TPMDC

Report: GOP Leadership Worried About Damage To GOP's Reputation From Bachmann

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Politico reports that House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) are worried about the potential damage to the party's reputation from a certain back-bencher: Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN).

This paragraph is buried deep within their latest piece on Boehner's efforts to keep up with the GOP base:

Sources say they [Boehner and Cantor] have been especially wary of the possible damage inflicted on the party's reputation by bomb-throwing Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who last fall called for an investigation into whether members of Congress are "pro-America or anti-America."

They certainly are in a bind when it comes to Bachmann. On the one hand, the base loves her and she's frequently invited on television. On the other hand, she calls for revolution and warns against the government using Census data to round people up into internment camps. What's a body to do?

(Via Think Progress.)

Comments (53) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (8)

September 17, 2009 1:13 PM   

Oh yeah, she's the one hurting the GOP's reputation. If Bachmann were gone the GOP would be restored to glory because eveyone else in the parties leadership is so sane.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:28 PM    in reply to clandesdun

My thoughts exactly. Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones...

On the other hand, it's nice to see at least some semblance of push-back within the party. It always takes one before there are many.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:44 PM    in reply to clandesdun

No one has ever accused the Republicans of being self aware Boner probably believes something very close to what you've written.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:32 PM   

There is no doubt in my mind she is a gold mine for the Dems and it is actually in the Dems best interest NOT to pick up her seat. The more you can in the mind of the average voter make her the face of the GOP the better it is for the Dems.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:22 PM    in reply to Napoleon

i think it is in the country's best interest to have as few bachmanns in positions of power as possible.
multiple sane viable political parties would be much better than we have now. My count has the sum at less than 1 right now after giving generous partial credit to all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:32 PM   

And yet, not one of these 'leaders' seem to be able to grow a set and stand up to either her or the type of sick and wrong blather she spews ad nauseum.

Says all we or anyone needs to know about them and the Repub ideology. Ironically, she appears to have a bigger set than either one of them! Sadly, she is using hers for evil instead of good!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:46 PM    in reply to Aunt Sam

I was about to say exactly that... notice how the article refers to "sources say"... If they were really worried about Michelle Bachmann and actually jhad some cajones, they would tell her to close her cake-hole... but no, they can't do that... she appeals to the base... if someone's rhetoric is so inflammatory that you plant a story expressing your displeasure (y'know, without really expressing your displeasure) but she appeals to your base... what does that say about your base?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 3:04 PM    in reply to Aunt Sam

They are prisoners to the monsters they have created.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:35 PM   

They're kidding, right?

So, yelling out "You lie!" at the president on the House floor while he's speaking is all good. But, Bachmann's crossed the line?

Can somebody show me that line? I just can't figure out where the hell it is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:19 PM    in reply to chimpale

The location of the line changes on a daily basis for the GOP. You're not the only one that can't find it. They can't either.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 4:30 PM    in reply to ohyeathatsright

I know where that line is. First locate your nearest republican, then look behind them. It will be way behind them, at first you won't see it. Thats because you'll see the horizon first, its past that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 6:20 PM    in reply to OhSoBlue

"Follow the yellow rubber line . . . ." -- Firesign Theatre

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:43 PM   

The Republicans are the party of the 'stay at home moms' or Only Bad Girls Have Jobs. So they can take any amount of crazy, racist, delusional and certifiable behavior on the part of the men of the grand old party but if a woman gets nuts it's "jettison the crazy broad pronto." When you think of all the nutso paranoid stuff they have been yelling for years I think she fits right in. You'd think they'd let her in the big tent but then like I said she did abandon her kid to that socialist non profit so she must have been a bad mom.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:43 PM   

Lie down with dogs and get up with fleas.

Are Boehner and Cantor starting to itch?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:45 PM   

"On the one hand, the base loves her and she's frequently invited on television."
Does the base love, perhaps, because she's frequently on television?
Putting her wingnut plotics aside for sec, my additional concern is that 99% of the time her "claims" or "points" are FACTUALLY wrong. Nonetheless, she punches above her weight class in MSM appearances. This is even more dangerous than her views because she's being given credence.
The last thing we need is an increase in the misinformed populace!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:48 PM   

Maybe it's time for the GOP to get a new base?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:48 PM   

ROFLMAO! No stop! It hurts to laugh this hard!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:49 PM   

