A new CNN poll has a curious result: President Obama now has a net disapproval among independents -- but his overall top-line approval is still in positive territory.
Obama's top-line approval is 53%, with 45% disapproval. Among independents, however, he's at 43%-53%. Nine out of ten Democrats approve of Obama, with the large amount of Dems keeping him up.
Obama also attracts a majority approval on foreign policy and terrorism, but majority disapproval on other key issues: Health care, taxes, the economy and the budget deficit.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

erichayes
September 1, 2009 5:14 PM
Let's see what happens when Dog Days are over and people, including congress, go back to work before we draw any conclusions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
September 1, 2009 5:35 PM
Oh polls! Pray for the day when there is news again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
arbalest
September 1, 2009 5:39 PM
Considering that "Independent" now includes: "conservative, but too embarrassed to actually call yourself Republican" these days...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AhTrini1
September 1, 2009 9:35 PM in reply to arbalest
Thank you; they are trying to hide, but we know just who they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
happycozy
September 1, 2009 10:53 PM in reply to arbalest
Independents have always tended to be conservatives who are pissed at Republicans for some reason, so it's no surprise Obama's numbers are low among them. If his numbers were high among independents, they'd be low among democrats. That's when I would start to worry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
arias
September 2, 2009 1:36 AM in reply to happycozy
Your claim makes no sense considering they WERE high amongst both independents and democrats after the first 100 days.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cy Guy
September 2, 2009 12:20 PM in reply to arbalest
- cosign -
Until, there are actually two functioning National Parties, polls that provide breakdown by party will provide uninformative results. Let us know what the Progressive/Moderate/Conservative breakdown is, or the Obama/McCain/Other-or-Non voters breakdown is instead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnmccsf
September 1, 2009 6:50 PM
It's going to get worse before it gets better
Ronald Reagan approval v. unemployment
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/Reagan%20Job%20Approval.jpg
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
prouddem
September 1, 2009 7:40 PM
I, for one, am sick and tired of the implied superiority of the "independent." Join a party! Stop floating on the air to see which way the breeze is blowing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
September 2, 2009 6:51 AM in reply to prouddem
Uh. There are some of us who feel the two main political parties are just a hair too deep in the pockets of the corporate overlords, you know? Maybe not all, or even a majority (since "independents" can be little Ronnie Reaganistas and others can be, well... Ralph Nader or Bernie Sanders; I won't count Lieberman, since he's living proof of being deep in the pocket of corporate overlords).
Sadly, Teddy Roosevelt — who felt the exact same thing about the Democratic and Republican parties 97 years ago, when he was proposing things like taxing the rich to keep their greed in check, paying a "living wage" [he invented that phrase] and universal health care — was never able to make his Bull Moose Party [less well known as the Progressive Party] become a viable thing. Maybe it was just the whole idea of being called the BM Party?
Ah, history.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
September 1, 2009 8:22 PM
Don't count my president out just yet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sunnysteve
September 1, 2009 8:39 PM
It's the hangover from the Bush debacle, plus Republican serial lying. It's OK. Economic indicators are trending up and fast.
Our main problem is a wimpy, bought and paid for, ADHD press. But people respond mostly to havin' a job and gettin' it on. It will be OK.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
September 2, 2009 7:21 AM in reply to sunnysteve
I am in near total agreement.
The only nit I pick is that I believe the "economic indicators" are deceiving, only because the underlying issues that caused the whole meltdown have not been touched. If anything, they have been reinforced through what I consider serious mis-steps by Obama. Foxes watching hen houses and all that, you know? (Geithner, Summers, and that whole pack.) Yes, reinforcing the Wall Street crooks has slowed the slide into oblivion, but they need to be put under some serious, serious controls (if not jail) which has not happened yet.
But that's off-topic from the main story. Yes, I agree that the Corporate Mass Media* still has a great deal of influence over mass opinion, and they are only emphasizing stories favorable to positions on the Right. One or... maybe 2 1/2... of their chatterboxes are doing actual reporting. I guess Rachel and Stewart and, occasionally, Maher and Olberman are their "tokens" maybe?
But, yes, yes, yes. I repeat myself from other comments on this thread — and apologize for that — but it's too important a point: Public opinion polls today are completely, 101% meaningless. August 2010 polls will be meaningful, but not today.
Those 08/2010 polls will be directly influenced by whether health care reform is put in place or not. And if jobs actually start to rebound, as opposed to their losses only slowing down. But maybe that last part is asking too much. I'll settle for health care reform right now; that other may follow as a result of the costs to our collective bosses falling as a result of that HC reform.
* Yes, I'm on a one person mission to quit giving the "MSM" so much credit. The are not "mainstream." They are corporate shills (with maybe the exception of 2 1/2 of their employees), all shaping reality to suit their employers' economic interests. They are Corporate Mass Media. Go ahead. Give it a try!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
September 2, 2009 12:00 PM in reply to TheRealFish
I like 'corporate media shills' but you are right RFish...anything but mainstream will fit!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trblmkr
September 1, 2009 10:03 PM
In-Depends-dense, as they call themselves are just waiting to see which way their buddy or boss goes.
I saw it at my workplace all the time. A new guy/gal would come in and 'feel out' the others, especially the boss, before piping up with their political opinions which would, magically, be in line with the crowd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
September 2, 2009 6:39 AM
Boy oh boy. If this were just August 2010, we'd have to be very worried, wouldn't we?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
September 2, 2009 6:41 AM in reply to TheRealFish
Duh. Okay, maybe a little in August 2010 — but I really meant August 2012. My snark gun got jammed!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CranialRectalLoopback
September 2, 2009 11:06 AM
When you court the Reich Wing-nuts you lose the intelligent independent.
Bipartisanship can also be between Democrats and Independents.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?