saying that Bush was warned that bin Laden was determined to have Zacarias Moussaoui organize an attack on D.C. and NYC, specifically targeting the World Trade center and using airplanes as weapons. But the pieces were there, and the Clinton people were running around with their hair on fire, and then Bush's counterterrorism task force met a total of zero times prior to 9/11, because he was too excited about conflict with Russia and Iraq. But it also beggars belief to claim that 9/11 was a completely unpredictable surprise.

And it is light-years away from claiming that Obama is a supernatural being, satan incarnate! Jesus christ, how can you make such a comparison with a straight face? I guess it's because religious people are given a free pass for batsh*t insanity in this country, but seriously: they believe he is the living, breathing Prince of Darkness, and that he will bring about the apocalypse within the next three or seven years, during which :

1) All the Fundies will flout into the sky

2) the Jews will be struck down by an angry God

3) The remaining heretics and infidels will be killed by Satan's minions and sent to eternal torment in Hell

4) Jesus will then return to Israel, along with the Fundies, if I recall correctly, and everyone will live forever.

And this is equated with a belief that Bush could have paid more attention to a memo. Yeah, okay. That's fair enough for Fox News, by golly!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:38 PM   

But where do they stand on the "Jersey Devil", urban legend, or the real deal?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Devil

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:45 PM   

bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

republicans are soooo stupid haha

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:48 PM   

There's no need to portray this poll as something so complicated in meaning. It finds what any other poll, research project or philosophical observation has always confirmed - most people are idiots.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:49 PM   

And this birther truther comparisson is 100% bullshit.

Condi rice herself testified saying they recieved a memo prior to the attacks that said "bin laden determined to strike in US"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:01 PM    in reply to 3star2nr

Not to mention that the administration's claims that "nobody had ever thought this could happen" (regarding planes flown into buildings) were clearly BS. FFS, the two kids that did Columbine had described the exact same thing in some of their writings.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:51 PM   

President Carter says, "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he's African-American," Carter told "NBC Nightly News." "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that shares the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African-Americans."...So, at least one third of NJ wingnut conservatives are racist as well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:53 PM   

"On the other side of the political spectrum, there's some significant 9/11 Trutherism among Dem voters. We've got 32% of Jersey Democrats who say that George W. Bush had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks."

I know, that's SO crazy. I mean, who could ever think that? You'd have to be crazy to think the president responded to a daily brief titled "bin Laden determined to strike within US" with a snide "OK, you've covered your ass".

yes, just as crazy. DUH.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 1:58 PM   

To be fair to the Bush administration, they were warned that Bin Laden would attack the US with planes, but seriously, they didn't have the date, or the flight numbers so they could prevent it.
/snark off

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:04 PM   

Um, he DID have advanced knowledge. That is common knowledge, the CIA reported to Rice about it. They knew an attack was imminent. I'd probably answer "yes" to that wording as well. That DOESN'T make them Truthers. That just makes it a poorly worded poll question.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:06 PM   

Dave Weigel points out that one out of every three New Jersey conservatives think that Obama could be the anti-Christ.

What much of the New Jersey population is actually conservative?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:09 PM   

That's like comparing an apple orchard to a grain of salt. Sure they're both food but c'mon...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:15 PM   

Um, Bush did know.

"Bin Laden Determined to Attack US"

Remember that?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:15 PM   

Eric, I cannot believe u wasted actually web page space with this poll nonense.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

ibc

user-pic

September 16, 2009 2:16 PM   

hat's like comparing an apple orchard to a grain of salt. Sure they're both food but c'mon...

No, it's a fair comparison. The belief that Obama is quite literally Satan, and the belief that the Bush Administration may have not competently heeded reports of an impending domestic terrorist attack are both *equally* irrational and detestable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:53 PM    in reply to ibc

ibc - they are not fair comparisons. We know that the Bush administration had facts in its possession which, had they acted on them, could have prevented the attacks. Could have, should have, would have, I know, but it is that way because they did . . . nothing. Ergo, it had some "advance knowledge"

Obama is the anti-Christ . . . give me a break. The same number would probably agree he's Hitler / Stalin / Ho / Pol Pot / etc. reborn in one.

It's apples and concrete - no comparison.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:33 PM    in reply to consumetheconsumer

ctc, I think you missed the irony alert.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:22 PM   

The 9/11 question lumps in two very different groups of people - the liberals who think that Bush ignored all the warning signs (as pointed out in the comments above), and the hard-core crazies on both sides (but more on the far right) who think that the CIA actually demolished the buildings with explosives and that no plane crashed into the Pentagon. The latter are equivalent to Birthers, the former are not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:27 PM   

I thought Truther's believed the last administration planned and/or were directly involved in the 9/11 attacks?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:08 PM    in reply to VivaAmerica!

