Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) is turning up the heat on the White House, saying the fate of health care reform is in President Obama's hands. But he's also leaving open the possibility that Obama could disappoint his supporters and not endorse a public option in his big health care speech Wednesday.
"If he stands up Wednesday and says, 'To the country and to my colleagues in Congress, we are going to have a public option in this plan because we need and here`s why,' it`s going to get done," Weiner said. "If he doesn`t, we`re going to have to settle for less and that will be a tragedy."
Yesterday, Weiner said it's possible that a "triggered" public option could pass in Congress. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi insisted that a health care bill without a "strong public option" (which typically implies no trigger mechanism) can not pass the House.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Steve LaBonne
September 4, 2009 11:08 AM
Sigh. No, Congressman, you don't HAVE to settle for less (and quite possibly, for worse than useless). And in any case you should NEVER pre-emptively compromise with yourself in public. I sure hope there are enough backbones in the Progressive caucus that are firmer than Weiner's.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VivaAmerica!
September 4, 2009 11:19 AM
This is ridiculous. Weiner, if you want a PO, DELIVER it to the President by getting the votes in the senate. Is the WH the only one that can influence the Senate? I'm sick and tired of all this talking.
Has anyone of these Dems in Congress who are on tv all the time challenging Obama, ever publicly challenged specific members of their party who are holding out on the PO? honestly I don't know if they have or haven't. Does anyone know?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
September 4, 2009 12:05 PM in reply to VivaAmerica!
Not that I've ever noticed.
That wouldn't be civil, would it?
No. Rather then ruffle feathers, they prefer to criticize the president publicly, further eroding whatever unity existed in the party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
El Puerco
September 4, 2009 2:45 PM in reply to CT Voter
Well, I think the President should be expected to have more influence over Senators than would a mere House representative.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris
September 4, 2009 11:27 AM
I think that is about a true of a comment from a Member of Congress as you will ever get.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mardam
September 4, 2009 11:39 AM
Give him nothing if he insists on no PO. It's a trump card and it seems to be a good one.
If Obama will "do whatever it takes" to get a bill, remember what he said.
Make him do it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
September 4, 2009 11:50 AM in reply to mardam
If there are votes for a PO, why not give him a PO instead?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
September 4, 2009 11:44 AM
Come on Anthony, don't be a Weiner!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
September 4, 2009 12:44 PM in reply to GTFOOH
wiener?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
September 4, 2009 12:58 PM in reply to Schmed
New York accent...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AudioGuy
September 4, 2009 11:55 AM
I am really disappointed that the President is willing to stare down progressives who worked for him rather than stare down ignorant Republicans and turncoat Democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
myshadow
September 4, 2009 12:04 PM
The political strategy that is being employed is a bit dissonent. I have been biding my reaction thinking that the President is playing 3D Chess. The month of August was one big rope a dope. With Kennedy's illness/death a lot of energy was dissapated from the health insurance reform movement. If, it is true we are now being slowly informed there is a different kind of compromise. It seems 'we' are being played against the right. The more liberal wing of the body politic would hardly want to align ourselves with the defeat of a program that would embarrass and weaken the President.
Roger Simon from politico was on hardball yesterday he took a question from tweety about 'the left' scuttling the President's proposal. Simon wouldn't take the bait and said it isn't 'the left' it was the People Obama promised during the campaign. The public option was ONLY thing that would/could keep the insurance companies 'honest', such as it is.
I don't think the calculus of fear and racism that is cynically being successfully being manipulated by the corporate swill has been well factored by the administration. I have cut them a lot of slack since the disseminators of ANY information are owned by the republicans. I will wait for 'the speech'.
I will gladly be a roped dope if the President smacks down these jackals. If not the words of Frank Rich a couple of weeks ago that we were 'punked'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
September 4, 2009 12:14 PM in reply to myshadow
I don't think the calculus of fear and racism that is cynically being successfully being manipulated by the corporate swill has been well factored by the administration.
Nor did they evidently factor in the willingness of Democrats in the Senate (Max Baucus) to derail reform. Maybe he's playing 3 dimensional chess, and the genius of it will be revealed in the coming weeks. Right now, to me? It looks like the White House has handled this disastrously.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
September 4, 2009 12:05 PM
Here's a point to ponder. Yesterday, I stumbled on a piece in the Wall Street Journal; in less than nine months, "the Fed has bought roughly $740 billion in mortgage-backed securities and the debt of government backed mortgage agencies". The entirety of health care reform would cost $1,00 billion a year. So, Bernake, Obama & Guitner, the Dems and the Repubs have taken the health care reform money and spent it instead to cover the financial institutions' miscarriage of public responsibility. The 'fiscally responsible' Repubs & Blue Dogs went merrily along with the bailout, little if any blow back, peddled it as 'an emergency'.
Now, in the next couple of weeks, the bonuses for the CEOs and higher-ups in the financial industry - bonuses for getting money from the government to cover their misdeeds, not bonuses for adding to the wealth and well-being of the nation - will be announced by Obama's 'pay czar', and Obama will take the heat from Repubs, Blue Dogs and the public. The Dems will do nothing. And things will continue. Including no meaningful health care reform.