The real problem they have with Michele Bachmann is that she says overtly what they try to say using the dog whistle, and that just makes it harder to obscure just how crazy these ideas are.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 5:40 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

Yep. Because then the questions start being raised, and it's hard to deny, for instance, that one of your members wanted House members tested on whether they're sufficiently for the USA. . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:57 PM   

Like these guys have come out in public and made statenments to disavow her positions and raves! Come on; these turkeys are her lap dogs!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 1:58 PM   

The GOP leaders are either idiots or cowards or both for not having the intelligence or guts to stand up to the wacko fringe of their party. Obviously I think it's a bit of both but I'm especially sick of the GOP officials who really do know better but are too big of cowards to say anything.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:57 PM    in reply to JohnAH

If the Reeps were smart and had enough patience to take a longer view of the situation, they would indeed stand up to Rush Limbaugh and this crazy faction that has commandeered their party. Sure, they'd take some serious beatings for another election cycle or two, but they'd be able to reclaim a large number of independents over the long term, and - most importantly - it would be better for the country if one of the two parties in our two-party system weren't under threat of being controlled by insane depraved people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:09 PM    in reply to psyclone

Their problem is that they've pandered...no make that cultivated these nuts for so long that they've alienated just about everyone else. The crazies now comprise a majority of the party.

Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:06 PM   

I think the house minority should take up her suggestion of Fasting and Slitting wrists as a method to stop her

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:27 PM   

Hey...lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:42 PM   

Could it be something she's eating? As long as Obama is taking personal charge of everyone's diet, http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/4048/bachmann-on-both-worlds-worst-and-crazy-talk-on-the-same-day, he should start with her and detoxify her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:44 PM   

It's the difference between being craven and delusional--the two poles of the bipolar Republican party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:47 PM   

My concern is that they only consider Bachmann a worry. There are several of them they should be worried about

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 2:52 PM   

This is hilarious. Just NOW they're figuring this out?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:00 PM   

If they start trying to cull the crazies from their side of the aisle in Congress, they're really putting themselves on the proverbial slippery slope.

She's too crazy and/or inflammatory, but Joe Wilson, Paul Broun, Virginia Foxx, every Republican from the state of Oklahoma, Jim Inhofe, and Jim DeMint aren't? I mean, damn, the Republican Congressional Crazy Caucus is the largest subparty level caucus in Congress. Where do they stop?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:03 PM   

What to do? How about repudiate her, ignore the rabid lunatics that are part of your base, and attempt to build a majority party with people who are actually sane?

Radical, I know.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:15 PM    in reply to dougom

...build a majority party with people who are actually sane?"

I agree, they can build a party with sane people, but considering the character of the Republican Party that "elected" and enabled W, that "majority" part might be a bit harder to accomplish.

No offense intended (I'm a liar!) BUT THE MAJORITY OF THEM ARE NUTS, WITH AT LEAST ONE WING ATTACHED!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:11 PM   

Hey, is there a site for exposing Bachman like the one the Kansas Dems just put together for Lynn Jenkins?

http://www.jenkinsfail.com/

Well, yup, just did an easy google and here it is!

http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com/

Maybe all these foot-in-mouthers reality web sites should get together and make a linked navigation bar?

There could be a Republican men's bar and a Republican women's bar.

So, who else belongs on this list?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 3:50 PM   

Eric Cantor has an opinion about who he thinks is bad for the GOP? What a laugh. Whenever he does an interview he comes away looking RETARDED. He is a joke. Michelle is a total whack job but then look at all the other Republicans. Cripes what a sorry lot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 4:23 PM   

Palin-Bachmann 2012. With Steele as the Campaign Manager, Rush as the Communications Director, and Glenn Beck as the Head of Corporate Fundraising. Power to the (crazy) people!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 4:41 PM    in reply to ondioline

Don't forget Ensign as Personnel Manager, Vitter as Activities Director, and Sanford in charge of the Travel Office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 5:41 PM    in reply to sunnysteve

You left out Mark Foley, Director of Youth Outreach, and Newt Gingrich, Coordinator of the Family Values Initiative.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 5:59 PM    in reply to CT Voter

Duke Cunningham, Treasury Secretary?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 6:03 PM    in reply to Winston Smith

and Lou Dobbs, Director of Minority Outreach...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 4:01 PM    in reply to CT Voter

This is the most humerous thread I've ever read at TPM!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 5:50 PM   

"Assholes Worried that Dingleberries Hurting Reputation"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 17, 2009 6:01 PM   