Yes. And evidently believing that the Bush Administration planned or was involved is the same as believing that the Bush Administration had advance notice but downgraded that information.

Get it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:28 PM   

SO if Obama is the Anti Christ
and
Obama was born in Kenya

Does that make Kenya Hell?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:38 PM   

The anti-Christ question, not certain how you can spin that - Do you believe BHO is the anti-Christ - yes, no or maybe. But, I do not believe that answering yes to a question posed as do you believe the administration had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks necessarily makes you a truther. As I understand things (and I could be wrong), the truthers not only think there was advance knowledge, they think it was kept quiet for the express purpose of allowing the attacks to take place so that all manner of craziness could occur. I have no problem with answering yes, the administration had some advance knowledge and didn't act on it. I think they just didn't focus on the threat or believe it was real -- i.e. they were basically incompetents masquerading as Real Americans Keeping the Country Safe because keeping the country safe, pre 9/11, was a campaign slogan with little meat behind it. Having some facts and intentionally not acting on them is quite the different thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:47 PM   

I have to wonder how many NJ Republicans thought Bill Clinton was the anti-Christ. Seriously, people who believe in the anti-Christ are utter morons and are likely to believe that any scary person is the anti-Christ.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:07 PM    in reply to Elrod

Well, to be honest, I was kind of keeping a wary eye on Bill Gates until he retired.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:52 PM   

They don't call it the Arm Pit of the Union for nothing!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 2:54 PM   

Damn. I've been working so fucking hard on being the anti-christ, and I probably couldn't get 5%.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 4:54 PM    in reply to Winston Smith

Buck up man. I'll vote for ya.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:05 PM   

I'm reasonably sure that if the Anti-Christ ever got himself elected president, he wouldn't have the base of his party constantly pissing and moaning about how he's not anti-christy enough. Gripe on a blog? Whoosh! Another unexplained case of spontaneous human combustion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:06 PM   

Sorry, all, I despair. This is a sad commentary on the state of the American population. The mass insanity I thought was only in the deep South of my birth seems to have spread.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:11 PM    in reply to Linda in Maryland

Well, yeah, but I've never exactly considered Jersey the Reason and Sanity Capitol of the Union.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:18 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Oh yeah? Compared to what? On behalf of a neighboring state, I am OUTRAGED at the incivility of this comment. There's decorum to be observed you southerner, you!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 8:24 PM    in reply to CT Voter

Oh yeah? Well as they say in Jersey, II got youah decorum r'at here, li'l Yankeecat. Batter dipped and deep fried, of course.

Seriously, only thing I've really got against New Jersey is that they lost one of their universities and it ended up a few miles down the road from Chapel Hill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:06 PM   

"Don't you just love our polarized politics?"

We love it and we thank you for your tireless work of fanning the birther flame.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:11 PM   

This birther, antichrist etc. stuff should not be part of educated adult conversation and devoting front page coverage to it is just feeding the beast.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:18 PM   

Anything less than 60% is just a fringe element.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:20 PM   

What kind of poll asks if anyone is the Antichrist? Why not ask about Easter Island, area 54, and about UFOs?

The "yes" answers mean either 2 things:

1, that we really need to work on rationality in our schools.
2, like Mad Dog says above, that the questions were ridiculous and elicited ridiculous answers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:25 PM   

I thought Truther's believed the last administration planned and/or were directly involved in the 9/11 attacks?
No. Truthers want independent investigations to get to the truth. There are many shades of belief/unbelief in the Truther community. Basically there are three broad categories: * The administration had some advance notice (like the memo cited above) and FAILED TO ACT. The failure may be criminal negligence or systemic failure, but in any event we need to know so it doesn't happen again. This is pretty common. * The administration knew the attacks were coming and LET THEM HAPPEN in order to attain some bigger goal (see http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf p63, then click the Statement of Principles link to see the signatories). This would be preposterous but for the Operation Northwood episode mentioned above. This is also pretty common. * The administration MADE THE ATTACKS HAPPEN. AFAIK this is the least commonly held view, but the one most widely quoted by those who wish to discredit the whole movement.

