This is pretty wonky, but it's a clear sign that, though he's criticizing Republicans pretty starkly, Obama's also going the extra mile to show he's open to Republican ideas.
"[M]any in this chamber - particularly on the Republican side of the aisle - have long insisted that reforming our medical malpractice laws can help bring down the cost of health care," Obama said.
I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I have talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs. So I am proposing that we move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine. I know that the Bush Administration considered authorizing demonstration projects in individual states to test these issues. It's a good idea, and I am directing my Secretary of Health and Human Services to move forward on this initiative today.
That should mean health care reform gets 90 votes in the Senate and 402 votes in the House, right? No, I didn't think so either.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Minne sconsin
September 9, 2009 9:13 PM
This from Fox News:
How childish. What lack of respect and decorum.
As for Grassley, I see no reason to talk to that little sh*t. He should be out of the loop.
And Bachmann waving the Constitution? I'm surprised she can read it.
Words fail me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LowlyWorm
September 9, 2009 9:21 PM in reply to Minne sconsin
You know. the delegation from Georgia can just go eat shit, as far as I'm concerned. They show their low class, their low IQ, and their total piggeshness. But, this isn't something our president hasn't seen before. Do they think he has never been called a nigguh before. Disgraceful, embarrassing, but to be expected. The land of Newty Tooty.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 9, 2009 9:27 PM in reply to Minne sconsin
Read it? It's not really words for her. It's more like a relic or a talisman or some other ignorant bit superstitious rubbish. The idea that it contains ideas and values that can be discerned by reading is more of that evil liberal stuff.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rational
September 9, 2009 9:22 PM
There already areexamples of the failure of "tort" reform - California and Texas.
10 years after limitations and costs are still sky rocketing.
But don't let facts get in the way of political delusions. Espiacially when tghose delusions come with large campaign contributions attached to them
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VivaAmerica!
September 9, 2009 9:27 PM
I think this is what O is going to focus on when it comes to tort reform:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/21/2205
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 9, 2009 9:27 PM
So which state do you want to nominate for the free fire zone for incompetent doctors?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 9, 2009 9:32 PM in reply to AJM
I nominate South Carolina, Oklahoma and Alabama.
But, seriously, read the link above. I'm pretty sure that is what they're talking about. And it's not going to please Republicans. But then, what government policy does please Republicans that doesn't involve upward wealth transfer or killing foreigners and blowing up their buildings?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davidotwo
September 9, 2009 9:36 PM
It doesn't give him any more votes, but at least it takes a talking point away from conservatives.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
smartone
September 9, 2009 9:44 PM
everyone talks about Tort Reform but noone talks about AMA shielding bad doctors - doctors that should be practicing
Tort reform should happen only in exchange for easier revocation of the licenses of incompetent doctors and Doctors who commit fraud .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 9, 2009 10:25 PM in reply to smartone
Hear, hear.
If doctors did half the piss poor job of regulating their own profession that the lawyers they so hate do (or accountants or architects, or any other self-regulated profession outside the medical sphere), total payouts for malpractice claims would tumble.
Unfortunately, that wouldn't affect their malpractice premiums, because their insurers have figured out that doctors' hatred of lawyers is so extreme that they'll take any amount of screwing as long as the insurers can plausibly blame lawyers for the necessity of doing so.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mld678
September 10, 2009 11:47 AM
President Obama’s heath care promises won’t be kept. Costs will rise exponentially, NOT fall. Therefore, our taxes will be the ones to pay for it. We need to support the goal of covering all individuals through private health insurance. We are NOT prepared to turn our health system over to the government.
http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/issues/index.cfm?ID=300 .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?