
As I laid out moments after the proposed amendments to the Baucus bill were announced, the public option will have its day on the Senate Finance Committee.
That day is today. The 23-member panel will consider amendments sponsored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that, if adopted, would add a public option into the panel's health care reform bill.
Two things to keep in mind if you're watching the hearing or reading news accounts about the developments: the two proposals are very different, and neither is expected to pass. The Rockefeller amendment is a version of what we've come to know as the "robust" public option. It would, for a time, be tied to Medicare, and, thereafter, be able to use the government's considerable leverage to bargain down payment rates with providers.
The Schumer proposal, by contrast, is what we've come to know as the "level playing field" public option: much like the public option provided for in the Senate HELP Committee's proposal, its rates would be negotiated by the government with providers, just as private health insurance companies are forced to do.
Though most reformers by and large would prefer a Rockefeller-style public option, for political purposes, the one to pay close attention to today is Schumer's. It's the "compromise" public option, that can't really be honestly construed as a massive government intrusion into the insurance market. Its impact would be relatively minimal, and though it, too, is not expected to pass, we'll get to see, for the first time, a number of key senators--Baucus, Conrad, Lincoln--dispense with all the vague public statements and go on the record.
It will also provide reformers a sense of how much support there is within the greater Senate (particularly among Senate Democrats) for a public option--which could still be added at a number of key legislative moments down the line.
As the headline indicates, a big day (though not the last day) for the public option.
neesy08
September 29, 2009 9:47 AM
What do you mean these ammendments are not expected to pass? What's the point, then?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Doc Magnus
September 29, 2009 10:25 AM in reply to neesy08
Cover. It's like the one blank round loaded into one random rifle in the firing squad, so every man who pulls the trigger can imagine he didn't commit the execution. Baucaus et al. can vote "NO" then claim down the road that they had no choice but to accept a public option after conference with the House to get any reform at all.
It's all political theatre.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
September 29, 2009 10:52 AM in reply to Doc Magnus
Call them NOW --tell them what you need...1.800.828.0498 or 1.866.220.0044
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
September 29, 2009 10:54 AM in reply to Doc Magnus
Call them NOW --tell them what you need...1.800.828.0498 or 1.866.220.0044
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AdAbsurdum
September 29, 2009 10:56 AM in reply to Doc Magnus
Elegantly put.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ru4862
September 29, 2009 9:55 AM
Today is 'do or die' for the politicians who call themselves democrats. Are they going to be on the side the poor and working class or the corporate slugs?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
September 29, 2009 10:43 AM in reply to ru4862
Right! And again, if congressional Dems pass a good health care bill with a public option, they are the ones who will benefit politically. It cannot be emphasized enough that whoever gives the American public better-and more affordable-health care WILL reap political benefits! Why do you think the R's oppose giving democrats anything on this issue?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
September 29, 2009 9:55 AM
One other thing to keep in mind is that a vote against both of these amendments by one of the barelydems here could be a way to generate cover for a cloture vote followed by a vote against the bill.
As long as a public option gets in there somehow--whether when the HELP and Finance bills are blended or through a floor amendment or in conference, ultimately, the cloture votes are the only ones that count. (I'm assuming thre will be at least 50 votes for a bill with a public option, though the last count I saw of public commitments was a few heads short of that mark, but I just don't think Schumer and Rockefeller would be even trying if they didn't think they had at least 50 votes in their pockets).
I'm not saying there won't be a time for life-shortening fits of rage. I'm just saying you'll do yourself a favor by remaining hopeful there's a bigger picture and postpone the dangerous blood pressure spikes and hormonal surges for as long as possible.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fsudirectory
September 29, 2009 10:05 AM
Apparently Judd Gregg was on CNBC yesterday and in a beat down manner suggested that a Public Option would not be included within the SFC Bill, however would make its way into the final bill that comes out of committee btwn the House and Senate.
So I wouldnt put too much weight on today's vote, and im shocked that Judd Gregg Didnt get much play with his comments.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
September 29, 2009 10:17 AM
Actually today's vote will be a preview of how Obama will advance or lose his agenda for his reforms. Consumer Protection, financial regs, Energy and Employee Free Choice are the next battles and if the dems fold and run on health care, who the hell can expect the rest to pass...Howard Dean said it best...if the dems don't use the majority they have, they will lose it!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Doc Magnus
September 29, 2009 10:28 AM in reply to Progressive Party
See my comment about "cover" -- I think it's a lot of gamesmanship, and I don't think the right can mobilize masses on "bloodless" issues like financial regulations they way they did on something visceral like the so-called attempt to socialize medicine. The coming battles you describe will pit average Democratic voters against corporate interests. Hard to say who's going to win, but today's committee vote is not a predictor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
September 29, 2009 10:32 AM in reply to Doc Magnus
Well..your points are of important but you should be realizes how deep wall street is in the Senate's pockets and if the dems can not push thru meaningful health care reform when 65% of the public wants a public option, then it's all down hill from here. It's been a year since the crash and where is the financial and wall street reform?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Doc Magnus
September 29, 2009 11:09 AM in reply to Progressive Party
I can't disagree but that doesn't mean I'm giving up or giving in.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?