I noted this moment during the speech itself, but President Obama threw Republicans a pretty big bone tonight, by announcing he has greenlighted an initiative that will allow states to implement a range of medical malpractice reforms to see if they lower health care costs.
Republicans were pleased.
But, of course, the official GOP position on health care reform remains: "No!" In the official Republican response to the speech, Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA) said, "it's time to start over on a common-sense, bipartisan plan focused on lowering the cost of health care while improving quality."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

chimpale
September 9, 2009 11:14 PM
This was the one low point of the speech for me. Obama threw the thugs a bone. It's not the bone-throwing that bothers me but that he lent legitimacy to a thoroughly bogus claim.
The Republicans have been running with this bullshit argument that malpractice insurance premiums and/or payouts are what have been causing health care costs to rise. In fact, the combined cost of malpractice premiums and malpractice losses (verdicts, settlements, legal fees, etc.) represent less than 2% of the cost of health care in the U.S. And, malpractice premiums have dropped for the last two decades and have stayed below 1% of total health care costs the whole time.
The right thing to do is to tell the Republicans they're wrong, shove some cold hard facts in their faces, and promise them nothing. Playing along with these dimwits is, if nothing else, an unnecessary distraction. And, how will they ever learn anything if you let the dunces get away with this crap?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
heraldsquare
September 9, 2009 11:29 PM in reply to chimpale
and per the WSJ and a recent academic study, increases in rates are tied mostly to the insurance companies investing habits.
And the Republican doctor who responded had been sued for malpractice three times. Now, it's true anyone can sue anyone for anything, but I've been told by personal injury lawyers that medical malpractice suits are hard to win and they don't usually take them unless it's a slam-dunk..
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VivaAmerica!
September 10, 2009 12:12 AM in reply to chimpale
This is what the president thinks of tort reform:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/21/2205
I don't think his opinion has changed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
storm
September 10, 2009 12:33 AM in reply to chimpale
i don't recall him talking much about malpractice. he mentioned defensive medical practices adding to cost, which from my limited experience seems to have some truth to it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
September 10, 2009 10:51 AM in reply to storm
The Republicans weren't cheering wildly at the idea of ending defensive medicine. It was at the mere suggestion of tort reform. They're not worried about what the doctors are paying. They're worried about trail lawyers being employed and earning money.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rhallnj
September 10, 2009 7:06 AM
Since the final bill will undoubtedly contain some Republican ideas, I would like Obama to announce that is sufficiently bipartisan by definition already, and make no further efforts to court actual Republican votes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Unnamed Former Party Official
September 10, 2009 9:14 AM
Obama is following a bi-partisan approach, focusing on the two major mainstream parties: the blue dogs and the progressives. I don't think he needs to have the extremists at the table.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
afisher
September 10, 2009 10:41 AM
The call by the GOP: to start over is totally bogus and they know it. They try and make it sound like they were absent during all the committee debates, which is a lie. Their call to start over is their only hope, but it is a delay tactic and dead on arrival.
As Senator McCaskill (MO)pointed out during August, her state implemented tort reform on malpractice...no reduction in insurance premiums and the most recent statistics I could find are that the spending in Medicare has not decline as a result of this tort reform.
We all see BIG Headlines when a medical malpractice case is resolved at trial, but there is no apparent data to support the idea of tort reform would doing anything but decrease physician costs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?