TPMDC
Pelosi: "The Public Option Will Be in the Bill That Passes the House"
Share
Send to a friend!
This will come as a welcome moment of relief for House progressives and public option enthusiasts.
"I fully support the public option. The public option will be in the bill that passes the House," Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters today.
Last week, Pelosi said "This is about a goal. It's not about provisions. As long as our goal of affordability and accessibility and quality, meeting the four...goals that we have in the legislation, then we will go forward with that bill."
But all along she's been a strong proponent of the public option, and earlier in the process she insisted that a bill without a public option could not pass in the House.
Comments (11) | Join the Conversation!
Leave a comment
Follow us!
Most Popular
TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com
TPM Top News
© 2010 TPM Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Xantar
September 17, 2009 1:08 PM
Oh ok, so today Nancy Pelosi is a strong supporter of the Public Option. Duly noted.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 17, 2009 1:51 PM in reply to Xantar
No wait. YESTERDAY she was a strong supporter of the public option. Today she's supposed to be abandoning it. Or did I miss a day?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matyra
September 17, 2009 3:09 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
No, your 'today' was actually her opinion 'the day before yesterday'. Get a grip, man!
What this means, I think, is that we'll get a public option from the House bill, but that she won't be completely against negotiating with whatever the Senate churns out when it gets to the compromise bill?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 17, 2009 3:32 PM in reply to matyra
Not buyin' it. She hasn't advocated the use of nuclear weapons against anyone who would vote for a bill without a public option. That's a signficant tell.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 3:56 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
But she did remove the DCCC missile shield from their districts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matyra
September 17, 2009 4:16 PM in reply to markg8
Bah, the technology wasn't quite there anyway. It handled the Bachmanns of the world, but Republicans who could doublespeak with some fluency could still get through.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 4:56 PM in reply to matyra
You think Blue Dogs know the technology doesn't work? That's the beauty of it!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dragnet
September 17, 2009 2:25 PM
I believe her. The Baucus bill has been savaged on the left and the right. SO why not just give us liberals what we wanted?? Either way, we're going to be passing it all by ourselves.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ThinkerT
September 17, 2009 2:30 PM
Look closely at what she said:
"I fully support the public option. The public option will be in the bill that passes the House,"
Note that once the bill passes the House, it goes into the conference committee, and then a joint bill from that committee is voted on by both houses. There's nothing in that statement that says the final bill will contain a public option, nor that a public option is needed in the final bill to pass; only that the initial one from the House will.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
September 17, 2009 3:07 PM in reply to ThinkerT
Yes, that's also exactly the point on which some key members of the putative Progressive Block have also been disconcertingly wobbly. Politicians are the masters at having things both ways and Congress has many, quite deliberately created, mechanisms for enabling members to be on both sides of issues. I'm afraid I have yet to generate much optimism about the final product. I'd love to be wrong; we'll see.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Xantar
September 17, 2009 6:29 PM in reply to ThinkerT
True. That's also completely out of Nancy Pelosi's hands. She can only say what's going to happen in the House, not what's going to emerge from the conference committee. It's not as if she has any power to wrangle the Senate into including a public option in its own bill.
One step at a time. If she guarantees that the House bill contains a public option, she will have done her part. What more can you ask of her?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?