President Obama will clarify his health care reform principles before a joint session of Congress Wednesday, and a number of White House officials have come forward to suggest that the public option will not be among them. If that's the case, it will devastate the large segment of the reform community that regards the public option as one of the most crucial elements of legislation.
"The question is what's he gonna do in a week," says Richard Kirsch, campaign director for Health Care for America Now. "He's giving his address next Wednesday. We have to see what the President says."
HCAN is an umbrella group for dozens of influential liberal interest groups supporting reform.
"A lot of people will be disappointed if he doesn't continue to show his commitment [to the public option], but hopefully he will," Kirsch tells me.
His remarks indicate that if the President does not at least continue to articulate his personal preference for a public option, he'll be crossing a line.
"You win by rallying your supporters and convincing the middle," Kirsch says. "You don't win by disappointing your supporters and confusing the middle."
Amid today's controversy, Obama's political arm Organizing for America is continuing to push for a public option. So isn't the White House sending (at best) mixed messages about the public option?
"White Houses have a history of floating trial balloons," Kirsch adds. "What will really matter is what the president says Wednesday."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

rosebowl
September 2, 2009 5:57 PM
TPM is really becoming unreadable. Too much hyperventilating reporting from the writers.
"If that's the case, that will devastate the large segment of the reform community that regards the public option as one of the most crucial elements of legislation." So says Brian.
Why not wait till after the address on Wed to ascertain whether reformers will be "devastated"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The BBQ Chicken Madness
September 2, 2009 6:36 PM in reply to rosebowl
I notice, more often than not, when I read a story that gives me that reaction - it's Brian Beutler who's name is on it.
Not EVERY story, mind you, as others seem to be hopping the shark lately too. He's done some solid ones too. On a whole though, usually when I go "wow, seriously?", it's him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
September 3, 2009 9:26 AM in reply to rosebowl
We need strong support going to the whitehouse and Congress against the 'trigger'!
but we need to have sharp talking points---using the words that will get reactions--not lengthy explanations that cause people to turn off.
A trigger would give Insurances Cos FREE REIN FOR 3 YEARS!
A trigger would NOT CONTROL COSTS!
A trigger would NOT PROVIDE COMPETITION Till the Companies are proved to be abusive in court!
A trigger is a financial windfall to the Insurance Co's, Hmo's and Big Pharma! 46 million new custumors and NO negotiations on drugs!
A trigger is the republican DO NOTHING SOLUTION!
A trigger is a copout by Blue Dogs and repubs to their Corporate donors!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fkaZk0sm0
September 3, 2009 11:27 AM in reply to rosebowl
and when obama backs away from the public option it wil have been all tpm's fault, i'm sure.
and when health care reform ends up being a useless watered-down tangle of half-measures, you will be thrilled with obama's tenacity in the face of naysayers like tpm.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Philv
September 3, 2009 11:46 AM in reply to fkaZk0sm0
Unfortunately we have to live in the universe of what is possible, if I gave you two choices: no reform at all (no regulations for pre-existing conditions, no getting rid of lifetime limits, etc.) or a reform bill that did everything except create a robust public option, which would you choose? If you want to argue that they've blown the debate and it's their fault that people don't understand what the public option really is (maybe one more chance coming on Wednesday), then fine, I probably agree with you. But lighting ourselves on fire doesn't prove anything to anyone, it just leaves room for someone else to step in, maybe someone who would just as soon get rid of Medicare. We do the best we can and then live to fight another day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
September 2, 2009 6:02 PM
So he's giving a speech to a joint session to signal his capitulation? What's he going to do next, allow Texas to secede?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
September 2, 2009 6:20 PM in reply to bluebell
one can only hope...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sbv
September 2, 2009 6:22 PM in reply to bluebell
hey, let's hope so; what we save on social security and medicare to texans will pay for single payer, universal health care for the rest of us!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Wordie
September 2, 2009 7:16 PM in reply to bluebell
Good point, bluebell. Let's hope you're looking at it accurately. It would indeed be hard to imagine that he'd schedule a speech to a joint session of Congress just so he could publicly capitulate to the deranged wing of the GOP.