The first Laugh Out Loud part of this story is the headline. Then, it's seeing the GOP "leaders" are. Boehner and Cantor are worried about someone else making Republicans look bad?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 2:02 PM   

I read this as wishful thinking on Politico's part. Is there one single shred of evidence that anyone can point to that substantiates this? If anything, this pair seems pretty on board with the direction of their party. Maybe they're just playing it safe, or Politico is giving them cover, so if it all implodes they can say, see, you should've listened to us, or to the rumors of what we might have been privately thinking.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 4:53 PM   

a wise party builds its house upon a rock.
the foolish party builds its house upon the shifting, fickle sands made of the shards of truth -

I read something about that somewhere - Oh, where could that have been?

no implication, mind you, that the dems are in anyway THE party built on a rock - BUT the Reps surely do seem to be the ones at this point who are finding it hard to get a firm footing on the sand they call a BASE.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 6:24 PM   

If Bachmann were to put on glasses, would she then be Sarah Palin?

Or is the fact that she apparently combs her hair before appearing in public expose her as being, well, Bachmann?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 7:29 PM   

For a party that "marches in union", with their "Yes Sir" reply to any orders that are given, it seems ironic that they can't control Bachmann.

What took Boehner and Cantor so long to "Become Concerned" about Bachmann?

She didn't just start acting in her whacky ways yesterday!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 8:03 PM   

What reputation?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 19, 2009 12:01 AM   

Find a crazy WOMAN, use her as much as you can and when things get out of control, blame everything on her - straight out of Rush Limbaugh's playbook. In the world of the far right, women are tools, nothing more.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 19, 2009 2:26 AM   

Let's not play along here, OK?

Cantor and Boehner obviously contacted Politico and gave them this story as part of their remake-the-Republican-Party-image-before-2010 campaign and Politico obliged them as expected. By the general election in 2010 the Republicans will be acting like they never heard of teabaggers/birthers/tenthers and will become indignant if you say they did.

Boehner and Cantor are more responsible for their party going off its rocker than Bachmann. They lead the party and haven't said diddly since they became leaders. They all quake before the altar of Rush and Beck.

Politico is simply helping them with the 2010 campaign, something that will be quite common in the months to come. Sadly, the MSM and even the left will help them play this game by getting all excited as they remake their image. Same group of radicals, they won't change just talk different as Luntz directs them. A new fake image and the public, after hearing it constantly, will fall for it.

The day, no, after Boehner and Cantor go on about 50 news shows and admit that they were wrong, call Bachmann is a freak, and admit they have personally led the nation astray with lies and misinformation, then I will just start to think they mean it.

This was the act of a couple conmen in cahoots with a propaganda outlet. Every time someone posts this kind of thing without context, they will be helping them by pushing the idea that there are "sane" Republicans who matter in their party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 19, 2009 11:13 AM   

You really shouldn't post pics of such a hideous beast right at the top of the page, I think you should have provided a link to it so visitors aren't forced to wretch in their own mouths as soon as the page loads.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 12:01 AM   

When is Boener going to reign in Boener? Not one of these so-called leaders takes credit for anything. Cantor is a mini-me to Boener, so you just get a scaled down version of Boeners uselessness. Bachmans' one of their value added candidates isn't she? The damage was done in the bush years, these holdouts are just the after effect, including Boeners weak minority position.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 11:39 AM   

Oh my. Boehner and Cantor have figured out that a big mouth can puke both ways. (Have these boys forgotten that they live in the same glass House as Bachmann? Mirror, mirror, on the wall... who's the most seditious of them all?)

Typical political misogynists... blame the woman.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 22, 2009 1:11 AM   

this idiot is just a example of what the republican party has become, the party of idiots, just say no, and party over country,, anyone that would vote for them or take them seriously has a mental problem,, boner himself needs to be replaced along with his ridiculous platform of ideas, my god where did these people come from and now we know how bushey was allowed to do all the criminal things him and cheney did,,,,the last 12 years of doing nothing but wrecking our country has taught them nothing but to stick their heads in the sand and let some crazies do as they wish,, would it be nice if all these politicians grew some balls and did what was right for the country instead of what was right for their bank books,, my god, whats wrong with passing a law that says no politician can take money from lobbyist,,,wouldnt that be a nice beginning,,,,,,, politicans should be limited to two terms, one in office and one in jail!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on