The Truther movement includes many, many professionals who have professional interest in an independent investigation. For example, firefighters, architects, and builders want a better, more convincing explanation of why WTC Building 7 fell down, as it is still the only steel-frame high-rise to collapse as a result of fire. That is important information for their livelihoods. Wanting specific answers does not make them equivalent to those who believe a majority of the country just elected the antiChrist to lead us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 7:10 PM    in reply to jsgammato

Just so you don't loose any more sleep over the "mysterious" collapse of a steel frame building in a fire. THE FIRE BEGAN AS AN EXPLOSION OF JET FUEL, A VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF JET FUEL AS THE PLANE WAS FLYING TO CALIFORNIA. JET FUEL BURNS AT A VERY HIGH TEMPERATURE, BURNING THE INSULATION OFF THE STEEL BEAMS AND THEN MELTING AND WEAKENING THE STEEL TO THE POINT OF COLLAPSE. There that wasn't so scary after all was it.

The real crime here is the Bushies ignored all the warnings the Clinton people gave them and acted as arrogant assholes assuming that anything Clinton said was the opposite of the truth. Sadly we all learned the hard way how fucking stupid Bush really was about foreign threats and a good solid public investigation of his fucking stupid arrogant ass is still needed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 9:02 PM    in reply to jsgammato

Hey, nothing says sane and sober like a big giant font. Very persuasive.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 3:51 PM   

Now we know why TPM assigned Kleefeld the Kuckoo beat

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 4:00 PM   

Considerably more than a third don't believe in evolution, don't believe in global warming and generally discount science. So, being that a large percentage are demonstrably ignorant, these other beliefs of the GOP should not shock anyone. When you are under educated, gullible, easily led, aren't capable of critical thinking, and quite often bigoted, you are at a severe disadvantage when it comes to discerning truth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 4:29 PM   

I'm pretty sure that I'm pretty sure the Bush White House knew something was coming, maybe not the scale of it. Bush was conveniently out reading about his pet goat, allowing Cheney to run the show for the first days. Not even the RNC people trusted them, and subterfuge, forgery, et al are in the MO.

I would be satisfied if an investigation cleared them of it.

More troubling is that the assumption is that the anti-christ is something actual.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 4:35 PM   

Oh, I weep for my beloved New Jersey. What has happened to this once very Dem state?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 5:57 PM   

Lest we forget, MANY kooks were certain that Bill Clinton was the anti-christ. That should tell us something about that "school of thought".
What's truly sad is the amount of pure hate for Obama on the right. Pitiful!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 6:19 PM   

Weep also for our beloved United States while you are at it. Could someone remind me, what was the official explanation for the collapse of Building 7 again? And the 55 minutes between the WTC hit by a hijacked jet and Donald Rumsfeld sitting at his desk allegedly unaware when the Pentagon got hit! I have my doubts, so I guess I balance one birther-antichrister waiting for the rapture.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 6:51 PM   

I hadn't looked at the actual poll before, but it's worth pointing out that 5% of Obama voters, and 6% of self-identified Democrats, also replied that he's the anti-Christ, with similar numbers not sure. This was also an automated phone poll, not person-to-person. So theres a lot of spoofing going on with such a stupid question.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 11:09 PM   

Just so you don't loose any more sleep over the "mysterious" collapse of a steel frame building in a fire. THE FIRE BEGAN AS AN EXPLOSION OF JET FUEL, A VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF JET FUEL AS THE PLANE WAS FLYING TO CALIFORNIA. JET FUEL BURNS AT A VERY HIGH TEMPERATURE, BURNING THE INSULATION OFF THE STEEL BEAMS AND THEN MELTING AND WEAKENING THE STEEL TO THE POINT OF COLLAPSE. There that wasn't so scary after all was it.
Well, yeah, except no plane ever hit WTC7. THREE buildings fell that day: WTC1, WTC2 (the twin towers) and WTC7,a separate 47-floor office building that was never hit by a plane. And it held Mayor Rudy Giuliani's "Emergency Response Center". I just want answers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:12 PM    in reply to jsgammato

Concrete basically explodes when it gets hot enough. If there's enough other things to burn in the building then the concrete disintegrates. The steel is dead weight at that point and the building collapses. That's why WTC7 teetered for a while and collapsed late in the day after burning for a long time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 16, 2009 11:50 PM   

This is great. I'm going to show this to my friends and family. This means we can never let Republicans get back in power again. They might hoard everyone into concentration camps based on a number they pretend to see on the back of people's heads.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 12:01 AM   

Please do not confuse idiots with Republicans. There are idiot Republicans and idiot Democrats. I don't know what the idiot Democrats believe in as strongly as the idiot Republicans believe in the AntiChrist, but I am sure there is something.
Some day the Democrats will overreach and the Republicans wil come back into power. Let's at least work on getting people educated so the future of our children is in the hands of the literate, hey?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 9:11 AM   

Well, it actually makes sense if you think about it!

Jess
www.web-privacy.de.tc

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 12:20 PM   

We are awash in stupid people. This explains everything.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on