TPMDC

Pelosi Promises To Post Health Care Bill For 72 Hours Before Voting


Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Accepting Republican demands, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has promised to post health care reform legislation online for 72 hours before a final vote on the bill, The Hill reports.

House Republicans, including Minority Leader John Boehner, have introduced a petition to require three days for lawmakers to read the final bill before voting. Two Democrats, Brian Baird and Walt Minnick, have also signed on. At today's press conference, Pelosi said she would "absolutely" support the petition.

A discharge petition forces a bill onto the floor without the support of leadership and needs 218 signatures to do so. But with Pelosi saying she supports legislation that would require the 72-hour window, its backers might not need the discharge petition at all.

A Senate Republican, Jim Bunning (R-KY), introduced an amendment to the Senate Finance Committee bill that would have required the same thing. It was voted down.

Comments (10) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

September 24, 2009 2:42 PM   

It's gonna take my aides at least a day to read the bill and the weekend for me to get through the Cliff's Notes version.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 2:43 PM    in reply to Dorn76

I can't be expected to read through those little tanning glasses!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 3:05 PM    in reply to Dorn76

First, they'd have to learn to read and most of them don't believe in school.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 2:46 PM   

Yes more delays that's exactly what we need.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 2:51 PM   

So the Rethugs want to read the bill before they vote "No" on it?

Reading bills wasn't important in the past. Look no further than the Patriot Act.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 3:27 PM    in reply to tiowally

The past? Jim Inhofe in the Senate admitted he wasn't going to bother to read any bill, because he's going to vote No.

Remember all that braying of "Read the bill!" at the town halls? Never mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 3:50 PM   

Boehner learned from Bunning - Bunning said he wanted the 72 hours so lobbyists could read it. Boehner lies and says it's so "lawmakers can read the final bill" before voting. Of course Boehner will then say "we need more time to read", but first things first.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 4:11 PM   

72 hours is a reasonable demand ... i doubt it will stop there.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

September 24, 2009 4:16 PM   

All House bills have passed out of committee, right? What exactly is the House health care bill currently blocking on and when should we expect to see movement?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 24, 2009 6:20 PM   

Boehner: Seventy-two HOURS? You didn't hear me right. I said seventy-two YEARS. But I'm a reasonable guy. I'd settle for only fifty years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on