TPMDC

Snowe Wants Key Health Care Measure Strengthened Before She Supports Baucus Bill


Sen. Olympia J. Snowe (R-ME)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's long been known (reported at TPMDC and elsewhere) that, among the now defunct Gang of Six, two senators were advocates for giving poor and middle class taxpayers greater government assistance to buy health insurance: Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) and, unexpectedly Olympia Snowe (R-ME).

But now Snowe says that, if she's to support the final package out of the finance committee, the subsidies in the bill will have to be strengthened. "[T]here would have to be more subsidies," she told the New York Times.

That's something liberals support to, though it would require more revenue, which likely means new taxes. And Snowe's been less forthcoming about how to pay for the subsidies than about her general support for them.

Still, reformers on the left probably won't be too excited by this. Despite advocating for greater government assistance, Snowe also opposes a public option unless it's affixed to a trigger mechanism, and supports the "free-rider" provision, which would make it profitable for employers to discriminate against poor people.

Join the Conversation!

8 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

September 18, 2009 2:04 PM   

But now Snowe says that, if she's to support the final package out of the finance committee, the subsidies in the bill will have to be strengthened. "[T]here would have to be more subsidies," she told the New York Times.

So, how would that (increased subsidies) lower health care costs? If the Fed is going to pony up for those who can't afford insurance, what's the incentive for insurance companies to lower premiums and deductibles?

Speaking of cost: do anyproposed bills actually lower health care costs? Is that even an objective?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 2:31 PM    in reply to Schmed

Only the public option. That is its purpose.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 2:53 PM    in reply to wbgonne

And that's the one that most docs want. Go figure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 4:37 PM    in reply to Schmed

I believe that is what the MedPac/IMAC groups are supposed to do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 6:36 PM    in reply to Schmed

The subsidies aren't about lowering costs they are about AFFORDABLE HC. If I have a family of four and I am making over 66k I won't get ANY Gov subsidies so I will end up paying almost 13% on HC JUST ON PREMIUMS. That is not acceptable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 8:02 PM    in reply to theone718

If you don't ultimately lower costs, affordability is a pipe dream.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 18, 2009 6:34 PM   

It's an absolute fact this bill WILL MOVE TO THE LEFT. Without Enzi and Grassely Baucus now has to get consensus from EVERY Dem in his committee. If he loses two he cannot pass a bill. I think we are in pretty good shape to get an alright bill passed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 19, 2009 10:59 PM   

an alright bill

I don't see how you get there with the 850 bill ceiling, the most expesive way of going at this (mandate + subsidies--it's Medicare D and the subsidized private medicare funded hmo's redux). and the lack of any kind of true non-profit.

Fuck it. Let's junk the whole thing, and open up the VA to membership via premium.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on