That said, I agree with the others on the seccession thing. What a load of problems that would solve! :D
And just a reminder: those who want the public option, make sure to attend MoveOn's Candlelight Vigils tonight. They're being held all around the country. More info here: http://pol.moveon.org/event/events/index.html?action_id=186
And there's the march on Washington, D.C. on September 13, too. We need HUGE turnout!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trblmkr
September 2, 2009 8:30 PM in reply to Wordie
Sh*t! I didn't know and would've gone. There's gonna be an Astroturf teabagger event near me on 9/12, I'll go to that and piss 'em off by talking cool, collected logic. They hate that...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sbv
September 2, 2009 6:28 PM
we need to step a minute, take a breath and think this through. regardless of what the crazies are yelling and the machiavellian gop is manipulating; we are the majority!
we need to let those like the two nelsons - ben and bill and mary landrieu and conrad know, vote for cloture then, if you feel you are truly representing the majority of your constituency, vote against health care reform with a strong public option.
however, those like the nelsons and landrieu and conrad need to stop listening to the choir and instead listen to the needs of the majority of your constituents.
the rest of us needs to stand up and speak out and let all know, we learned how to organize, canvas, talk to people, make telephone calls and donate; and we will do it again for anyone who obstructs president obama and his agenda he was voted into office with an overwhelming majority of american voters to enact!
no amount of yelling and screaming and campaign donations can overcome the will of a majority of voters!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist
September 2, 2009 8:30 PM in reply to sbv
"We need to step a minute, take a breath and think this through. regardless of what the crazies are yelling and the machiavellian gop is manipulating; we are the majority!" yes...you keep telling yourselves that if it makes you feel better.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HopefulPatriot
September 3, 2009 2:56 AM in reply to The Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist
Um, yeah...we actually are--by any and all counts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fkaZk0sm0
September 3, 2009 11:30 AM in reply to HopefulPatriot
and fat lot of good it's doing for you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wilson
September 2, 2009 6:59 PM
The public option was never an option. It was given away months ago when Obama first met with the insurance and drug companies. It was given away for the promise of not having them spend all their money attacking the health care reform.
Everything to date since then is just a roadshow. If there was even one small bit of a chance that public option was really on the table, the White House would be fighting for it tooth and nail.
You can easily tell how unenergetic Obama is when he talks about the public option. You can also tell how surprised they are that the left support this so much. They are really shocked at the support and anger. But they have no choice in this.
Every single one of his top advisors, Axelrod, Rham, Sebelius, and even Gibbs talk about the public option using words like, “something like the public option”. They never say, we want the public option.
We are being played, plain and simple.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
September 2, 2009 7:12 PM in reply to wilson
So he gave it away so they wouldn't attack healthcare reform and then they packed town meetings as United Healthcare did with their own employees? You have insurance pacs funding the thugs at the town meetings and that's what Obama got for caving on the public option? I hope he doesn't negotiate with Russia we'll be giving back Alaska too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wilson
September 2, 2009 7:32 PM in reply to bluebell
The thugs in the town halls are the extream ones that just want everything from Obama to fail. It's not the insurance companies.
Where are the million dollar commercials about how goverment helthcare is bad? What you really have is a bunch of small PACs getting money and putting up advertisements. The folks shipping in the nuts for the townhall are all being done by small groups.
If the insurance companies wanted to, there would be a all out billion dollar blitz right now. This is the closest they ever came to loosing money and we don't hear a peep from them.. why aren't they scared?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Wordie
September 2, 2009 8:07 PM in reply to bluebell
You're full of good ideas tonight, bluebell. :D
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
September 2, 2009 7:17 PM in reply to wilson
Bull. Obama has repeatedly said he wants competition and more than one insurance option in a region (can anyone say monopoly?). As McCaskill (who I suspect knows more about Obama's thought processes) said here in Missouri in the past few days, if there was competition, we'd be innundated with ads for various health insurance plans. Seen any of those lately?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wilson
September 2, 2009 7:28 PM in reply to cube3u
What does competition have to do with pushing public option?
