In a timely profile this morning by Roll Call's Emily Pierce, Senate Majority Leader explains in his own words something I reported last night.
Reid said he is hopeful the Massachusetts Legislature will soon vote to allow the governor to appoint a replacement for Kennedy so he will again be able to call on 60 Senators, but he said that has not stopped Democrats from pursuing one of the few Republicans seen as open to bipartisan compromise -- Snowe."They're working on a Senator up in Massachusetts," Reid said. "There are different ways we can get to 60 votes. It's not just dependent totally on her. I hope we can [get Snowe's vote]. She's a good legislator."
But he said he is doing everything he can to avoid using reconciliation to pass health care reform.
"I would rather do a bill that we can get 60 votes on, either on a bipartisan basis or a partisan basis," he said.
If and when Democrats have a 60 vote majority, that changes the calculus somewhat. And though Snowe will continue to be a focal point of negotiations, the ultimate onus for the passage of health care reform will ultimately be on Democrats.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Walter Mitty
September 22, 2009 10:17 AM
Lieberman is to the right of Snowe on health care reform. I guess Reid and Durbin could threaten to strip Lieberman of his chairmanships, but I'm sure the Republicans would be waiting for him with open arms.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Redshift
September 22, 2009 12:34 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Lieberman can vote against the final bill if he wants, but no senator who joins a Republican filibuster against the top domestic priority the president campaigned on should be allowed to caucus with the Democrats. A vote you can only count on when it doesn't matter isn't a vote worth having, and certainly not worth trading a committee chair for.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Larry Geater
September 22, 2009 11:07 AM
Does it count as a bi-partisan bill if snow is for it and Lieberman is against it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jonathan Edelstein
September 22, 2009 11:44 AM in reply to Larry Geater
It ought to count as a bipartisan bill as long as Sanders is for it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Larry Geater
September 22, 2009 12:20 PM in reply to Jonathan Edelstein
You are so right! The Socialist and the Democrats!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LarsThorwald
September 22, 2009 11:48 AM
Am I correct that 60 votes on cloture gets us past filibuster, and then we can have peel-offs like Landrieu and Lieberman and Nelson and still get health care passed with 51 votes?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
September 22, 2009 12:15 PM in reply to LarsThorwald
That is my understanding. However Sen. Byrd is in bad health these days and I recall reading somewhere that he can't make the votes anymore. Maybe he could make the big ones.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Larry Geater
September 22, 2009 12:24 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
There is precident for rolling a Senator's hospital bed into the chambers for a vote. If he is conscious, he can vote.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
truthspeaker
September 22, 2009 1:00 PM
Like I've said again and again, just pass the bill and let the chips fallwhere they may. It is obvious that the republicans are bent on the destruction of your great country. I, living in Canada, cannot imagine how you guys manage with those high cost. Just imagine how much more money you would have in your household if you had a single payer system, and then to hear the lies these anti-people republicans tell about my country.
Perhaps, this contributes to a shorter life. JUST PASS THE BILL
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fpie
September 22, 2009 2:24 PM
So is Reid actually going to twist arms and kick butt? I'm really having a hard time envisoning that. Maybe he just hopes everybody will do the right thing.
Look, there goes a flying pig!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
September 23, 2009 2:06 AM
Hand-wringing about procedure and bi-partisanship is silly. If they passed a robust public option and it were good value, people would flock to it. They wouldn't much care how we'd gotten there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?