The $740 billion to bailout Wall Street is only a drop in the bucket , a small part of the debt Obama, the Dems, the Repubs and the Blue Dogs have presided over (mostly in silence and without the radio raves calling out the ignorant to 'protest').
Now, they're happily sacrificing health care reform in the name of 'budgetary constraint' and 'simply not doable'.
Bottomline, with the government we have today (Democratic or Republican), there are no decisions made with the best interest of the people in mind. Health care reform will simply be another give away, this time to the private health insurance industry. The 'details' to be determined in close door meetings with the industry lobby.
Next week, the government gives away health care reform. What we could have had health care for - $ 1,000 billion per year - we gave away to the financial industry in bailouts - $ 3,000 billion in a single year; the soon to be announced 'bonuses' for the financial industry - while a pittance - will simply rub salt in the wounds. (And speaking of wounds, the billions squandered to 'win' against 'stateless terrorists in Afghanistan can be added to the many insults to the American people's intelligence. Oh, yes, another Wall Street Journal piece noted that the administration's lauded 'mortgage relief program' just cant seem to get off the ground - having helped only a small fraction of the people it was intended to help. Adding to the difficulties, people cannot refinance because they're losing their jobs - guess they werent bailed out.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JadeZ
September 4, 2009 12:11 PM in reply to bill
and now everyone is realizing exactley what you write.
the results?
look at the polls.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
drwu
September 4, 2009 12:31 PM
Dems once stab themselves in the back--now they have the backbone of a chocolate éclair.
The ruling paradigm (greed,fraud,war,empire) is killing us!
Our only hope: Wall Street collapses from its inability to keep its penis in its pants; the Pentagon dies from imperial overreach and a bad case of full-spectrum dominance blues, and the vampiric Health Care industry chokes on the blood from its last few living subscribers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
September 4, 2009 12:49 PM in reply to drwu
That's "our only hope"?! You may as well throw in the "magic ponies for Christmas!" item onto that wish list.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
leftcoastindie
September 4, 2009 12:48 PM
There seems to be something going on here that doesn't make sense... or maybe it does. Just last week Weiner was adamant about the public option. Now all of a sudden his knees go wobbly.
In and of itself the public option is no big deal. It's only purpose is to help keep costs under control. It does not provide any other benefits - it doesn't have anything to do with preconditions; it doesn't have anything to do with rescission etc.. As far as health care goes it will not improve the delivery or quality of care. It will affect only a small minority of individuals (~ 10 million or so). However, it will control costs to some extent. And short of a single payer system it is the only thing that can control costs to any relevant degree. So what gives? Why is the message so garbled over one single "sliver" of the health care legislation?
Money is the only thing I can think of. What else can make rational people act in the way we are seeing them act.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
September 4, 2009 2:01 PM
No Congressman if Obama doesnt support the plan KILL THE FUCKING BILL
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
September 4, 2009 2:31 PM in reply to 3star2nr
The House Progressives are perfectly capable of blocking a bill by themselves. If the bill passes without a public option, and TPM bloggers want to blame Obama for this? Hey, that's fair. But if the bill passes without a live public option then Anthony Weiner will have no one to blame but himself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
El Puerco
September 4, 2009 2:51 PM in reply to 3star2nr
And then what? 1994 all over again. The Democratic base is discouraged, the independents think the DEmocrats cannot do anything, the Republicans retake the House, and NOTHING even mildly progressive gets done. I want a public option and have been pushing my representative (Carney) and Senators (Specter and Casey) on it, but if it cannot pass the Senate, and the House is faced with a bill without a public option, then I want the House to pass it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cindy Lugo
September 4, 2009 3:30 PM
Single-payer should have been used as a bargaining chip. To compromise both is to trade our health, financial stability and our nation's solvency in exchange for votes.
The fact that Nancy-Ann DeParle and United Health Group are involved in “negotiating” reform is appalling. She made a living in the “for-profit” insurance industry as an adviser to investors. Sits on boards of for-profit firms that make billions from Medicare and Medicaid. United Health Group is the most egregious, corrupt and disgusting Insurance Company in the entire industry. This is a direct affront, and duplicitous act, against the very people who put him in office and gave him a majority to work with in Congress
United Health Group and Nancy-Ann DeParle will not recommend anything viable. Their "Asymmetric Analysis" is ludicrous and misleading at best. The Insurance Industry will protect its profit margin at all costs. They stand to make outrageous profits and by no means will they help lower the cost curve.
United Health Group and others will run successful non-profits, writing off billions in advertising, exorbitant salaries and lobbyists. We will be forced to subsidize the massive increase in their profits without "triggering" a government run public option for years, if ever. This will increase in % of GDP spent on health care, heavily subsidize the Insurance Industry; destroy our citizens’ financial stability and our nation’s solvency.
These Members of Congress, both Republicans and Blue Dogs, are more concerned about elections/re-election than our health and well being. They are complicit in lies and dis/misinformation in order to deceive the public for political gain that will compromise our health, financial stability, and our nation's solvency.
The fact that 45-53% believe all these lies is their responsibility and it is unconscionable. Members of Congress who lie, or constituents who believe and propagate those lies, must never be allowed to dominate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marquis de SeaToShiningSea
September 4, 2009 3:33 PM
Weenie Whiner has got to go.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?