You want competitaion? Put in the bill that every state must have a minimum of three insurance providers for the employees to choose from. If not then some co-op setup will provide the need.
Public option is D E A D. They will keep talking about it because they don't want a full blown revolt on the Dem side.
The only way it will ever get passed is if we force it down their throats and the chances of that are slim. Bring a couple of million supporters of the public option to Washington and we got a good start.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
September 2, 2009 9:55 PM in reply to wilson
The public option is being heavily pushed in order to introduce competition into the health insurance marketplace. Did you really not know? How convenient that you, an unknown blogger, have declared it "dead"....any reason we should be listening to you?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fkaZk0sm0
September 3, 2009 11:40 AM in reply to cube3u
"The public option is being heavily pushed "
by whom is it being 'heavily pushed'??
certainly not obama.
THAT is the point.
yes, the public option would be a better solution to introducing the competition, but 'competition' is what obama is pushing. he isn't sticking HIS neck out for the public option. he will be settling for less. and the WH has been telegraphing this for some time now. covering your eyes and ears doesn't change that fact.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
September 2, 2009 11:00 PM in reply to wilson
So how far are they planning ahead? They've been surprised about the support among Democrats for the public option so -- according to you -- they keep talking about it to avoid the anger. So what are they going to do for an encore -- just what do they will happen if something without a public option is passed? Does it occur to them that a significant amount of support from their base AKA the people who do the grass roots political work which redounds in excitement and support for a candidate -- will be D E A D?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Philv
September 3, 2009 11:48 AM in reply to wilson
You do know the difference between Pharma and the insurance companies right? Because the "deal" was with Pharma, and I keep seeing ads supporting reform from them and don't see Astroturfing activities being orchestrated by them. You may disagree with that tactic and not like the deal, but so far Pharma is holding to it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ru4862
September 2, 2009 7:44 PM
Reformers to Obama: You Don't Win By Disappointing Your Supporters
The headline speaks for its self.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wyt
September 2, 2009 8:17 PM
We don't want competing bad options. We want some good options in there. All existing insurance companies - even the few Blue Cross entities that haven't gone for-profit - have been playing the same dirty games so long that they're tainted. As a small businessperson with an non-profit Blue Cross policy, I've seen them play repeated tricks to try to drop my coverage - and they're far ahead in the premiums-to-payouts ratio on my policy. This just won't due. Americans largely hate our insurance companies, for substantial cause. Any "reform" that doesn't provide a clear alternative isn't worth doing. It's like living next to a closely-supervised serial rapist on probation. You'd really rather not, even if he's now promised to stop doing evil. The current insurance companies are, to the last one, beyond prospect of meaningful reform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trblmkr
September 2, 2009 8:38 PM in reply to wyt
I agree. At the end of the day, public option or whatever it's called, it has to be big enough and strong enough to spell the beginning og the end of for-profit healthcare insurance. If it's of insufficient critical mass (buying power) and doesn't have protections from opponents it will wither and die.
Adequate healthcare is either a birthright or a business, that's the crux.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
September 2, 2009 9:58 PM in reply to wyt
Have you missed the health insurance reforms that will apply to all of the players--things like not being allowed to deny you coverage, no limits on amounts, no pre-existing conditions? These are just the ones I know about off the top....but these will change the insurance market, even without the public option. And I am NOT saying there won't be a public option. But these reforms are extremely important ones and will eliminate the worst of the abuses....not all, but the worst.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bo
September 2, 2009 9:37 PM
Several years ago the smartest political analyst I know said "what evidence is there that the Democrats want to win"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
September 2, 2009 9:59 PM in reply to Bo
May I commend you for the least relevant statement so far....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
darter22
September 2, 2009 9:54 PM
Come on. If Obama can't come thru on every item on your agenda, are you really going to vote for Palin?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BaileyWu
September 2, 2009 10:02 PM
Some of us progressives don't want the public option -- we want a single payer plan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VivaAmerica!
September 2, 2009 10:44 PM
yadda, yadda, yadda.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?