Changing tunes? Just a couple weeks ago, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) said health care reform legislation would not be viable in the House without a strong public option. Now he says it might squeeze by even if it guarantees no public option at all.
"I think anything like a trigger would be a retreat from the idea of getting cost savings in this bill. We might be able to pass it. It might be able to get through Congress. But it won't accomplish what the President and the American people say they need, which is cost reductions, immediately.
At one point, over 60 House progressives said they'd balk at such an idea--enough to doom the overall bill. Is that number going down?

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

admiralmpj
September 3, 2009 6:31 PM
Boy, I can't wait to hear the comments on this one...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
September 3, 2009 7:33 PM in reply to admiralmpj
Yeah, Weiner didn't possibly say he was open to Olympia Snowe's offer on the trigger, let alone Rahm Emanuel's: he's one of the "good" ones, right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
StevenD56
September 3, 2009 7:02 PM
Doesn't sound like a retreat to me. He was saying that a public option was still necessary. The "might be able to get through congress" line was in response to a hypothetical, and he was not at all enthusiastic about it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Philv
September 3, 2009 7:09 PM
Brian, you're just going to have to accept that right now, you can't tell us what is going to happen next. I know it sucks and it's your job to scoop everyone else, but there's just too much tea-leaf reading going on right now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
September 3, 2009 7:31 PM
I'd like to bring everyone back to something Brian wrote in one of the early stories today, in which we were informed that the White House had poisoned, stabbed, shot, drowned and dragged to death any hope of a public option: everything is very fluid.
In other words we are guaranteed to know for certain about a thousand different statuses of the public option and health care reform in general between now and Wednesday. Fun bloggy times, I guess.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marquis de SeaToShiningSea
September 3, 2009 8:56 PM
Weeny Whiner blows it again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
xargaw
September 4, 2009 12:51 AM
NO TRIGGER. It's now or no bill.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
September 4, 2009 7:32 AM
Well, I have defended this writer against charges that he hyperventilates and interprets every statement in an histrionically negative manner. But I saw the Weiner interview and Mr. Beutler is indeed sensationalizing the Congressman's comments. If anything has changed in the past couple of days, it is that progressive members of Congress are stepping up and trying to take charge of the debate. They have already succeeded in that the debate have shifted from "the public option is dead and not worth discussing" to "why is the public option so important." That is vital because, on the merits, the public option wins hands-down. Just listen to any of the opponents when forced to discuss HCR rationally; they flail. Which is precisely why we've been subjected to Tea Parties, Town Hall Thugs, and now Obama the Socialist Indoctrinator of Children. The opponents of HCR cannot win on the merits, so they must turn the "debate" into a World Wide Wrestling Match, replete with gouged eyes (and non-surgically removed pinkies), people tossed out of the ring, chairs smashed on heads, and a wild crowd screaming and frothing at the mouth (that, of course, would be the American people and the MSM).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?